Venue: Beaumanor Hall, Beaumanor Drive, Woodhouse, Leicestershire
Contact: Karen Brown / Bryn Emerson (Tel. 0116 305 6432) Email: karen.m.brown@leics.gov.uk / Email: bryn.emerson@leics.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
Apologies for absence/Substitutions. Minutes: Apologies for
absence were received from Richard Spurr, Jo Blackburn, Mark Mitchley, Kath Kelly, Michael Wilson, Alison Deacon and
Tony Gelsthorpe. |
|
Minutes of the Meeting held on 22 February 2016 (previously circulated) Minutes: Minutes and Matters Arising The minutes of the
meeting held on Monday 22 February 2016 were agreed. Matters Arising The representation
of Secondary Academy Headteachers was raised and it
was agreed this would be discussed separately. Steve McDonald made
a comment specifically relating to the perceived use of LA basic need capital
funding in supporting age range change across the county in 2015/16, in
particular how much had been allocated, to whom and for what purpose. Jenny Lawrence referred Steve McDonald to the
information provided to Cabinet which sets out the capital programme and that
£1.5m had been spent on year 6 retention in primary schools.
LH confirmed that
capital had only been used to enable removal of the 10+ system i.e. retention
of Y6 in primary schools in areas where secondary age range was progressing for
example in Wigston. Callum Orr queried
the LA policy and vision and statements regarding reorganising secondary
schools. David Atterbury confirmed that
the strategy for the planning of school places does not identify the
development of all through schools as a priority but states that the LA will
seek to support this where there is evidence of basic need growth in the
particular area. |
|
2015/16 Schools Budget Outturn Minutes: 2015/16 Schools Budget Outturn Jenny Lawrence
introduced her report to the meeting which sets out the outturn position and
confirms the Dedicated Schools Grant (DSG) Reserve and its intended use. Jenny said that
overall the schools budget was overspent and referred to paragraph 6 which sets
out the significant variances. Jenny
highlighted the high needs block variance which included SEN and the changes in
terms of the grant settlement which were the significant areas. The balances for maintained schools were
unavailable as the local authority was currently in the progress of collecting
financial information. However, initial
data suggests the balances may have increased. Paragraph 9 sets
out the updated position on the DSG reserve which was presented to Schools’
Forum on 22 February 2016. This has
slightly increased in order to meet the deficit for maintained schools becoming
academies. Fossebrook
Primary School opens in September which is an expected new school growth. Jenny referred to
the proposed allocation of the reserve set out in paragraph 10 but added with
the impact of the Government policy for 2017/18 there is a range of areas that
will have an effect over the next few years.
These are outlined in paragraph 12. Jenny said that
2015/16 was the first year that the DSG has overspent since its introduction in
2006. The DSG reserve will continue to
be monitored and the local authority’s position is that there are no additional
resources with which to provide financial support. A Forum member
commented that paragraph 11 is a crucial paragraph and asked if it was a policy
decision from the County Council. Jenny
said that it was the local authority. Mr
Ould commented that it is the policy as part of the MTFS. Prior to DSG the County Council topped up the
government grant but when DSG came in that additional funding was absorbed into
the grant. Sonia Singleton
asked if that was discussed annually at Cabinet. Mr Ould said it was included in the MTFS
process and that the local authority was required to find £20M savings before
2020. Schools’ Forum
noted that the table in paragraph 10 regarding new school growth should read
“No provision ……….school funding reform it is expected that local authorities
……”. Schools’ Forum noted the financial outturn
for the 2015/16 Schools Budget (paragraphs 5-6). Schools’ Forum noted the level of DSG
reserve and its deployment (paragraphs 9.10). |
|
School Funding Issues Minutes: School Funding Issues Jenny Lawrence
introduced her report to the meeting which aims to clarify for schools and
Schools’ Forum the process behind three aspects of schools funding which are
the subject of much debate but often based on partial or incorrect information
namely;
Jenny reported that
this paper contains no new information to reports presented at different times
to Schools’ Forum where it had been discussed widely. Jenny stated that
firstly the local authority must treat all schools equally; there is no
differential between academies and maintained schools. The local authority may treat primary and
secondary schools differently usually within the funding rates. Current decisions on schools funding affect
maintained schools, academies and the two studio schools but not special
schools. It was also worth noting that
School Funding Formula is the basis for allocating a fixed pot of funding and
that governing bodies determine how the funding is spent. Allocation of
Additional £20.5M in 2015/16 Jenny stated that
paragraph 11 states how the allocation methodology was determined. Paragraph 12 sets out how the recommendations
were made which schools were widely consulted on. The working group representation was 56%
secondary and 36% primary. Paragraph 13
sets out how it was delivered and paragraph 14 sets out the consultation on the
proposals. Nick Gorforth asked why the 2.75% AWPU increase was
rejected. Jenny commented it was not
supported by Schools’ Forum following a very vigorous discussion. Funding age
range changes Jenny referred to
paragraph 16 which confirms that that the local authority has consistently
stated that it has no revenue or capital for age range changes. The first group of academies undertaking age
range changes did so with the knowledge of the 1 year lag in funding which then
resulted in the EFA requiring local authorities to fund such changes by pupil
number variations or face the EFA removing the money they thought necessary to
fund age range changes from DSG. The
local authority worked with schools and the EFA to establish a system whereby
expanding schools being funded for estimated September pupils and protection of
80% for falls in pupil numbers in the first year of change, funded from
headroom in the overall DSG settlement.
