Venue: Sparkenhoe Committee Room, County Hall, Glenfield. View directions
Contact: Ms. C. Tuohy Email: (cat.tuohy@leics.gov.uk) 0116 305 5483
No. | Item |
---|---|
Minutes: The minutes of the meeting held on 9 November 2021 were taken as read, confirmed and signed. |
|
Question Time. Minutes: The Chief Executive reported that no questions had been received under Standing Order 34. |
|
Questions asked by members under Standing Order 7(3) and 7(5). Minutes: The Chief Executive reported that no questions had been received under Standing Order 7(3) and 7(5). |
|
To advise of any other items which the Chairman has decided to take as urgent elsewhere on the agenda. Minutes: There were no urgent items for consideration. |
|
Declarations of interest. Minutes: The Chairman invited members who wished to do so to declare any interest in respect of items on the agenda for the meeting. No declarations were made. |
|
Declarations of the Party Whip. Minutes: There were no declarations of the party whip. |
|
Presentation of Petitions. Minutes: The Chief Executive reported that no petitions had been received under Standing Order 35. |
|
To advise of any other items which the Chairman has decided to take as urgent elsewhere on the agenda. Minutes: There were no urgent items for consideration. |
|
Medium Term Financial Strategy 2022/23 - 2025/26 PDF 449 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: The Committee
considered a joint report of the Director of Environment and Transport and the
Director of Corporate Resources which provided information on the proposed 2022/23
to 2025/26 Medium Term Financial Strategy (MTFS) as it related to waste, the
environment and the green agenda. A copy of the report marked ‘Agenda Item ‘9’
is filed with these minutes. The Chairman
welcomed Mr. N. Rushton CC, Leader of the Council, to the meeting for this
item. The Committee was advised that there was an error in the
numbering of some of the savings items within the report and the appendix, but
that the references within the table to the title of each saving were correct
and comparable. Arising from the discussion the following points were noted: Growth i.
Conversion of the County Council’s diesel fleet
to Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil would significantly reduce carbon emissions from
the fleet. The Committee was assured that the change would be done in a managed
way to ensure resilience against any unforeseen circumstance, in the new
financial year, subject to approval of the MTFS by Full Council. ii.
Following the increase in kerbside collected
waste as a result of the pandemic, it was queried whether there was a
corresponding decrease in commercial waste. In response the Director informed
the Committee that while the County Council was not responsible for commercial
waste, it did handle a low level through its waste transfer stations. It was
noted that commercial waste in that regard had recovered. The Department would
look to capitalise on any opportunities available to it. Savings iii.
Through a contract renewal the existing contract
for disposal of wood had been renegotiated which delivered £0.4million of
savings. iv. The
Authority had struggled for a number of years with its waste disposal
resilience following the closure of the Cotesbach Mechanical Biological
Treatment facility, that left it without a local all-weather solution to
dispose of its waste, i.e. if a landfill site was closed due to high winds.
This meant the distance needed to travel to redirect its residual waste could
be greater. This would be managed through the reletting of contracts and the
new Bardon Waste Transfer Station which would provide further resilience and
increased holding capacity additional to Whetstone and Loughborough Transfer
Stations. v.
The Director assured Members that the Department
remained committed to progressing reuse initiatives as part of its Recycling
and Household Waste sites service approach. It was noted progress had stalled
as a result of staffing and market issues related to the pandemic, but that infrastructure
had been put in place at some sites to facilitate it. Prior to the pandemic the
item had been profiled over six years to achieve £200,000 income, however the
business case would need to be refreshed and the savings reprofiled as the
market recovered. Capital Programme vi.
It was clarified that, in relation to the
Kibworth site redevelopment, the total scheme cost was £5.5million, a portion
of which had already been funded, with the remaining £2 million set out within
the Capital Programme for 2022/23. The Site was expected to open Autumn 2022. . RESOLVED: (a)
That
the report and information now provided be noted; (b)
That
the comments now made be forwarded to the Scrutiny Commission for consideration
at its meeting on 31 January 2022. |
|
Net Zero Carbon 2045: A Roadmap for Leicestershire PDF 342 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee considered
a report of the Director of Environment and Transport which updated Members on
the Council’s response to the climate emergency, and advised on the key
findings from the Net Zero Carbon 2045 roadmap and an overview of the approach
to develop the Council’s Net Zero Strategy and Action Plan. A copy of the
report marked ‘Agenda Item ‘10’ is filed with these minutes. Arising from the discussion the following points arose:-
i.
The County
Council’s pledge to achieve net zero across the county by 2045 could not be
achieved by the Council alone. As part of the development of the Net Zero
Strategy and Action Plan it needed to consider its own role in place leadership
to create a holistic approach to tackle climate change.
ii.
Members
recognised that like the County Council, most districts had declared climate
emergencies and set aside funding, or at least aspired, to address climate
issues. In developing its roadmap, the Authority would work with existing
partnerships, and look to support organisations such as parish and town
councils that may not have the skills or experience available, which was
welcomed by the Committee.
iii.
Members
were assured that the Authority would consider where gaps existed in its
partnership work and use other mediums, such as the potential development of a
Citizen’s Assembly, to engender awareness and action with the public as well as
local organisations.
iv.
Ongoing
initiatives were highlighted and welcomed by the Committee, such as wildflower
verges and the development of a tree nursery, as well as positive partnership
work with the City Council following the funding the City had received from
Government for their electric bus fleet. v.
It was recognised that the County Council had
limited resource available to it alone. Instead it needed to focus on working
with other organisations and the public to show it was in their best interests
financially and environmentally to take positive action towards carbon
neutrality. vi.
