Venue: Goscote Committee Room, County Hall, Glenfield
Contact: Miss H.M. Millward (Tel: 0116 265 6038) Email: hmillward@leics.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
Appointment of Chairman. Minutes: RESOLVED: That Mr. D. R. Parsons, CC be appointed the Chairman of the Constitution Committee for the period ending with the date of the Annual Meeting of the County Council in 2006. |
|
Appointment of Deputy Chairman. Minutes: RESOLVED: That Prof. M. E. Preston
– in the Chair |
|
Minutes: The minutes of the meeting of the Constitution Committee held
on |
|
Question Time. Minutes: The Chief Executive reported that no questions had been asked under Standing Order 35. |
|
Questions asked by members under Standing Order 7(3) and (5). Minutes: The Chief Executive reported that no questions had been asked under Standing Order 7(3) and 7(5). |
|
Any other items which the Chairman has decided to take as urgent. Minutes: There were no other items of urgent business. |
|
Declarations of Interest. Minutes: There were no declarations of interest. |
|
Declarations of Party Whip. Minutes: There were no declarations made under Overview and Scrutiny Procedure Rule 16. |
|
Presentations of Petitions under Standing Order 36. Minutes: The Chief Executive reported that no petitions had been received under Standing Order 36. |
|
Statement of Accounts for 2004/05. PDF 52 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: The Committee considered a
report of the Director of Resources presenting the Statement of
Accounts for 2004/05. A copy of the
report marked ‘B’ is filed with these minutes. Arising from discussion, the
following points were raised: ·
Members sought
clarification as to why provision for bad debts had reduced from £1.6m in
2003/04 to £0.8m in 2004/05. The reduction in this provision reflected that
outstanding claims with Transco for delays in the completion of work on the
highway had largely been resolved and some of this debt had been recovered. ·
Members
expressed concern at the significant level of increase in school balances which
had risen from £15.8m in 2003/04 to £21.1m in 2004/05. Members acknowledged
that some of the capital would be for specific projects which were awaiting
approval but felt that action should be taken to manage school balances. The
Schools Funding Forum had agreed that schools would be consulted on a scheme to
control school balances. ·
Part of the increase
in school balances related to capital schemes and it was suggested that this
might be an appropriate topic for a scrutiny review. ·
It was queried
whether the requirement to make efficiency savings in light of the Gershon
Enquiry had been taken into consideration in the budget process. The Committee
was informed that this requirement had been taken account of and would become
inbuilt into the way in which future budgets were set. ·
In response to a
question, the Committee was informed that the £0.5m identified for
organisational change was to oversee the implementation of projects that would,
in the future, generate savings, for example, the call centre and electronic
records management. ·
The County
Council’s external auditor had recently changed to Price Waterhouse Coopers who
appeared to be taking a stricter line than the Council’s previous Auditor. It appeared likely that even relatively minor
errors (anything over £1000) in the Statement of Accounts would now need to be
brought to the Committee’s attention. RESOLVED That the Statement of
Accounts for 2004/05 be approved. |
|
Statement on Internal Controls for 2004/05. PDF 17 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee considered a
report of the Director of Resources presenting the Statement on
Internal Controls for 2004/05. A copy of
the report marked ‘C’ is filed with these minutes. RESOLVED That the Statement on
Internal Controls for 2004/05 be
approved. |
|
Minutes: The Committee
considered a report of the Chief Executive enabling the Committee to discuss
possible arrangements for the appointment by the County Council of Honorary
Aldermen. A copy of the report marked ‘D’ is filed with these minutes. RESOLVED: (a) That this Committee supports the principle of the appointment of Honorary Aldermen by the Council on the basis as set out in the report and that the Council be informed accordingly; (b) That the Chairman of the
Council be requested to agree to the holding of an extraordinary meeting of the
Council for the purpose of appointing Honorary Aldermen immediately prior to
the next ordinary meeting of the Council on 13 July 2005; (c) That the Council be requested to consider conferring the title of Honorary Alderman on individuals it considers have rendered eminent services to the Council; (d) That the Chief Executive be authorised to take all necessary action relating to the appointment by the Council of Honorary Aldermen and the participation of Honorary Aldermen in civic ceremonies and similar events. |