Venue: Sparkenhoe Committee Room, County Hall, Glenfield
Contact: Sam Weston (Tel: 0116 305 6226) Email: sam.weston@leics.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
Webcast. A webcast of the meeting can be viewed at http://council.webcast.vualto.com/leicestershire-county-council/home?EventId=14156. |
|
Chairman's Announcement. Minutes: The Chairman drew members’ attention to the fact that today’s meeting
would be the last attended by Sir Clive Loader as the election for the new PCC
would be held on 5 May and the Panel’s next meeting would not be held until 30
June. Accordingly, the Chairman read out the following statement: “As members will be
aware this will be the final meeting of the Police and Crime Panel attended by
Sir Clive and I would wish to put on record our thanks to you Commissioner and all
of your staff for your help and involvement with the Panel over the last four
years. In particular, we as
members of the Panel have greatly valued your integrity and high work ethic. It
goes without saying that it takes someone of strong character and ability to
set up an office from scratch, as you did back in 2012, and your efforts in
maintaining a lean office should be applauded. Whilst we have
provided support and challenge to you through our Panel meetings, we hope you
will recognise that we have also provided support to your work through our
challenge and scrutiny. I’d like to take this
opportunity ahead of our business today to wish you all the best for the future
in whatever you decide to do with your newly found spare time. A photo has been
arranged to be taken at the end of today’s meeting with the PCC, his staff and
members of the PCP to mark the end of the Commissioners’ term of office with
the Panel.” |
|
Minutes: The minutes of the meeting held on 20 February 2016 were taken as read, confirmed and signed. |
|
Public Question Time. Minutes: No questions had been received. |
|
Urgent Items. Minutes: There were no urgent items for consideration. |
|
Declarations of Interest. Minutes: The Chairman invited members who wished to do so to declare any interest in respect of items on the agenda for the meeting. Cllr.
M. Sood declared a personal interest in respect of all substantive items
as a member of the Police’s Independent Advisory Panel, as the Chairman of the
Leicester Council of Faiths, as a member of the Bishop’s Faith Forum and as a
member of the Gold Community. |
|
Leicestershire Youth Commission. PDF 335 KB Minutes: The Panel considered a report of the Police and Crime Commissioner concerning an update on the Leicestershire Youth Commission (LYC). A copy of the report, marked “Agenda Item 5”, is filed with these minutes. In introducing the report, the Commissioner made reference to a session held at South Leicestershire College he had attended as a PCC candidate at which he and other candidates were questioned about policing matters. When elected, he had attended a follow up session there at which it had become clear that there was a lack of warmth between the youngsters (16-17 years old) and the Police. Following this session the Commissioner had suggested that he would do all possible to ensure the voice of the youngsters was heard. The establishment of the LYC was seen as a step towards this goal. Leicestershire was one of the first areas in the country to establish a Youth Commission. Arising from a discussion, the following points were noted: ·
200 youngsters had attended the Youth Commission
Conference. The membership of the LYC was fluid with some having moved on to
the Police Cadets and one now operating as a Special Constable. The PCC did not
view the LYC as a recruitment tool however. The PCC was happy with the
socio-geographic spread of the LYC membership and he offered to report back to
the Panel with more specific data in regard to those on the LYC who had
learning difficulties; ·
The LYC had been one route through which the
Police hoped to gain a greater understanding of issues such as online grooming.
Representatives on the LYC each brought their own level of understanding, some
with personal experience, which enabled the Force to gain greater intelligence
on the methods through which this form of crime had been known to have grown.
An opportunity existed for the LYC to work more closely with “Warning Zone” on
issues such as online grooming; · Members of the LYC were offered training in areas such as presentation and facilitation skills and media training. RESOLVED: (a) That the report be noted. (b) That the Panel would welcome an end of year progress report on the LYC at its meeting on 5 December. |
|
Quarter 3 Performance Report. PDF 287 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The Panel considered a report of the Police and Crime Commissioner concerning an update on performance for Quarter 3. A copy of the report, marked “Agenda Item 6”, is filed with these minutes. Arising from a discussion, the following points were noted: ·
Decreasing satisfaction levels for the way in
which the Force had dealt with hate crime was cause for concern. There was also
concern around possible under reporting of this type of crime. The Deputy Chief
Constable felt that the embedding of neighbourhood policing to build up local
expertise in this area was key to tackling it effectively. Additional surveying
of victims of hate crime would hopefully enable the collection of more detailed
data around why satisfaction levels were falling; ·
Many preventative measures were being taken to
arrest the rise in vehicle crime, though it was acknowledged that most thefts
were as a result of people leaving their vehicles unlocked, or even with the
keys in the ignition. Other schemes aimed at halting the rise in moped thefts,
such as the PCC’s offer of funding to establish a regulated moped riding event,
were being investigated; ·
The County Council’s reduction in preventative
measures such as tackling substance abuse and alcohol misuse was expected to
impact the Police. It was felt that “system thinking” to tackle funding gaps
such as these on a partnership basis would be critical to staying on top of
crime; ·
Anti-social behaviour incidents were known to be
under reported. Though satisfaction levels amongst victims of this type of
crime had fallen, they still remained high when compared nationally; ·
The intelligence recording system, NICHE, was
now being used by all forces in the East Midlands and enabled a more joined-up
approach to tacking crime. The system experienced some teething problems, but
was thought to now be working well; · The recent publication of a report on Leicester Prison which stated that legal highs were easily obtained by inmates was concerning. A law change on the use of legal highs had been anticipated in April but had not emerged. RESOLVED: That the report be noted. |
|
Victim First - Update. PDF 228 KB Minutes: The Panel considered a report of the Police and Crime Commissioner concerning an update on the first five months in operation of “Victim First”, a new service for victims and witnesses. A copy of the report, marked “agenda Item 7”, is filed with these minutes. Arising from a discussion, the following points were noted: ·
The service appeared to be performing well but
there was a lack of understanding in communities for what the service offered; · The service had offered support to 3,712 victims and witnesses, however only 247 had received a service. It was suspected that this was as a result of most not requiring or wishing to receive the service, however a more detailed performance framework aimed to establish some target outcomes for the service. This was likely to be available in a report to the Panel in December. RESOLVED: (a) That the report be noted. (b) That a further report on the progress made by the Service be received at the Panel’s meeting on 5 December. |
|
Date of next meeting. The
next meeting of the Panel is scheduled to take place on Thursday 30 June at
1.00pm. Minutes: It was NOTED that the next meeting of the Panel would be held on 30 June at 1.00pm. |