Venue: Sparkenhoe Committee Room, County Hall, Glenfield
Contact: Miss. G. Duckworth (Tel. 0116 305 2583) Email: gemma.duckworth@leics.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
Webcast and Order Paper. A webcast of the meeting can be viewed at https://bit.ly/2NKDhFz Additional documents:
|
|
Minutes of the previous meeting. Minutes: The minutes of the meeting held on 26 April 2022 were taken as read, confirmed and signed. |
|
Urgent items. Minutes: There were no urgent items for consideration. |
|
Declarations of interest. Minutes: The Chairman invited members who wished to do so to declare any interest in respect of items on the agenda for the meeting. No declarations were made. |
|
Provisional Revenue and Capital Outturn 2021/22. Additional documents:
Minutes: The Cabinet considered a report of the Director of Corporate Resources which set out the provisional revenue and capital outturn for 2021/22. A copy of the report, marked ‘Agenda Item 4’, is filed with these minutes. The Director referred to an
additional recommendation which reflected concern about the affordability of
the Capital Programme and rising inflation.
District Councils (as the local planning authorities) needed to be aware
that this would affect the County Council’s ability to provide infrastructure
to support growth. Mr. Breckon CC acknowledged the
good financial outcome for the year despite the challenges faced by all
departments. He agreed with the use of
the previous year’s underspend and alluded to the importance of fairer funding
from the Government. RESOLVED: (a) That the 2021/22 provisional revenue and
capital outturn be noted; (b) That the prudential indicators for 2021/22
as shown in Appendix E to the report be noted; (c)
That
the increasing pressures on the Capital Programme be noted with concern and
that, in regard to
infrastructure required to support housing and economic growth in the delivery
of District Local Plans: i)
The
affordability of major road schemes (A511 and Melton Mowbray Distributor Road
North and East sections) included in the Capital Programme will be reviewed
when contract prices are received; ii)
In the
case of the other highway schemes not in the Capital Programme, financial risk
will be managed by the County Council only committing to construction upon
receipt of funds from developers, noting that increased congestion may result,
although the County Council as local highway authority will seek to mitigate
the impact through the formal planning process; iii)
In the
case of education provision, (i) the County Council will meet its statutory
requirement to provide school places, whilst (ii) financial risk will be
managed through stronger risk transfer to developers, noting that additional
school places required may have to be through transport of pupils to existing
schools; and iv)
The
District Councils as the promoters and owners of Local Plans be advised accordingly; (d) That the net underspend of £7.9m be used for
the additional commitments as specified in the report, namely – £3.6m – budget
equalisation reserve for additional risks, £1.1m –
contribution to the Transformation earmarked fund, £3.2m – budget equalisation
reserve, for the increased risk of inflation. (KEY DECISION) REASONS FOR DECISION: To note the provisional revenue and
capital outturn for 2021/22. To advise local planning authorities of the increasing
pressures on the Capital Programme, particularly in regard to
infrastructure required to support housing and economic growth in the delivery
of District Local Plans. The use of the underspend as indicated will help address
some of the financial risks. |
|
Draft Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Carers Strategy 2022-25. Additional documents:
Minutes: The Cabinet considered a joint report of the
Director of Adults and Communities, Director of Children and Family Services,
and Director of Public Health which detailed the outcome of engagement with
carers and sought approval to consult on the draft joint Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Carer’s Strategy 2022-25. A copy of the report, marked ‘Agenda Item 5’,
