Venue: Sparkenhoe Committee Room, County Hall, Glenfield
Contact: Anna Poole (tel: 0116 305 2583) Email: anna.poole@leics.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
Minutes of the previous meeting. PDF 95 KB Minutes: The minutes of the meeting held on 2 November 2023 were taken as read, confirmed and signed. |
|
Question Time. Minutes: The Chief Executive reported that no questions had been received under Standing Order 34. |
|
Questions asked by members. Minutes: The Chief Executive reported that no questions had been received under Standing Order 7(3) and 7(5). |
|
Urgent items. Minutes: There were no urgent items for consideration. |
|
Declarations of interest. Minutes: The Chairman invited members who wished to do so to declare any interest in respect of items on the agenda for the meeting. No declarations were made. |
|
Declarations of the Party Whip. Minutes: There were no declarations of the party whip in accordance
with Overview and Scrutiny Procedure Rule 16. |
|
Presentation of Petitions. Minutes: The Chief Executive reported that no petitions had been received under Standing Order 35. |
|
Medium Term Financial Strategy 2024/25 - 2027/28. PDF 336 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: The Committee
considered a joint report of the Director of Environment and Transport and the Director
of Corporate Resources which provided information on the proposed 2024/25 to
2027/28 Medium Term Financial Strategy (MTFS) as it related to the Environment
and Waste Management Services within the Council’s Environment and Transport
Department. The report also sought the Committee’s views on proposals to
recommend to the Cabinet that the Council’s net zero target dates be revised
from 2030 to 2035 for the Council’s own emissions, and from 2045 to 2050 for
the County’s emissions, in light of the Council’s
wider financial position. A copy of the report, marked ‘Agenda Item 8’, is
filed with these minutes. The Chairman
welcomed Mr. B.L. Pain CC, Cabinet Lead Member for the Environment and the
Green Agenda and Mr. N. J. Rushton CC, Leader of the Council to the meeting for
this and other items. In presenting the
report, the Director explained that the environment aspects of the MTFS related
to the Environment and Transport Department only and not the wider
environmental activity across the Council. Arising from
discussion, the following points were raised: Revenue Budget
i.
The
premium paid as part of the package to recruit and retain HGV drivers had
helped the Council to be more competitive in the marketplace, although it could
not compete with the attractive offers made by the bigger private sector
operators in the area. Staffing overall was near full complement with the use
of the premia and agency staff, but in such a competitive market, it was a
challenge. Overall, the service was coping from a driver perspective by paying
the premium and by using agency staff. However, there was a shortage of
managers and frontline staff. Overall, 20% of vacancies were currently filled
by agency staff. The Department
preferred to keep the level of agency staff to 10%. Other amendments had been
made to the recruitment package, such as changing contractual hours to a four
day on/four day off contract, which reflected what was offered in the wider
marketplace and enabled the Council to compete.
ii.
Regarding
the free disposal of DIY waste following the change in legislation from 1
January 2024, Members expressed concern about the volume that households could
now potentially deposit at RHWS which would increase the Council’s costs and
were informed that households were restricted to four visits in a four-week
period. Growth iii.
Pre-existing
arrangements were in place to manage the disposal of asbestos at certain
Council Recycling and Household Waste Sites (RHWS), and details were available on
the Council’s website for the public to follow. This was not charged for at the
same rates but had been included in the new process now in place linked to the
legislation for the disposal of DIY waste. All items known to include asbestos,
including artex, were covered within these
arrangements with a need to have a permit for removal and disposal for health
and safety reasons. Savings/Savings
under Development
iv.
The
income from the sale of items from the RHWS for reuse was included under ET9
‘service approach’, which was a broad description in the budget and included
savings linked to reuse of items. The Director agreed to amend the descriptor
for clarity. v. Members expressed concern that income from the disposal of trade waste could be reduced if traders used the new legislation for the disposal of DIY at RHWS to dispose of their waste. The Director assured members that trade waste services were only available at Whetstone Transfer Station and that it had a unique trade point in the market. The RHWS ... view the full minutes text for item 43. |
|
Environmental Performance Report 2022-23. PDF 167 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: The Committee
considered a report of the Director of Environment and Transport which provided
information on progress made in delivering the Council’s commitments to net zero
and gave information on the performance of the Council’s Environmental
Management System for 2022-23. The report also gave an update on progress in
delivering the aims and objectives of the Council’s Environmental Strategy
2018-2030. A copy of the report, marked
‘Agenda Item 9’, is filed with these minutes. In presenting the
report, the Director explained that the report included the Council’s
environmental performance, progress towards achieving net zero and greenhouse
gas emissions and related to the Council’s progress in delivering the existing
2030 and 2045 targets. Arising from
discussion, the following points were raised:
i.
Regarding
the increase in office mileage claimed, Members were informed that claims made
were for petrol, diesel and electric vehicles (EV). When completing the claim,
staff were asked to specify the type of car, so figures could be compiled for
the level claimed for journeys made by EVs if this was required. The
performance figures in the report were compared to the period during the pandemic
when there had been very little travel undertaken by staff, hence the increase
in office mileage shown. However, the current mileage claims were less than
those made pre-pandemic. Data showed that there was a rise in the number of
claims made for EVs, as more staff purchased such vehicles.
ii.
A
Member expressed concern that the biomass boiler had not been working recently.
It was explained that it was currently running and Members were informed that
this method of generating energy was well proven and was a strong contributor
to the Council’s renewable activities. There had been issues previously with
sourcing parts for the boiler with delays experienced as parts were sourced
from Germany. Additionally, it had been challenging to source parts during the
pandemic, as with parts for other pieces of equipment.
iii.
In
response to Members concerns about the significant decline in the number of
Leicestershire rivers, from 99.6% to 0%, which were in good chemical status,
the Director explained that this was due to a change in the Government’s
methodology for calculating the data. Members were informed that data for the
county was in line with national performance. The County Council relied on
other agencies, for example the Environment Agency, water companies, etc. to
support achievement of the performance targets in this area. The County Council
did not have a specific target on river water quality but did contribute to the
achievement of the national target.
iv.
Members
asked that the Environment Agency and Severn Trent be invited to attend a
future committee meeting as a follow up to their previous visit to enable the
Committee to understand what was happening to Leicestershire rivers and what
could be done to rectify the situation. The Director agreed that this was
possible but added that clarity was needed about what would be discussed with
them and Members would need to collate questions for submission to these
organisations in advance.
v.
Regarding
the solar PVs, Members were informed that 10.9% of electricity used by the
County Council had been generated from its solar PVs. The Council had
considered the feasibility of installing rainwater harvesting equipment at
County Hall about 10 years ago but had found that the costs of installation
were exorbitant and so had not proceeded. However, the Council did consider
installing solar PVs on new buildings and had installed them on the building
for the Access Group, in Loughborough. vi. The Director explained that the actions detailed in the report for ... view the full minutes text for item 44. |
|
Date of next meeting. The next meeting of the Committee is scheduled to take place on Monday 11 March 2024 at 2.00pm. Minutes: RESOLVED: It was noted that the next meeting of the Committee would be held on Monday 11 March 2024 at 2.00pm. |