Venue: Sparkenhoe Committee Room, County Hall, Glenfield. View directions
Contact: Damien Buckley (Tel: 0116 3050183) Email: damien.buckley@leics.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
Minutes of the meeting held on 6 September 2022. PDF 240 KB Minutes: The minutes of the meeting held on 6 September 2022 were taken as read, confirmed and signed. |
|
Additional documents: Minutes: The following
questions, received under Standing Order 35, were put to the Chairman of the
Children and Families Overview and Scrutiny Committee: a)
Question
asked by Sue Whiting “Could the Chair please state how much training members of the Inclusion
Team have in SEND, particularly in the Specific Learning
Difficulties/difference/disability, as these are the children who can often be
very anxious because of unmet provision for their needs?” Response by the Chairman All members of the Inclusion Team who carry out direct work with
children and young people are expected to undertake training relevant to the
young people that they are working with. The training undertaken includes Autism
Awareness training levels 1&2 with some staff completing level 3 where this
supports the direct work that they have completed with a child or young person.
The whole service has completed training on Adverse Childhood Experiences
(ACES) and Trauma Informed Responses. Members of the service have taken part in
Thrive training and we have a licensed Thrive practitioner. Staff have also
undertaken training in Emotional Literacy Support, Dyslexia and Neurodiversity,
Emotion Coaching, Dyslexia Awareness, Building Emotional Resilience, Mental
Health First Aid, Words and Pictures and Hearing awareness. Supplementary question asked by Sue Whiting “Thank you for this comprehensive list of training. I am very familiar
with most of the training listed but would value an explanation of the
components of Thrive training and which particular role the licenced Thrive
practitioner plays”? Response by the Chairman At the invitation of the Chairman, the Director of Children and Family
Services responded that Thrive Practitioners were education officers for
children with medical needs who worked with children, parents, schools and any other involved agencies to plan a child or
young person’s education, whether that be requesting face-to-face or online
tuition, in planning for a return to school, or engaging some other support
around that child. The Thrive training had been an approach used by a number of schools in Leicestershire to support mental
health needs of children and young people through training for staff in early
years and school settings. The overall aim would be to boost the resilience of
children by fostering an exclusive culture which would enable children to
thrive. The Director advised that more information could be found at https://www.thriveapproach.com/about-thrive/about-us.
b) Question
asked by Jane Williams “Panels
make decisions on the lives of disabled children and can be the difference
between getting the provision they need or not. Because these panels are so
important to disabled children, can you confirm or deny if minutes are taken at
all panel meetings and what the minimum required SEND law training for someone
to be part of a panel?” Response
by the Chairman The Local Authority are required to make a number of
decisions relating to the SEND. In making these decisions, the Council is
required to follow the relevant legislation and the related guidance set out in
the SEND
Code of Practice (2015). There is no requirement for the Council to establish any Panel mechanism
to make the above decisions. However, in common with most other local
authorities, Leicestershire County Council have established a
number of Panels to make these decisions. All decisions made by the
Panel are recorded, communicated to parents/carers and
added to the child’s case file. There is no minimum training requirement for Panel members, but each
person will be professionally qualified in their own field. Supplementary question asked by Jane Williams “I know you said that you document decisions, but do you take minutes of how you came to that decision and how that decision complied ... view the full minutes text for item 27. |
|
Questions asked by members under Standing Order 7(3) and 7(5). PDF 182 KB Minutes: The following question was received under Standing Order 7(3) and 7(5) and was put to the Chairman of the Children and Families Overview and Scrutiny Committee: Question asked by Mr Max Hunt CC “Could I have the number
of Independent SEND Settings used by the Local Authority in the last two years,
so far as it is possible, together with the pro rata cost to the authority?” The Local Authority
has commissioned places for children with special educational needs and
disabilities from 64 providers over the last two years. The total spend on Independent Provision in 2020/2021 was £20,915383
and in 2021/22 it was £22,016,004. Mr Hunt thanked the Chairman and officers for an informative response to his questions. |
|
To advise of any other items which the Chairman has decided to take as urgent elsewhere on the agenda. Minutes: There were no urgent items for consideration. |
|
Declarations of interest in respect of items on the agenda. Minutes: The Chairman invited members who wished to do so to declare any interest in respect of items on the agenda for the meeting. No declarations were made. |
|
Declarations of the Party Whip in accordance with Overview and Scrutiny Procedure Rule 16. Minutes: There were no declarations of the party whip. |
|
Presentation of Petitions under Standing Order 36. Minutes: The Chief Executive reported that no petitions had been
received under Standing Order 36. |
|
Leicestershire School Admissions. PDF 257 KB Minutes: The
Committee considered a report of the Director of Children and Family Services
which provided an overview of the
Leicestershire School Admissions responsibilities and how the department
delivers these responsibilities. A copy of the report marked ‘Agenda
Item 8’ is filed with these minutes. Arising from the discussion, the following points were made: i.