is filed with these minutes. Mrs. Radford CC emphasised the importance of
carers. Mrs. Taylor CC stressed the need
to support young carers and to ensure that they engaged with the consultation. RESOLVED: (a) That the outcome of the engagement report findings, attached as Appendix A, be noted; (b)
That
the draft joint Leicester, Leicestershire, and Rutland (LLR) Carers Strategy
2022-2025, attached as Appendix B, be approved for a formal six-week joint consultation; (c) That
the draft Leicestershire Action Plan, attached as Appendix D, be noted (to be
published alongside the draft Strategy during the consultation period); (d) That
a further report be submitted to the Cabinet
in the autumn presenting the outcome of the consultation, the final LLR Carers
Strategy and supporting action plan for approval. REASONS FOR DECISION: An engagement
exercise undertaken during the summer of 2021 demonstrated that Leicestershire
Carers continue to identify with the priorities contained in the 2018-2021
Strategy. The Directors of
Adults and Communities, Children and Family Services and Public Health require
the Cabinet’s approval to undertake a formal joint consultation alongside the
partner Councils and CCGs on the priorities and actions identified for
supporting unpaid carers. Amendments may be
required to the draft Strategy following the consultation and approval of these
is a matter for the Cabinet. |
|
Minutes: The Cabinet considered a report of the Director of Adults and
Communities which advised of urgent action taken by the Chief Executive to
agree an exception to the Council’s Contract Procedure Rules and directly award
contracts to suppliers providing minor adaptations. A copy of the report, marked ‘Agenda Item 6’,
is filed with these minutes. RESOLVED: That the Cabinet notes the urgent action taken by the Chief Executive to
directly award by exception, in accordance with Contract Procedure Rule
6b(ii), contracts for a period of six months (to commence by no later than 31
May 2022) and with an option to extend by two additional periods of no more
than three months each, to deliver minor adaptations for older and disabled
people at home. REASONS FOR
DECISION: The Council’s Constitution (Contract Procedure Rule 6 (b))
provides that exceptions to the Contract Procedure Rules may be made by the
Cabinet where it is satisfied that an exception is justified on its merits and
that in urgent cases the Chief Executive (after consultation with the Leader or
Deputy Leader save where this is not practicable) may direct that an exception
be made subject to it being reported to the Cabinet. The exception was necessary because the current contract
with the four providers had already been extended previously and a further
extension is not possible if compliance with the Public Contract Regulations
2015 is to be maintained. The direct
award of the contract will be compliant with the Regulations and allow the
necessary time to undertake a full re-procurement. |
|
Minutes: The Cabinet
considered a report of the Director of Children and Family Services seeking
approval for an exception to the Council’s Contract Procedure Rules for the
direct award of contracts to a number of holiday
activity providers to supply holiday clubs for the 2022 school summer holiday
period, under the Department for Education Holiday Activities and Food (HAF)
programme. A copy of the report, marked
‘Agenda Item 7’, is filed with these minutes. RESOLVED: That an exception
to the Contract Procedure Rules is agreed to enable the Director of Children
and Family Services to approve the direct award of
contracts to suppliers to supply Holiday Activities and Food holiday club
provision for the 2022 summer holiday period, with a
maximum, combined potential spend of £800,000. REASONS FOR
DECISION: The County Council’s Contract Procedure Rules require that,
where the estimated value of a contract exceeds £181,302, formal tenders must
be invited. Where an exception to the Contract Procedure Rules is
required for contracts over £177,897, Rule 6 (b)(ii) provides that Cabinet
approval be obtained to the exception where this is justified on its merits.
