Venue: Sparkenhoe Committee Room, County Hall, Glenfield
Contact: Damien Buckley (Tel: 0116 305 0183) Email: damien.buckley@leics.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
In Attendance. Minutes: Stephen Knight and Ashley Page, Newton Europe representatives (Minute 58
refers). |
|
Minutes: The minutes of the meeting held on 24 January 2023 were taken as read, confirmed and signed. |
|
Question Time. Minutes: The Chief Executive reported that no questions had been received under Standing Order 35. |
|
Questions asked by members under Standing Order 7(3) and 7(5). Minutes: The Chief Executive reported that no questions had been received under Standing Order 7(3) and 7(5). |
|
Urgent Items. Minutes: There were no urgent items for consideration. |
|
Declarations of interest. Minutes: The Chairman invited members who wished to do so to declare any
interest in respect of items on the agenda for the meeting. Mr.
R. Martin declared a registerable interest, in respect of agenda item 8, as the
Chair of the Leicestershire Parent Carer Forum and involved in the work with
Newton Europe. He undertook to leave the room during discussion of that item. |
|
Declarations of the Party Whip in accordance with Overview and Scrutiny Procedure Rule 16. Minutes: There were no declarations of the party whip. |
|
Presentation of Petitions under Standing Order 36. Minutes: The Chief Executive reported that no petitions had been
received under Standing Order 36. |
|
Transforming SEND and Inclusion in Leicestershire. PDF 514 KB Minutes: The Committee considered a report of the Director of
Children and Family Services which provided an update on the Transforming SEND
and Inclusion in Leicestershire (TSIL) programme. It set out the activity
undertaken since commencement in August 2022, achievements, progress made and
an overview of the current High Needs Block financial position. A copy of the
report marked ‘Agenda Item 8’ is filed with these minutes. The Chairman welcomed Stephen Knight and Ashley Page from
Newton Europe for this item. In response to concern regarding the cost of delivering the
programme and costs associated to working with the strategic partner, Newton
Europe, the Director explained that the decision to work with an external
strategic partner had been made as the Council did not have the right capacity
and expertise to deliver the complexity of changes required. Therefore, a
strategic partner had been commissioned in order to
work with them on the programme. Members were assured that Newton Europe had
the knowledge to deliver complex change across systems and had experience of
transforming services within local authorities. The Director went on to explain
that Leicestershire had a high number of children supported in specialist
provision, and that the TSIL programme would address demand and delays within
the assessment process for Education, Health and Care
Plans (EHCPs) and decrease the deficit within the High Needs Block budget. Arising from discussion, the following points were raised: i.
The Department had been focussed on delivering
changes to the High Needs Block since 2017. However, diagnostic work carried
out by the programme partner Newton Europe identified that it had not gone far
enough in making improvements for children and families. The TSIL programme
would aim to transform the whole SEND system, in collaboration with partners,
to make services more efficient and to ensure that children would receive the
correct level of support within an appropriate environment. ii.
The TSIL programme would aim to reduce delays
experienced within the SEND system by reducing the time taken to carry out
assessments and allocating an accurate level of support the first time. The
Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman had been concerned about delays
within the SEND system, that the service had not always delivered sufficient
placements for children, and with the high levels of complaints received. The
TSIL programme would focus on addressing these concerns. iii.
The Director explained that parents would be
engaged earlier in the assessment process and would receive clear information,
which would give them more confidence in the process and enable them to
understand how a decision had been reached regarding the package of care for
their child. This was particularly important when the decision had been made to
meet a child’s needs in a mainstream school. For those children, it was also
important to make sure that the additional support they would need for a
placement in mainstream school to be successful was available. iv.
