Venue: Sparkenhoe Committee Room, County Hall, Glenfield
Contact: Mrs J Twomey (Tel: 0116 305 2583) Email: joanne.twomey@leics.gov.uk
| No. | Item |
|---|---|
|
Webcast. A webcast of the meeting can be viewed here. |
|
|
Declarations of interest. Minutes: The Chairman invited members who wished to do so to declare any interest in respect of items on the agenda for the meeting. No declarations were made. |
|
|
Declarations of the Party Whip in accordance with Overview and Scrutiny Procedure Rule 16. Minutes: There were no declarations of the party whip. |
|
|
Efficiency Review - Outcomes and Revised Transformation Programme Additional documents:
Minutes: The Commission considered a
report of the Director of Corporate Resources regarding the outcomes of the
County Council’s Efficiency Review (ER) and which set out the implications for
the Council’s revised Transformation Programme and the Medium Term Financial
Strategy (MTFS). A copy of the report
marked ‘Agenda Item 3’ is attached to these minutes. The Chairman welcomed Stephen
Knight, Mandeep Mohan and Dominic Ansbro from Newton Consulting Ltd (Newton) to
the meeting and thanked them on behalf of the Commission for their work on the
review. The Chairman also welcomed to the
meeting Mrs N. Bottomley CC, Mr M. H. Charlesworth CC, and Mr J. Miah who had
been invited to attend for this item. At the invitation of the
Chairman, the Leader introduced the proposals commenting that, following the
change in administration after the County Council elections, the new
administration had inherited a significant budget gap of £90 million and had
therefore decided to commission a root and branch efficiency review of Council
spending, income and procurement. He reported that the review aimed to identify
opportunities to maximise efficiencies, to enable the Council to live within
its means, and to reduce and ultimately eliminate budget deficits over time, as
well as protect valued frontline services. Members were advised that this
represented a clear change from previous ways of working, including a council
tax increase of 2.99%, described as the lowest in over a decade. Investment in
social care teams, earlier intervention, support to keep children with their
families, and improved contract value would also improve outcomes and reduce
longer-term costs. The Leader outlined that savings
of £33.4 million had originally been built into the budget, which had been
increased to £44 million through work with officers, and that external
consultants had worked with the Council to identify further potential savings
of up to £60 million, contributing to an overall target of £102.6 million. He
further stated that, after a three-year payback period, the savings delivered
through the programme would deliver recurring annual financial benefits. The Leader advised that proposals
for local government reorganisation could also, if a single council model for
Leicestershire and Rutland was introduced, release a further £40 million and
provide a financially viable basis for a new authority. The Leader further commented that in his
view, the measures proposed would place the Council at the forefront of
innovative local government and support improved services alongside financial
sustainability. The Lead Member for Resources
supported the Leader’s comments and explained that the efficiency review had
been established to take a fundamental look at how the Council operated, with
the aim of identifying savings whilst also improving services. He emphasised
that, notwithstanding criticism of its ambition and scope, the independent
review had produced a rolling programme of action expected to deliver payback
within around three years, target £60 million of savings, and continue to
identify additional opportunities in the future. The Lead Member further stated that in his
view, the proposals provided the best opportunity to secure improved outcomes
and financial sustainability for residents. Arising from questions asked of
the Leader and the Leader Member for Resources, the following points were made: (i)
In response to questions as to whether the
appointment of external consultants had been necessary the Leader highlighted
that their involvement had brought a fresh perspective, drawing on experience
from a range of organisations and sectors. He
suggested that their wider organisational view had enabled additional
opportunities to be identified beyond those visible within individual service
departments. (ii) Regarding concerns about the interaction between the efficiency programme and the timing of local government reorganisation (LGR) the ... view the full minutes text for item 94. |
|
|
Date of next meeting. The next meeting of the Commission is scheduled to take place on 10 June 2026. Minutes: RESOLVED: It was
noted that the next meeting of the Commission would be held on *** at ***
am/pm. |