Venue: County Hall, Glenfield
Contact: Mrs J Twomey (tel: 0116 305 2583) Email: joanne.twomey@leics.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
Minutes of the previous meeting. PDF 170 KB Minutes: The minutes of the
meeting held on 24th October 2018 were taken as read, confirmed and
signed. |
|
Question Time. Minutes: The Chief Executive
reported that no questions had been received under Standing Order 35. |
|
Questions asked by members under Standing Order 7(3) and 7(5). Minutes: The Chief Executive reported that no questions had been received under Standing Order 7(3) and 7(5). |
|
Urgent Items. Minutes: There were no urgent items for consideration. |
|
Declarations of interest. Minutes: The Chairman invited members who wished to do so to declare any interest in respect of items on the agenda for the meeting. No declarations were made. |
|
Treasury Management Strategy Statement and Annual Investment Plan. PDF 323 KB A
presentation by Link, the Council’s Treasury Management Advisors, will be
provided as part of this item. Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee
considered a report of the Director of Corporate Resources regarding the
Treasury Management Strategy Statement and Annual Investment Strategy
2019/20. A copy of the report, marked
‘Agenda Item 6’, are filed with these minutes. The Committee also
considered a presentation provided by Link Asset Management (Link), the County
Council’s Treasury Management Advisors, which set out the role it played in
advising the Council on Treasury Management activities and the role of the
Committee in relation to Treasury Management oversight. A copy of the presentation is filed with
these minutes. The Chairman
welcomed Richard Dunlop of Link to the meeting.
Arising from the
discussion on the presentation by Link, the following key points arose:- (i)
Government
had expressed concerns regarding the activities of some authorities who were
borrowing heavily to invest in commercial property. Whilst guidance had been issued by CIPFA and
MHCLG this was unclear. In this regard
the County Council was in a different position in that it had not borrowed to
invest in the property market; (ii)
CIPFA
guidance prioritised security and liquidity of Treasury Management investments
above the rate of return; (iii)
The Council’s
current risk appetite was described as ‘cautious’ and no Treasury Management
investments had been made with any bank without a good credit rating. This was
judged on a range of indicators, including at least an ‘A’ rating by Standard
& Poor. In respect of the
Annual Treasury Management Strategy Statement and Annual Investment Strategy
for 2019/20, the Committee was advised as follows:- (iv)
Inclusion
of non-ring fenced banks on the approved counterparty list provided they had
passed Link’s financial assessment allowed for a broader base for
investment. All necessary due diligence
would be undertaken and the risk would not be greater than lending to a ring
fenced bank; (v)
The
investment criteria for property purchases and developments were set out in the
Corporate Assets Investment Fund Strategy.
This did not include a policy in respect of in-County and out-of-County
property investments. The majority of
investments made were in-County on the basis that they generated both an income
for the Council and contributed to economic development and growth. Where property investments were made out-of-County these were normally
in neighbouring authority areas. RESOLVED: (a)
That the
Treasury Management Strategy Statement and Annual Investment Strategy 2019/20
be noted. (b)
That a
comparison of the credit ratings of ring-fenced and non-ring-fenced banks be
presented at the next meeting of the Committee. |
|
Quarterly Treasury Management Update. PDF 319 KB Minutes: The Committee
considered a report of the Director of Corporate Resources which set out the
actions taken in respect of treasury management in the quarter ended 31
December 2018. A copy of the report,
marked ‘Agenda Item 7’, is filed with these minutes. The
Committee was advised that the loan of £5million to Northampton County Council
had now been repaid with interest. RESOLVED: That the contents of
the report be noted. |
|
External Audit Plan 2018/19. PDF 292 KB John Gregory from the County Council’s external
auditors, Grant Thornton UK LLP, will attend for this item. Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee
considered a report which presented the External Audit Plan for 2018/19. A copy of the report marked, ‘Agenda Item 6’,
is filed with these minutes. The Chairman
welcomed John Gregory and Avtar Sohal
of Grant Thornton, the County Council’s external auditors, to the meeting. Arising from
discussion, the following points were noted: (i)
Materiality was determined by a number of
factors which included the Council’s gross expenditure and assessment of the
Council’s ability to secure value for money.
