Venue: Sparkenhoe Committee Room, County Hall, Glenfield
Contact: Mr B G Cave (Tel. 0116 3056016) Email: geoff.cave@leics.gov.uk
| No. | Item |
|---|---|
|
Also in attendance Mr. D. Houseman
CC, Mr. J. T. Orson JP, CC, Dr. R. K. A.
Feltham CC, Mr. S.J. Galton CC, Mrs. P. Posnett CC. |
|
|
Minutes of the previous meeting. Minutes: The minutes
of the meeting held on |
|
|
Urgent items. Minutes: There were no
urgent items for consideration. |
|
|
Declarations of Interest. Minutes: The
Chairman invited members who wished to do so to declare any interest in respect
of items on the agenda for the meeting. Mr. J. B.
Rhodes and Prof. M. E. Preston each stated that they had previously expressed a
view on the planning application which was the subject of Paper 'H' and would
not participate in the debate when this item was considered. They would also leave the room when it was
discussed. The matter was considered
under minute 161 below. |
|
|
Additional documents: Minutes: The Cabinet
considered a report of the Director of Children and Young People's Service on
the outcomes of the statutory notice representations period for the proposed
closure of The
Chairman reported that Mr. P. Roffey, CC ( Mr. Ould, CC and Mr. White, CC spoke in favour of the
recommendations in papers 'B' and 'BB'. RESOLVED: (a) That
the objections received to the statutory notice from the governing bodies of
King Edward (b) That
the following proposals under paragraph 8 of Schedule 2 to the Education and
Inspection Act 2006 be approved: (i) The
closure of King Edward (ii) The
expansion of John Ferneley College to a capacity of 1100 pupils and an
admission number of 220 with effect from 1 September 2010; (c) That
the progress to date on the establishment of the joint management and
governance arrangements of the new Melton Post-16 Centre and proposals for the
Hub, as detailed in the supplementary report, be noted; (d) That
the further action proposed in respect of the establishment of joint
collaborative arrangements from 1 September 2011 (as set out in the
supplementary report) be agreed. (KEY
DECISION) REASON FOR
DECISION: The Cabinet
approved the publication of a statutory notice proposing the closure of The
programme of re-organisation for schools in Melton and the Vale of Belvoir
represents a long-term commitment by the County Council to transform the
schools and to raise standards for the pupils. It provides a long-term,
sustainable solution for the Melton and Vale of Belvoir Partnership, clearly
addressing the issues of removing surplus places. The establishment of a jointly managed Post-16 Centre is in keeping with the decision of the Cabinet in March 2007 and will help ensure that the three secondary schools in the Partnership and other key education partners are fully involved in post-16 provision. Early establishment of these joint ... view the full minutes text for item 155. |
|
|
County Council Medium Term Delivery Plan to 2013. Additional documents:
Minutes: The Cabinet
considered a report of the Chief Executive on the new draft Medium Term Delivery
Plan. A copy of the report, marked 'C',
is filed with these minutes. RESOLVED: (a) That
the comments of the Scrutiny Commission be noted; (b) That
the proposed amendments to the Medium Term Delivery Plan, set out in Appendix 1
to the report, be approved; (c) That
the revised Medium Term Delivery Plan, attached as Appendix 2 to the report, be
approved for submission to the County Council at its meeting on 19 May 2010;
and (d) That
it be agreed that the targets be reviewed and updated in 2011 when the current
Local Area Agreement ends and the new Local Transport Plan is published. (KEY DECISION) REASON FOR
DECISION: To enable
the MTDP to be considered by County Council at its meeting on |
|
|
Youth Justice Strategic Plan 2010/11. Additional documents: Minutes: The Cabinet
considered a report of the Chief Executive on the draft Youth Justice Strategic
Plan 2010/11. A copy of the report, marked
'D', is filed with these minutes. RESOLVED: That the
Youth Justice Strategic Plan 2010/11 be approved for submission to the County
Council on (KEY
DECISION) REASON FOR
DECISION: The County
Council has a statutory duty under Section 40 of the Crime and Disorder Act
1998 to prepare and submit an annual Youth Justice Plan to the Youth Justice
Board. |
|
|
Final Equality, Diversity and Human Rights Strategy. Additional documents:
Minutes: The Cabinet considered a report of the Chief Executive
on the new Equality, Diversity and Human Rights Strategy. A copy of the report, marked 'E', is filed with
these minutes. RESOLVED: That the Equality, Diversity and Human Rights Strategy
be approved for submission to the County Council on (KEY DECISION) REASON FOR
DECISION: To enable the Equality, Diversity and Human Rights
Strategy to be considered by full Council at its meeting on 19 May 2010. |
|
|