Reporting on EHCP data was based on national
statistics across the SEND system. There was concern regarding growth in demand
which was higher in Leicestershire when compared to other authorities and
members noted that there were a variety of reasons for this, including funding
issues. Leicestershire was the lowest funded local authority and as a result
schools across Leicestershire had less funding available to support children in
mainstream education, despite their will to ensure children are supported well
in mainstream schools. Changes to the demographic in Leicestershire and
expectations nationally regarding what EHCPs can deliver were also driving
demand. RESOLVED: That the update provided on the Transforming SEND and Inclusion in Leicestershire (TSIL) programme, including the activity ... view the full minutes text for item 59. |
|
Stable Homes Built on Love. PDF 268 KB Minutes: The Committee considered a report of the Director of
Children and Family Services which provided an overview of the Government’s
strategy for Children’s Social Care Reform – Stable Homes, Built on Love, published
on 2 February 2023 for consultation. A copy of the report marked ‘Agenda Item
9’ is filed with these minutes. In response to question regarding the impact of statutory changes
to children’s social care, the Director explained that the Department had
actively fed into recommendations and hoped to be part of national work to
understand how the changes would impact children and families. The Service
would continue to highlight the challenges within the social work workforce. Concern was raised regarding the level of funding available
to deliver the proposed changes to children’s social care, the Director
explained that it was not yet clear what funding would be available for the
Council to deliver the proposed changes. Initially, funding would be given to
pilot organisations. The Service was concerned about funding due to the
Council’s financial position, but this would need to be balanced against
delivering the correct support for children and families. Members noted that
much of the proposed changes would require additional funding. Arising from discussion, the following points were raised: i.
The Department offered a flexible route into
kinship caring and provided a lifelong package of training and support to
kinship carers. Within the model, when a child could not remain with their
parents, wider family and friends could provide an alternative to becoming
looked after. Members noted that kinship caring could pose a challenge to local
authorities as they would be responsible for providing funding, even in
circumstances where the placement had not been arranged by the local authority. ii.
The Service had been part of regional work in
utilising alternatively qualified staff to support looked after children. A
qualified social worker had continued to undertake the assessments and have
robust oversight of the package of care, but the skills and experience of
alternatively qualified staff had been useful in providing ongoing support. Positive
feedback on the new model had been received from families and partners. The
Service would await clarification as to whether the Government would make
changes to the robustness around social work oversight and hoped to contribute
to this work. iii.
Local Authorities could bid to become one of
twelve Families First for Children Pathfinders and it was anticipated that the
successful authorities would be a mix of top tier, district
and unitary authorities, as well as authorities with different Ofsted gradings.
The pathfinders would be closely monitored by Department for Education (DfE)
and the Service would work DfE to influence the development of the programme.
The Department would consider whether it should apply to be a pathfinder but
would need to understand the criteria and determine whether it would be an
appropriate decision for the Service and its service users. iv.
No proposals have been shared with the
Department to indicate that existing legislation would be changed. It was
anticipated that the proposed changes would sit alongside existing legislation. v.
Multiagency work to support the needs of care
leavers would continue to be challenging, but the Service would work closely
with partners to ensure that they understood and committed to their collective
responsibilities as corporate parents. All partners would be required to
consider how this review would affect the provision of their services. District
councils understood their corporate parenting responsibilities, especially
regarding housing and worked well with the service to deliver for care leavers.
vi. The proposed reforms set out a wider range of support for children with mental health. ... view the full minutes text for item 60. |
|
Quarter 3 2022/23 Performance Report. PDF 145 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee considered a joint report of the Chief
Executive and the Director of Children and Family Services which presented an
update on the Children and Family Services Department’s performance for the
period to September 2022 (Quarter 3). A copy of the report marked ‘Agenda Item
10’ is filed with these minutes. The Director highlighted the high percentage of children
becoming subject to a child protection plan for a second or subsequent time, an
issue which was being experienced by a number of
authorities nationally. The Department would work towards understand themes
around the circumstances which had led to repeat periods of child protection
planning. Arising from discussion, the following points were made: i.
Members welcomed the increase in the percentage
of Care Leavers in Education, Employment or Training, which was related to work
conducted by the children’s social care service in collaboration with education
colleagues, and through the Virtual School programme, to encourage and support
children to reach their educational and career aspirations. ii.
In relation to the increase in the number of
eligible two-year-olds having taken up their Funded Early Education Entitlement
(FEEE), members noted that there had been an increase in the number of parents
returning to work and that this could have impacted the increase in take up. iii.
All performance indicators had been developed
locally by the Department, but members noted that 18 of them were they are
closely aligned to what was required to be submitted within statutory
reporting. Members were pleased to note that there were no performance
indicators with a red RAG rating despite challenging circumstances being dealt
with by the Department. RESOLVED: That the Children and Family Services Department’s
performance for the period to December 2022 (quarter 3) be noted. |
|
Date of next meeting. The next meeting of the Committee is scheduled to take place on 6 June 2023 at 14:00pm. Minutes: RESOLVED: That the next meeting of the Committee would take place on 6 June 2023 at 14:00pm. |