On this basis, materiality had been set at 2% of gross expenditure, i.e.
£14million; (ii)
The audit of the valuation of land and buildings
was based on an assessment of the management processes and assumptions for
calculating the estimate and the competency and capability of the valuer. Only in very
exceptional circumstances would the Auditor commission an independent
valuation. RESOLVED: That the contents of
the report be noted. |
|
Business Continuity Annual Report. PDF 385 KB Minutes: The Committee
considered a report of the Chief Executive which provided an annual update on
the Council’s resilience and business continuity activities and work undertaken
with other authorities in Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland on such
activities. A copy of the report, marked
‘Agenda Item 9’, and the presentation slides are filed with these minutes. Arising from
discussions the following points were noted: (i)
All district councils were part of the
Resilience Partnership and contributed financially to it. The LRF worked
closely with and provided officer support to all districts in helping develop
their business continuity plans; (ii)
The LRF worked with parishes who wished to
develop local resilience plans. In non-parished areas
it was up to local community or voluntary sector groups to take the lead on
such matters and the LRF would work with them. Currently there 47 local plans
in place; (iii)
The County Council has been working closely with
the MCHLG on Brexit planning. The key focus has been on the freight operations
at East Midlands Airport. Other areas of work involved the impact on health and
social care services and on support to small businesses. Given the uncertainty,
drawing up precise and costed plans was difficult. RESOLVED: That the contents of
the report be noted. |
|
Risk Management Report. PDF 514 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: The Committee
considered a report of the Director of Corporate Resources, the purpose of
which was to provide an overview of key risk areas and the measures being taken
to address them. A copy of the report, marked ‘Agenda Item 10, is filed with these minutes. Arising from
discussions the following points were noted: (i)
Risk 1.8 (risk to the Council’s financial
position and services if public sector
partners and major providers of public services get into financial difficulty)
- Members were advised that the focus would be on financial plans and
deficits in maintained schools. With
regard to other suppliers and their stability there was close monitoring, but
it would not be possible to eliminate this risk completely; (ii)
Risk 10.1 (risk to parental confidence in the ability of the ‘whole system’ to meet the
needs of children with SEND in a mainstream school context if the
Authority and its partners do not succeed in developing an inclusive culture across all schools, education providers and partner
agencies (including the Parent Carer Forum)) - Maintained schools and
academies had responded positively to the SEND consultation currently underway
to develop additional capacity within Leicestershire; (iii)
Risks 7.2 and 7.3 - (risk of recruitment and
retention of staff within the Adults and Communities Department resulting in a
reliance on agency staff and ensuring it has a sustainable external workforce
to meet the Council’s statutory responsibilities) work was underway to address
the issue of recruitment and retention and consideration was being given to the
introduction of market supplements. RESOLVED: (a)
That the contents of the report be noted; (b)
That the current status of the strategic risks
and emerging risks facing the Council, the Risk Management Healthcheck
and insurance and counter fraud, be noted; (c)
That a presentation and report be provided for
the next meeting of the Committee on Risk 10.1 – Special Educational Needs and
Disability (SEND); (d)
That the Revised Risk Management Policy
Statement and current Risk Management Strategy remain fit for purpose and be
attached as an Appendix to the Medium Term Financial Strategy 2019-2023 and
presented to the Cabinet and County Council in February; (e)
That it be noted that the Risk Management
Strategy will be reviewed in detail during 2019 taking into account the outcome
of the health check undertaken by a consultant from Risk Management Partners
and the outcome reported to a future meeting of the Committee. |
|
Internal Audit Service Progress Report. PDF 303 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: The Committee considered
a report of the Director of Corporate Resources which summarised the work of
Leicestershire County Council’s Internal Audit Service (LCCIAS) finalised since
the last report to the Committee, highlighted audits where high importance
recommendations had been made and provided a brief overview of the resources of
the Internal Audit Service. A copy of
the report, marked ‘Agenda Item 11’, is filed with these minutes. RESOLVED: That the contents of the report be noted; |
|
Date of next meeting. The
next meeting of the Committee is due to be held on Friday 10th May
2019 at 10am. Minutes: RESOLVED: That the next
meeting of the Committee be held on Friday 10th May 2019 at 10:00am. |