The proposed contracts with selected
suppliers are expected to have a total value of £800,000. The circumstances and financial considerations surrounding
the proposal, explained in Part B of the report, mean that other procurement
processes are not possible in order to ensure delivery
of the HAF programme during the 2022 summer holiday period. There is insufficient time to undertake a full procurement
process to put in place contracts for the start of the school summer holidays
(12 July 2022). Work is taking place with the Commissioning Support Unit,
Legal Services and the Children and Family Services Department’s Commissioning
Service to undertake a procurement exercise (compliant with the Council’s
Contract Procedure Rules and the Public Contract Regulations 2015) to award
contracts for the remainder of the HAF programme, from winter 2022 to 2025. |
|
Minutes: The Cabinet
considered a report of the Director of Public Health seeking approval to make a
direct award of a contract to two existing providers of hostel-based and
outreach-based support services for adults at risk of, or experiencing,
homelessness. A copy of the report,
marked ‘Agenda Item 8’, is filed with these minutes. RESOLVED: That the Cabinet
approves the direct award of hostel-based and outreach-based support services
to Nottingham Community Housing Association and Falcon Support Services for the
period 1 July 2022 to 31 March 2024. REASONS FOR DECISION: The direct award
will enable continuity of service provision using existing service providers
whilst allowing time to review the provision as part of service
recommissioning. The Nottingham
Community Housing Association and Falcon Support Services have been delivering
elements of the existing provision via subcontract arrangements with the lead
provider (who does not wish to extend their contract) and this will give
continuity of provision. |
|
Items referred from Overview and Scrutiny. Minutes: There were no items referred from the Overview and Scrutiny bodies. |
|
Exclusion of the Press and Public. The press and public are likely to be excluded during the
following items of business in accordance with Section 100(A) of the Local
Government Act 1972:- · East Midlands Development Company Limited Minutes: RESOLVED: That under Section 100A of the Local Government Act 1972,
the public be excluded for the following item of business on the grounds that
it involves the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in Paragraph
3 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A of the Act and that, in all circumstances of the
case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public
interest in disclosing the information – ·
East Midlands Development Company Limited. |
|
East Midlands Development Company Limited. (Exempt under Paragraphs 1, 3 and 10) Minutes: The Cabinet considered an exempt
joint report of the Chief Executive, Director of Corporate Resources and
Director of Law and Governance regarding the County Council’s membership of the
East Midlands Development Company in light of concerns
about the Company’s management and governance.
A copy of the report, marked ‘Agenda Item 12’, is filed with these
minutes. The report was not for publication by virtue of Paragraphs 3 and 10 of
Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972. The Chief Executive referred to an
additional recommendation regarding governance arrangements. RESOLVED: (a)
That the Cabinet records its concerns about
the management and governance of the East Midlands Development Company as set
out in this report; (b) That those concerns be drawn
in the first instance to the attention of the other local authority members of
the Company at statutory officer level, the local authorities being the owners
of the Company, prior to communication with the Company; (c) That the reply from the
interim Chair of the Company to the letter from the Director of Law and
Governance of 29 April and her subsequent letter be noted; (d) That the Director of Law and Governance
be requested to write a further letter to the interim Chair of the Company
setting out the County Council’s view that he has a conflict of interest in
respect of any matters relating to the East Midlands Freeport being discussed
by the East Midlands Development Company Board given his role as the Chairman
of a separate company which owns land in another Freeport; (e) That the Company be informed
that the County Council is pausing its engagement with the Company pending
resolution of its concerns and will not be considering a response to the
Company’s Funding Notice until written responses to letters from the Director
of Law and Governance and any other response from the Company have been
considered by the Cabinet; (f) That the Company and the other
member authorities be informed of the County Council’s view that a meeting of
the Company Oversight Authority be called to coincide with consideration of the
findings of Tranche 1 of the work of the Company’s commercial partner so that
the political leaderships of the member authorities and their executive bodies
can give consideration to what is being recommended in
respect of the Company’s role and in Tranche 2 of their work; and (g) That the County Council does
not support at this time a Memorandum of Understanding
between the Company and the East Midlands Freeport or any convergence of their
governance arrangements. REASON FOR
DECISION: It is necessary to
consider the County Council’s membership of the Company at the end of the first
year of operation in its current form, to seek information and justification
for the proposed funding from the County Council of £500,000 per annum and to
recognise the engagement by the Company of a commercial partner. |
|
In attendance In attendance. Mr. R. Ashman CC, Mrs. B. Seaton CC, Mrs. M. Wright CC, Mrs. A. J. Hack CC, Mr. M. Mullaney CC, Mr. J. Poland CC. |
|
Apologies Apologies for absence were reported on behalf of Mr. B. Pain CC and Mr. R. Shepherd CC. |