Venue: Guthlaxton Committee Room, County Hall, Glenfield. View directions
Contact: Miss C Tuohy (0116 305 5483). Email: cat.tuohy@leics.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
Chairmans Announcement. Minutes: The Chairman and all members of the Committee thanked Mr. R.
Bone for his long standing commitment and contribution
to the Leicestershire Pension Fund as an employee representative which ended
following the Fund’s Annual General meeting. |
|
Minutes: The minutes of the meeting held on 8 November 2019 were
taken as read, confirmed and signed. Following questions from Mr. Z. Limbada concerning the
proposed Financial Strategy Statement (FSS) and the potential financial impact on
certain employers, the Director of Corporate Resources reassured the Committee
that the Authority continued to engage with employers concerning their proposed
contribution rates and any outstanding issues would be resolved prior to the
employer contribution rates coming into effect on 1 April 2020. |
|
Question Time. Minutes: The Chief Executive reported that no questions had been received under Standing Order 35. |
|
Questions asked by members. Minutes: The Chief Executive reported that no questions had been received under Standing Order 7(3) and 7(5). |
|
Declarations of interest. Minutes: The Chairman invited members who wished to do so to declare any interest in respect of items on the agenda for the meeting. No declarations were made. |
|
Urgent items. Minutes: There were no urgent items for consideration. |
|
Responsible Investment Plan 2020. PDF 491 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee considered a report of the Director of Corporate
Resources which sought approval for a Responsible Investment (RI) Plan 2020
which set out the Fund’s approach to improving its management of responsible
investment risks. A copy of the report marked “Agenda Item 6” is filed with
these minutes. The Director informed Members that the term responsible
investment referred to the integration of financially material environmental,
social and corporate governance factors into investment processes. RI had
relevance both before and after a decision to invest and was a core part of the
Fund’s fiduciary duty. Arising from the discussion the following points were
noted:- i)
Officers would bring the items listed within the
Plan to the Committee for consideration as they became available, such as the
Climate Risk report which could be expected in Q3 of 2020/21. ii)
The Director informed members that RI reporting
would initially focus on the Fund’s investments managed by LGPS Central
(Central) and Legal and General Investment Management (LGIM), with a scope to
increase reporting from individual investment managers in the future. Members
were pleased that RI reporting was being improved and felt it would enable the
Committee to have a wider oversight of the Fund’s activities. iii)
LGPS Central’s RI approach focused on engagement
with investment managers rather than exclusion. This allowed the fund the
opportunity to influence companies RI behaviour through stewardship, rather
than waive that ability through a divestment approach. This was standard across
the pools. iv)
LGPS Central, LGIM and the Fund’s other
investment managers had the ability to hold the companies to account, greater
than the Fund could as a single entity. Pooling of resources enabled a stronger
voice to engage, which was further enhanced through LGPS central’s use of
Hermes, an active asset manager with a
focus on positive engagement and intervention to improve RI performance and
sustainability. v)
The Committee felt it would be beneficial for
the Fund to develop its own stance on Environmental Social and Governance (ESG)
factors in order for all investment managers to understand the Fund’s
requirements. The Director informed Members that work was underway to integrate
ESG into manager selection and monitoring. Members thanked officers for producing a comprehensive plan
and looked forward to receiving future reports on the matter. RESOLVED: a)
That the Responsible Investment Plan 2020 be
approved; b)
That the Director of Corporate Resources be authorised
to make any necessary minor alterations following the Local Pension Board’s
consideration of the Plan. |
|
Overview of the Leicestershire Pension Fund Asset Allocation Strategy. PDF 471 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: The Committee considered a report from the Director of
Corporate Resources which provided an overview of the Fund’s current strategic
investment allocation activity in year and a summary of the proposed future
allocation. A copy of the report marked “Agenda Item 7” is filed with these
minutes. Arising from the discussion the following points were
noted:- i)
Since the last review of the strategy in January
2019 the Fund had transferred its active listed global and emerging markets
equities to LGPS Central’s (Central) equivalent products; and entered into an
agreement with Central to provide advisory services for its Property, Targeted