A member emphasised that the drive to net zero
was not only about carbon reduction, but had overall health benefits too.
Further commenting on the importance of a joined up approach and messaging,
having noted the balance between coronavirus measures to ventilate schools and
the need to heat them, which resulted in increased energy consumption. vii.
The
Committee welcomed local initiatives and good practice reported by Members,
such as the local Brooksby Melton College’s free Climate Change and
Environmental Awareness Course, that promised to plant a tree for every course
completed. viii.
As part of the Authority’s pledge to become a
carbon neutral county by 2045 the County Council had promised to plant 700,000
trees, recognising their importance in
providing positive benefits for
the environment, clean air and biodiversity. To enable the public to
monitor its progress the Council had developed an interactive tree map and form
where individuals could record trees that had been planted. Members noted the
Council’s website also included further information on tree species and
planting advice and how to get involved. ix.
It was projected that the county could lose up
to half a million Ash trees due to Ash Dieback. Of those, 140,000 were on
highway verges under the Authority’s ownership. To manage the disease the
County Council had launched its own Action Plan through work with the Tree
Council, and undertook monitoring and annual surveys whilst taking appropriate
action following its risk based approach. The Director informed Members that
officers also supported private landowners to help ensure they were aware of
the condition of their trees and had access to relevant information on the
matter. x. In response ... view the full minutes text for item 36. |
|
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Report 2020-21. PDF 315 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee
considered a report of the Director of Environment and Transport which provided
details of the Council’s greenhouse gas emissions 2020-21. A copy of the report
marked ‘Agenda Item ‘11’ is filed with these minutes. Arising from the discussion the following points were
raised:- i.
A Member
questioned the exclusion of data related to schools under local authority
control, or other Council buildings such as Sure Start centres. In response the
Committee noted that the report included direct emissions and purchased
electricity resultant from the owned and leased assets and operations where the
Council was responsible for the purchase of energy or fuel. Schools or Sure
Start centres that had alternative energy arrangements were not included due to
the complexity in procurement and funding arrangements. Such cases would be
covered as scope 3 emissions and would be addressed as part of the Council’s
unmeasured emissions and wider Leicestershire emissions roadmap. The Director
agreed to take away the issue and consider how potential data gaps on local
authority maintained schools could be addressed as part of future reports. ii.
Around
5,000 recycled tyres had been used as part of highway maintenance road surfacing,
as a carbon friendly alternative to landfill. The initiative had been funded
using cash from the Department for Transport’s challenge fund to assist with
Covid-19 recovery. The Council had researched the benefits which would be
evidenced over the life of the scheme and were expected to last at least a
decade. The County Council would continue to look where innovative low carbon
technologies were possible in any major reconstructions it undertook. The Leader of the County Council concluded the item
highlighting the importance of the Authority’s place leadership role in
empowering organisations such as parish councils to support reduction in
greenhouse gases, and evidencing benefits to residents. It was emphasised that
if the County Council were to receive a County Deal it could further build on
its green agenda and carbon reduction programme through its innovative
enterprises. RESOLVED: That the Committee note the Greenhouse Gas Report 2020-21. |
|
Environmental Performance Report 2020-21. PDF 435 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee
considered a report of the Director of Environment and Transport which provided
details of the Council’s environmental performance for 20201-21. A copy of the report
marked ‘Agenda Item ‘12’ is filed with these minutes. Arising from the discussion the following points arose:- i. The Director reported that electricity consumed per m2 in County Council buildings was ahead of target, yet gas and biomass consumption had increased and was behind target. Members noted that savings in electricity were driven by the closure of some smaller council buildings, however, County Hall remained open and staff worked throughout the building which was heated through its centralised system. ii.
Members
noted that districts had their own dispensations in relation to waste
collected. In response to a query regarding Casepak not allowing comingled
collection of textiles, officers would circulate figures for recycling rates,
though it was recognised there were other outlets for those items. iii. Recycling from Leicestershire County Council office buildings had reduced as a result of the pandemic as less staff were in offices, meaning there was less waste, and the proportion of waste had changed. iv.
In response
to a query on the reduction of the percentage of household waste reused,
recycled or composted it was noted over the years levels had plateaued and
reduced slightly, and that work was ongoing with districts. Members noted that
the Council was developing its Resources and Waste Strategy to be delivered by
the Leicestershire Waste Partnership, which would include Government’s target
of 65% municipal waste recycled by 2035. v.
Government
intended to implement Extended Producer Responsibility for all producers of
packages, putting onus on the manufacturers that packaging was recyclable,
which was expected to change the dynamic of the market. The County Council
would continue to monitor its own position and any impact it may have and
report back to the Committee. vi.
In
response to a question on the 7% reduction in household waste per household the
Director advised that reduced tonnage was likely due to gaps in service
provision, as a result of the pandemic. For instance, the closure of all 14
Recycling and Household Waste Sites for a period, and districts bulky waste and
garden waste collection hiatuses vii. The Authority awaited indicative funding allocation from Government for the Council’s bus service improvement plan, however early indications led to the view that city areas could be the main focus for funding. It was hoped any funding would help the Authority influence a reduction in traffic alongside its fourth iteration of its Local Transport Plan, and the Department for Transport’s decarbonising transport plan. RESOLVED: That the Committee note the Environmental Performance Report 2020-21. |
|
Date of next meeting. The next meeting of the Committee is scheduled to take place on Tuesday 1 March 2022 at 2.00pm. Minutes: RESOLVED: It was noted that the next meeting of the Committee would be
held on 1 March 2pm. |