Venue: Sparkenhoe Committee Room, County Hall, Glenfield. View directions
Contact: Damien Buckley (Tel: 0116 3050183) Email: damien.buckley@leics.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
Webcast. |
|
Minutes of the meeting held on 2 November 2021 PDF 154 KB Minutes: The minutes of the meeting held on 2 November 2021 were taken as read, confirmed and signed. |
|
Question Time. Minutes: The Chief Executive reported that no questions had been received under Standing Order 35. |
|
Questions asked by members under Standing Order 7(3) and 7(5). Minutes: The Chief Executive reported that no questions had been received under Standing Order 7(3) and 7(5). |
|
To advise of any other items which the Chairman has decided to take as urgent elsewhere on the agenda. Minutes: There were no urgent items for consideration. |
|
Declarations of interest in respect of items on the agenda. Minutes: The Chairman invited members who wished to do so to declare any interest in respect of items on the agenda for the meeting. No declarations were made. |
|
Declarations of the Party Whip in accordance with Overview and Scrutiny Procedure Rule 16. Minutes: There were no declarations of the party whip. |
|
Presentation of Petitions under Standing Order 36. Minutes: The Chief Executive reported that no petitions had been received under Standing Order 36. |
|
Medium Term Financial Strategy 2022/23-2025/26. PDF 727 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: The
Committee considered a joint report of the Director of Children and Family Services
and the Director of Corporate Resources which provided information on the
proposed 2022/23 to 2025/26 Medium Term Financial Strategy (MTFS) as it related
to the Children and Family Services department.
A copy of the report marked ‘Agenda Item 8’ is filed with these minutes. The
Chairman welcomed Mrs. D. Taylor CC, Lead Member for Children and Family
Services, to the meeting for this item. Arising
from the discussion, the following points were raised: Service
Transformation i)
Demand
for children and family services continued to increase with growth of £25m
projected. In response to the pressures,
the department had embarked on four main programmes of work – the High Needs
Development Programme, Defining Children and Family Services for the Future
(DCFSF), the Children’s Innovation Partnership and departmental
efficiencies. It was acknowledged that
further work was still required, but the department now had new ways of working
to respond to the ongoing pressures and to continue to create a more efficient
service. Proposed
Revenue Budget ii)
The
total gross proposed budget for 2022/23 was £703.1m, which included £482m
Dedicated Schools Grant budget. The
proposed net budget for 2022/23 totalled £90.5m. The largest cost to the budget was children
in care and it was queried whether a breakdown could be given of how this was
spent. The Director of Children and
Family Services confirmed that the majority related to placement costs with a
proportion also relating to staffing. A
breakdown was available of how many children were in different placements and
the associated costs; the number of children in care, the total costs and the
average unit costs were tracked and this would be
circulated to members of the Committee. iii)
A
member raised the point that growth over the next four years was not just about
demand but also related to meeting the complexity of needs. It was queried whether the demand could be
met due to the current high level of strain on services. In response, the Director stated that the
department had a number of statutory requirements that
needed to be met. The growth projections
incorporated the increase in demand for services, particularly relating to
children in care. The department was
also considering other areas where demand could be reduced. iv)
It
was raised that an increase in demand for services could lead to an increase in
the demand for social workers. A
question was raised around the impact that this would have on the County
Council in recruiting appropriate staff.
The Director responded that there had been a projection for the need for
more social workers. Recruitment and
retention of social workers was a national issue and the County Council had
undertaken lots of work to consider how it might attract staff and ensure that
they remained with Leicestershire. The
department’s Recruitment and Retention Strategy set out plans to address this. Growth v)
Growth
over the next four years totalled £25.1m.