In response to concerns that some children had not
been allocated a school place for the academic year 2022/23, the Director
explained that there would usually be a number of
children awaiting a school place at any given time. Members noted that some of
these cases would have been where parents or carers had missed the deadline for
applying, applications for a mid-term transfer, which would include those
children that had moved into the area, children that had not received an offer
at their preferred school after statutory transfer rounds. The Department aimed
to allocate children with a school place as quickly as possible and work with
parents to make the best possible choice for the child. However, where school
places in preferred schools were not available, this led to appeal to the
tribunal. ii.
In response to question regarding whether it
would be possible to amend the application form to ensure that parents state
three preferred schools, and that this include the catchment school, the
Director explained that the School Admissions Code states that this cannot be
mandated. However, the Department had
improved messaging during the application process to recommend and encourage
parents to state three preferences and to make them aware of the consequences
where only one is stated. Despite this a number of parents
had only stated one preferred school thereby limiting the chance of the child
receiving a school place close to them in the event of not being successful in
receiving a place at their preferred school. Members noted that the
Department had communicated with schools regarding the importance of
advertising catchment areas on their website and had signposted parents to
check this before applying. iii.
Members noted that when offering places, many
schools placed priority on children who are subject to an EHCP, looked after
children and those known to social workers. The Director explained that sibling
groups and the distance from the school would also be important to many schools
when offering places, but that schools, in particular academies, could chose to
operate their own admissions policies. The Department would guarantee to commit
to offering a school place to asylum seeking children and the children of those
in armed forces. iv.
In response to concerns over the number of
parents who had not applied for a secondary school place for their children in
the academic year 2022/23, the Director explained that the Department had
experienced 200 fewer applications than expected, although some of these would
be expected to make last minute applications. Some of these children would be attending independent schools and some
may have been moving away from Leicestershire. Members noted that there
would be no automatic entry to schools where parents had not made an
application. The Department followed up with families who had not applied and
would continue to issue reminders, through primary schools, for parents and
carers to apply for a secondary school place. v. In response to a question regarding the success rate of parents appealing an admissions decision, the Director explained that the first stage of an appeal would look at whether the Admissions Code had been correctly applied, and the second stage would consider the impact on a school if it were overfilled. Some parents had appealed an admissions decision on ... view the full minutes text for item 33. |
|
Leicestershire's Response to Tackling Child Criminal Exploitation. PDF 280 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The
Committee considered a report of the Director of Children and Family Services
which provided an overview of the work
and progress of the Child Criminal Exploitation, Missing and Modern Slavery
Hub. A copy of the report marked ‘Agenda Item 9’ is filed with these
minutes. In introducing the report, the Director congratulated Ayshea Dalby Team Manager within the Vulnerability
Hub at Wigston Police Station who had received a silver award for Team Leader
of the Year at a Children’s Services awards evening alongside partner
organisations. The Chair offered her congratulations and all members of the
Committee to Ayshea and the whole service. Arising from discussion, the following points were made: i.
In response to a question regarding the
Department’s strategy for tackling the challenge of an increasing number of
children under the age of 11 who had been involved in county lines activity,
the Director explained that the department worked closely with head teachers
and regional partners to reach children of all ages. Members also noted that theatre
productions and training materials on trusted relationships and online danger,
which had been used for secondary aged children, were being tailored so that
they would be appropriate for primary aged children. The Director explained
that the Child Criminal Exploitation (CCE) Team and the Child Sexual
Exploitation (CSE) team worked together to
deal with the separate aspects in such cases and that this approach had
been commended by Bedfordshire University. ii. Members noted the Department worked closely with the Police and had two response teams based at Wigston police station to respond to Child Exploitation and Domestic Abuse. The Partnership approach provided a network opportunity and joint risk taking. The Director explained that daily meetings would assess the previous 24 hour period and if a case of child exploitation or a missing child had been reported, a formal meeting would be held to grade the child. If the child had been found to be at high risk, the child would be allocated a police detective, a social worker, and possibly a youth worker, who would deliver support services to the child from initial disclosure to any judicial process and then in recovery. iii.
In response to concern regarding the high number
of CSE referrals which had been received in quarter 1, the Director explained
that many of these children would have been known as a result of early
intervention work carried out to identify children at risk of becoming involved
in exploitation such as those facing exclusion from school, a child at risk of
going into care, vulnerable 16–17-year-olds facing homelessness and first time
entrants to having contact with the police. Members noted that the service had
reported positive outcomes through delivering this piece of work and would
continue to be focussed on inclusion rather than exclusion. iv.
Regarding the low number of CSE referrals of
children from black and minority ethnic (BME) backgrounds, the Director
reported that there had been underreporting from BME communities. The
Department had received support from the Police and Crime Commissioner in
commissioning work with BME champions to deliver support to communities. v. In response to concern that a significant percentage of CSE referrals were children with some form of disability, or children with an Education Health and Care Plan (EHCP), the Director explained that in the majority of cases, a perpetrator had targeted a vulnerable child and made an online connection with the intent on exploitation. The Department focussed on early intervention and on providing early support to children at risk of being exploited and would continue to offer support to children and families in ... view the full minutes text for item 34. |
|
Q2 2022-23 Performance Report. PDF 148 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee considered a joint report of
the Chief Executive and Director of Children and Family Services which
presented an update on the Children and Family Services Department’s
performance for the period to September 2022 (Quarter 2). A copy of the report
marked ‘Agenda Item 10’ is filed with these minutes. Arising from discussion, the following
points were made:
i.