Return and Emerging Market Debt asset classes. ii)
Over the previous year Central had developed a
more formal approach to product development to improve accountability and
delivery through enhanced communication and clarification of responsibility
between Central and each partner fund. This enabled Central to focus its
resources on asset classes that partner funds were most interested in. iii)
The Director of Corporate Resources acknowledged
that pooling had been slower than initially anticipated, resultant from staff
turnover and the complexities involved with pooling across the partner
authorities. Section 151 officers across the partner funds had recognised these
issues and had set up meetings to ensure each authority was aligned in their
approach to ensure collective working. Ultimately the savings originally
presented prior to the pool being established were reliant on each fund
transferring the majority of its assets to LGPS Central. iv) Members
noted that Government had not yet produced statutory guidance following the consultation
in January 2019 regarding LGPS asset pooling. It was expected, considering the
direction of the consultation, that upcoming guidance would stipulate future
investments would need to be attained through pooling, not via the fund’s own
individual manager appointments. In the meantime, the Fund would keep a
consideration of its allocations with a view to invest in Central as products
were developed. It was considered most cost effective to utilise Central’s
services as much as it could, due to its cost of running. v)
Virtually all of the Fund’s equity asset classes
were pooled through Central’s investment services, advisory services or Legal
and General Investment Management (LGIM) passive management. LGIM’s services
were deemed cost-effective and it was not proposed to move the mandate to
Central as it would be unlikely to generate a cost saving. vi) The
Fund had previously committed £10million to LGPS Central’s Private Equity Fund,
however following the loss of the Investment Director no product was launched
for 2019/20. The Investment Subcommittee, at its meeting on 16 October 2019,
agreed to commit £30million to Adams Street Partners to maintain the Fund’s
allocation to Private Equity. vii)
The Investment Subcommittee had also agreed at
its meeting on 16 October 2019 to commit £100million to Partners Group Fund V
in the absence of a developed Private Credit product from Central. The Director
reiterated that any future investment in Private Credit would also be dependent
on government guidance. The Director informed the Committee that Private Credit
was a relatively new investment line that had arisen following the banking
crises, and while it had performed well for the Fund since its inception it was
unlikely that opportunity for yield would always be there. viii)Central were providing the advisory services for the Fund’s Property Assets which made up 9% of the Fund’s total assets as at 30 September 2019. Work was ongoing by Central to look at the potential for partner funds to transfer existing assets into a Property Asset Fund. Any potential costs to the fund’s would be considered as part of product development and a business ... view the full minutes text for item 8. |
|
Exclusion of the Press and Public. The public are likely to be excluded during consideration of the remaining itemt in accordance with Section 100(A)(4) of the Local Government Act 1972 (Exempt Information). |
|
Annual Review of the Asset Strategy and Structure. Minutes: The Committee considered a report of the Director of
Corporate Resources which was accompanied by appendices produced by the Fund’s Investment
Consultants Hymans Robertson. The report recommended a number of changes to
Leicestershire Fund’s strategic investment benchmark and portfolio structure. A
copy of the report marked “Agenda Item 10” is filed with these minutes. The
report and appendices were not for publication by virtue of Paragraphs 3 and 10
of Part 1 of Schedule 12(A) of the Local Government Act 1972. Representatives from Hymans Robertson provided the rational
for the recommended changes set out in the report and responded to questions
from the Committee regarding the Fund’s revised strategic benchmark. The
Committee were advised the changes presented evolution, rather than revolution
and would help the Fund achieve its overall objectives. RESOLVED: a)
That the revised strategic benchmark for the
Fund, as shown below, be approved; b)
That the Investment Subcommittee consider, over
the course of 2020, the changes necessary to align the Fund’s investment with
the revised strategic allocation; c)
That the Investment Subcommittee be also asked
to consider, over the course of 2020, the product launches by LGPS Central or
other investment managers, and if necessary, the appropriate commitments to be
made by the Fund, including the investments to divest; d) That the current notional exposure of £340million to the Millennium currency overlay be terminated. |