The majority of the growth requirement related
to continued increases in demand and the complexity of needs for children’s
social care services which culminated in increased placement costs and the need
for more social workers. vi) It was noted that G1 – Social Care Placements – should read £2.265m in 2022/23 rising to £19.25m by 2025/26. The budgeted growth over four years assumed a 5% increase due to the significant work undertaken within the department with the DCFSF programme. These had been projected based on the number of children expected to be in care and the type of placements. Average unit prices for placements ... view the full minutes text for item 50. |
|
Development of Family Hubs in Leicestershire. PDF 67 KB A PowerPoint presentation will be delivered at the meeting. Minutes: The Committee received a presentation of the Director of
Children and Family Services on the Development of Family Hubs. A copy of the
presentation marked ‘Agenda Item 9’ is filed with these minutes. Arising from the discussion, the following points were made: i)
In response to a query around the
difference between Family Hubs and existing Wellbeing Centres, it was noted
that Family Hubs would offer universal access to services for all families
across Leicestershire who had children aged between 0-19 (or 25 where the child
had SEND ) through single point of access. The service would be delivered
through a mixture of physical and virtual spaces to support and signpost families,
some of whom might have mental or physical health needs, towards the
appropriate service. Existing Wellbeing Centres offered services to targeted
families where a child with vulnerability had been identified. ii)
Data sharing and cross working between
services and agencies would be vital in delivering the best possible services
to families and to support early identification of vulnerability, targeting of
resources, and more seamless support for families. iii) Initial and continuous engagement with
families and communities would be central in the development and delivery of
the service. Resource had been made available from the Build Back Better Fund
to begin the engagement work during the early stages of developing the Family
Hubs. The Lead Member for Children and
Families agreed that the Family Hubs would be important in helping all families
and preventing them from requiring statutory services. A report was due to be
presented to the Cabinet on 11 February 2022 seeking approval to develop a Family
Hubs model in Leicestershire and to undertake engagement with communities and
families on the proposed model. RESOLVED: That the presentation be noted. |
|
Inclusion in Leicestershire Schools. PDF 341 KB Minutes: The Committee considered a report of the Director of
Children and Family Services which provided an overview of the functions of the
Inclusion Service and of the new strategic duty to promote the education of all
children known to a social worker. A copy of the report marked ‘Agenda Item 10’
is filed with these minutes. Arising from the discussion, the following points were made: i.
The Inclusion Service would discuss with
families, at the earliest opportunity, any decision to electively home educate
to ensure that the best decision was being made for the child, and that clear
messaging had taken place in terms of roles and responsibilities for the
child’s education. Once the decision had been taken, the duties of the service
would be limited. However, checks would be conducted to ensure the correct
processes were in place. Any safeguarding concerns or other issues raised by
other agencies or within the community would be investigated by the service. It
was noted that there was increased evidence that home education could be the
last resort where relations had broken down with schools; this could include
issues around unmet SEND needs. ii.
The Inclusion Service would support children
either outside of, or alongside, an Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP) and
work would be undertaken to ensure that children’s needs with SEND were met at
the best possible level. iii.
In response to a query around the number of
children on roll in Leicestershire Schools who did not attend their catchment
school, it was stated that the authority would try to ensure that children of
primary age could access their closest school or would be supported to access
the next closest school. However, it was
not uncommon for children to attend a school out of their catchment area due to
parental choice. iv.
In response to a query around the impact of
COVID-19, it was noted that the pandemic had had a direct impact on the
delivery of SEND provision as well as on children’s wellbeing and their ability
to engage with schools. The available
data was currently somewhat anecdotal as the pandemic was still ongoing and it
was agreed that it would be useful to receive a further report in a year to
provide an update on the number of children who were being electively home
educated and the impact of Covid-19. v.
The Lead Member for Children and Families
reiterated that hidden children were the main concern for the department, and
there was a reliance on partners and communities to report any children where
it was felt they might be missing education. A campaign around this issue would
be undertaken again. RESOLVED: a)
That the report be noted; b)
That a report to update on progress would be
provided to a future committee. |
|
Unaccompanied Asylum Seeking Children. PDF 238 KB Minutes: The Committee considered a report of the Director of
Children and Family Services which provided an overview of Leicestershire
County Council’s duties and responsibilities to Unaccompanied Asylum Seeking
Children (UASC) and the context in which the County Council delivered services
to these children and young people. A copy of the report marked ‘Agenda Item
11’ is filed with these minutes. In response to a query around the data in paragraph 29 of
the report, it was noted that the 5.29 children which Leicestershire could
expect to accommodate on average per year was made up of spontaneous arrivals,
arrivals through the National Transfer Scheme and via dispersal hotels. These
were used by the Home Office to place UASC who it was felt were over the age of
18, but upon further checking it became apparent that they were under 18. RESOLVED: That the report be noted. |
|
Date of next meeting. The next meeting is scheduled to take place on 8 March 2022. Minutes: RESOLVED: It was noted that the next meeting of the Commission would be held on 8 March 2022 at 2.00pm. |