In
response to concerns regarding a decrease in single assessments completed
within 45 days the Director explained that the Department had experienced increased
demand as well as challenges with staff sickness and availability of agency to
cover these areas but assured members that all children had received an
assessment, although some had taken longer than expected to complete.
ii.
Members
noted that the decrease in the number of children and families ‘worked with’
had been due to a large number of children and
families ‘worked with’ in the previous quarter. The Director explained that the
number of referrals received varied at different points in the year and assured
members that robust processes were in place to ensure that children and
families would be supported. The Director agreed to review how comparative data
was present to allow for a more accurate reflection of performance. RESOLVED: That the update on the Children and Family
Services Department’s performance for the period to September 2022 (quarter 2)
be noted. |
|
Leicestershire Fostering Agency Statutory Report. PDF 224 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee considered a report of the Director
of Children and Family Services which presented an overview of the activity of
the Leicestershire Fostering Agency between March 2021 and March 2022. A copy
of the report marked ‘Agenda Item 11’ is filed with these minutes. The Director thanked staff within the
service for their work throughout Covid-19 and beyond in supporting carers and
children, as well as their work in identifying foster carers and supporting
children within foster placements. The Chairman asked that any comments from Members on the
report be submitted to the Director of Children and Family Services. RESOLVED: a)
That the overview of the activity of the
Leicestershire Fostering Agency between March 2021 and March 2022 be noted. b)
That members of the Children and Families
Overview and Scrutiny Committee be requested to submit their comments on the
report to the Director of Children and Family Services. |
|
Leicestershire Adoption Agency Statutory Report. PDF 170 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee considered a report of the
Director of Children and Family Services which provided members with an
overview of the activity of the Adoption Agency during 2021-22. A copy of the
report marked ‘Agenda Item 12’ is filed with these minutes. Arising from discussions, the following
points were made:
i.
Members
noted that a decrease in the Adoption Support Fund (ASF) claimed in 2020-21
when compared with 2021-22 had been due to extra funds having been available
during Covid-19 to provide extra support to families with children not being in
school as well as other additional support.
ii.
In
response to concerns regarding difficulties which had been faced by adopters in
accessing the Adoption Support Fund, the Director explained that difficulties
had been faced when applying for funds due to criteria methods and that the
Department would often have to work on a claim a number of
times before it being approved by ASF. Members noted that here had also been an
increase in waiting times for ASF to be processed through the system which had
led to delays in making payments to adopters. The Department had introduced a
dedicated contact form for adopters to approach the service at any time.
Members noted that there had been a shortage of staff during the spring and
summer which had resulted in a short waiting list to access the service but
were assured that all cases had been allocated.
iii.
The
Director thanked staff within the service for their continued focus on
supporting children and adopters and for their initiative work in identifying
permanent, safe homes for children.
iv.
The Chairman asked that any further comments
from Members on the report be submitted to the Director of Children and Family
Services. RESOLVED: a)
That the overview of the activity of the Leicestershire
Fostering Agency between March 2021 and March 2022 be noted. b)
That members of the Children and Families
Overview and Scrutiny Committee be requested to submit their comments on the
report to the Director of Children and Family Services. |
|
Annual Report of the Independent Reviewing Officer. PDF 261 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: The Committee considered a report of the
Director of Children and Family Services which presented the Annual Report of
the Independent Reviewing Officer with regard to
children in care and evaluated the extent to which Leicestershire County
Council had fulfilled its responsibilities to children for the period 1 April
2021 – 31 March 2022, including its corporate parenting function. A copy of the
report marked ‘Agenda Item 13’ is filed with these minutes. The Chairman asked that any comments from Members on the
report be submitted to the Director of Children and Family Services. RESOLVED: a)
That the extent to which the Council has
fulfilled its responsibilities to children for the period 1 April 2021 – 31
March 2022, including its corporate parenting function be acknowledged. b)
That members of the Children and Families
Overview and Scrutiny Committee be requested to submit their comments on the
report to the Director of Children and Family Services. |
|
Date of future meetings. The next meeting of the Children and Families Overview and
Scrutiny Committee is scheduled to be held on 24 January 2023 at 2.00pm. Future meetings of the Committee will be held at 2.00pm on the
following dates: 7 March 2023 6 June 2023 5 September 2023 7 November 2023 Minutes: RESOLVED: It was noted that the next meeting of the Children and Families Overview and Scrutiny Committee would be held on 24 January 2023 at 2.00pm, and that future meetings had been scheduled to take place at 2.00pm on the following dates: 7 March 2023 6 June 2023 5 September 2023 7 November 2023 |