Jenny emphasised that no school has ever been or ever will be funded for
100% of its number on roll and this was still the position. Steve McDonald
asked what the method of calculation was for age range changes and when was it
shared with secondary schools. Jenny
said that it was agreed by Cabinet and the method of calculation was the
October 2013 scheme formulated with schools.
Steve McDonald commented that there was no indication of the method when
the first schools went through age range changes. Jenny reinforced that the local authority did
not provide this scheme for the first year of age range change but had to
respond to changes in the operation guidance issued by the EFA in year two of
change. The scheme was discussed many times and whilst the local authority had
a responsibility to inform schools then those schools also had a responsibility
to clarify the financial position prior to submitting business cases. Karen Allen stated
that the age range change was discussed at the September 2015 Schools’
Forum. If a school was making a change
they should be expected to find the information on how this would affect school
change. The funding formula does exist
and was part of the process. Sonia Singleton commented that not all schools ... view the full minutes text for item 4. |
|
School Funding Update Additional documents: Minutes: School Funding Update Jenny Lawrence
introduced the report which sets out the outcome of the financial survey
undertaken with primary schools and academies, sets out the current situation
for funding age range changes and provides an update on 2017/18 school funding. Jenny commented
that the survey was summarised in paragraphs 12-16 which has been discussed
many times. The survey was slightly out
of line with school balances and Jenny said that work was being carried out on
this. The local authority
met with a group of secondary schools.
There was a consistent view that the current scheme should not be
changed but that the term estimate should be redefined and pupil growth removed
from the adjustment. Jenny commented
that a concern has been raised with the EFA on the impact of school funding
reform and retaining the funding in the formula used for protection for schools
with falling rolls as a result of age range changes, as a local authority we do
not get additional funding and therefore might lose £2.5M. Sonia Singleton
asked if the Schools’ Forum could make the EFA aware of their concerns
regarding the announcement of the national funding formula. Jenny agreed to assist Sonia with some words
to send to the EFA. Schools’ Forum noted the contents of the
report. Schools’ Forum noted and voted to agree with
the local authority’s preferred option for the 2017/18 school funding formula
(paragraph 8) subject to the expected phase 2 consultation on school funding
2017/18. |
|
Charging for VI and HI Services Additional documents:
Minutes: Charging for VI and HI Services Chris Connearn
introduced the report which sets out the implementation of charging for hearing
and vision support services to schools. Schools’ Forum
referred to paragraph 12 and asked if British Sign Language would be included
in the ‘core offer’. Chris confirmed
that it would. Sonia asked if a
hearing impaired unit would be additionally charged from the hearing support
service. Chris confirmed they would not
because they have children on roll at the school. Schools’ Forum noted the intention to charge
schools for some hearing and vision support services from September 2016. |
|
Change of Date for September meeting Minutes: Change of Date for September meeting The Schools’ Forum
noted and agreed the change of the next meeting date to Monday 19 September
2016, 2.00 pm at Beaumanor Hall. |
|
Any other business. Minutes: Any Other Business Support to Schools Steve McDonald asked about support to schools who receive
financial notice to improve their financial management. Jenny said that the local authority had no
statutory role in that process. The
local authority has facilitated a meeting between the Regional Schools
Commissioner and the EFA where the financial position of secondary schools was
discussed. Callum Orr asked
about support for academies as maintained schools would receive support. Jenny said that deficit recovery was not
funded from the DSG as it was set against school surpluses. Conversations had taken place with the EFA
that academies should have that same option.
As a maintained school the local authority would see you through a
phased plan. Jenny said that these
issues are constantly being raised with the EFA. David Hedley
commented that the answer is given to form a MAT but that was not a solution. |
|
Date of next meetings Monday 19 September 2016 Monday 5 December 2016 Thursday 9 February 2017 Monday 12 June 2017 All the above from 2.00 – 4.00 pm at Beaumanor Hall. Minutes: Date of Next Meeting Monday 19
September, 2.00 – 4.00 pm at Beaumanor Hall. Future dates: Monday 5 December 2016 All dates from 2.00 – 4.00 pm at Beaumanor Hall. |