Dates of County Council Meetings 2010/11. Minutes: The Cabinet
considered a report of the Chief Executive setting out the proposed dates of
County Council meetings for 2010/11. A copy
of the report, marked 'F', is filed with these minutes. RESOLVED: That the
County Council be recommended to hold meetings on the following dates during the next municipal year - REASON FOR
DECISION: To comply with the Local Government Act 1972 and the County Council’s
standing orders. |
|
|
Minutes: The Cabinet considered a
report of the Chief Executive advising of urgent action taken, in consultation
with the Leader and Deputy Leader, in respect of the County Council
underwriting a shortfall in funding for the Harborough Innovation Centre
scheme. A copy of the report, marked
'G', is filed with these minutes. RESOLVED: That the action taken by
the Chief Executive in agreeing to underwrite a shortfall in funding of up to
£200,000 for the Harborough Innovation Centre, Market Harborough, be noted. REASON FOR
DECISION: The General
Scheme of Delegation requires that any urgent action taken by the Chief
Executive between meetings be reported to the next appropriate meeting of the
body concerned. |
|
|
Additional documents:
Minutes: Mr. Rhodes
and Prof. Preston, as stated in minute 154 above, had previously expressed a
view on this matter and left the meeting during discussion of this item. The Cabinet
considered a report of the Chief Executive setting out the Development Control and
Regulatory Board's recommended response to a planning application on which the
County Planning Authority has been consulted by Charnwood Borough Council. A copy of the report, marked 'H', is filed
with these minutes. Copies of a
letter from the applicant company commenting on the recommended response were
circulated at the meeting and a copy is filed with these minutes. The Chief Executive commented on the letter
by advising that the County Council acknowledged the evolving nature of
renewable energy policy and technologies, and that more challenging targets may
emerge in the future. The direction of
future Government policy and the progress of the Partial Review of the East
Midlands Regional Plan had been taken into account in the recommended response. It was noted that, in the letter, the
applicant did not acknowledge, or attempt to address, the impact of the
development on nearby historic assets, local landscape character and the wider
open countryside. RESOLVED: That the
following be forwarded to Charnwood Borough Council as the views of the County
Planning Authority:- "Charnwood
Borough Council be advised that the CPA objects to the proposed development on
the following grounds - The County
Planning Authority acknowledges that there is general support for the principle
of development for renewable energy projects set out in national and regional
policy guidance, particularly In light of
the present operational and consented capacity within the region, the need does
not outweigh the harm to nearby significant historic assets and the harm to
local landscape character and the wider open countryside, which is in conflict
with Policy CT/7 of the Charnwood Borough Local Plan. Unless
certain details are agreed with the Highways Authority on the precise
improvements to facilitate the development, there appears to be some doubt
about the suitability of the local road network to accommodate the additional
trip generations to/from the site, including significant numbers of HGVs in the construction period. Therefore unless suitable details are
provided by the applicant to the Highway Authority, at the present time the
application is contrary to Policy TR/6 of the Charnwood Borough Local
Plan." REASON FOR
DECISION: To comply
with Regulations issued under the Local Government Act 2000. Reasons for the
recommendations on this particular application are set out in the appendix to
this report. |
|
|
Minutes: The Cabinet
considered a report of the Director of Corporate Resources seeking authority to
extend a contract with RESOLVED: That
approval be given to granting an extension to a contract awarded
to REASON FOR
DECISION: Rule 30a of
the Contract Procedure Rules (Part 4G of the Constitution) requires that where
a contract is originally approved by the Executive and where the duration of the planned extension is more than three
months, then authority must be gained from the Executive. In this
instance a compliant tendering procedure was commenced but subsequently stopped
(in consultation with the Eastern Shires Purchasing Organisation) due to
unforeseen issues relating to the Invitation to Tender document. It is considered important to ensure that
training continues in key leadership skills for the cohort who will join the
course on 1st June 2010. |
|
|
Items referred from Overview and Scrutiny. Minutes: There were
no items referred from Overview and Scrutiny. |