FLOODING
(a) That this Council notes:-
(i) that it has recognised the
importance of the environment and climate change in previous debates on these
matters;
(ii) the Climate Change agenda is likely to force the Council to change
its priorities and allocation of resources;
(iii) that whilst flooding has always been an issue in localised
areas, the perception is that flooding is becoming both more severe and more
widespread.
(b) That the Council recognises:-
(i) the progress made by the County Council and others to tackle
flooding in the County since the Easter 1998 floods and the publication of the
Bye Report;
(ii) that more needs to be done in the County on flood prevention
and alleviation;
(iii) that this is best done in partnership within the County
involving districts and other agencies;
(iv) that solutions
have to be cost effective;
(c) That the Council requests the Cabinet to take steps to ensure
that:-
(i) the County Council not only plays its full part in flood
prevention through its work with drains, gullies, bridges and highways work,
but takes a leadership role in a campaign on flooding within the County
including, if necessary, taking powers under the 1991 Land Drainage Act;
(ii) a
multi-agency ‘Leicestershire Flood Task Force’ of limited duration is
established comprising the County Council, relevant district councils, the
Environment Agency, Severn Trent, the Council's representative on the Flood
Levy Board and others to be chaired by a cabinet member with County Council
members drawn from councillors whose areas have been affected by flooding;
(iii) the
Task Force produces a map of flooding incidents in the County and draws up a prioritised list with actions and
timescales for each area, the priorities depending in part on the number of
dwellings, businesses, public buildings and others that have been flooded or
are at risk;
(iv) the Task Force assigns responsibilities for these actions between
the relevant members of the Task Force and where appropriate member support
each other in bidding for funding to resolve these issues;
(v) Riparian land owners are reminded of
their responsibilities;
(vi) In pursuing plans for housing and other development, risk from flooding will be an important factor in assessing suitability for development and that Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS) including for example porous pavement technology are included in such plans to ensure they are as near ‘water neutral’ as is possible.
Minutes:
It was moved by Dr O'Callaghan and seconded by Mr Sheahan:
"(a) That this Council notes:-
(i) that it has
recognised the importance of the environment and climate change in previous
debates on these matters;
(ii) the Climate Change agenda is likely to force the Council to
change its priorities and allocation of resources;
(iii) that whilst flooding has always been
an issue in localised areas, the perception is that flooding is becoming both
more severe and more widespread.
(b) That the
Council recognises:-
(i) the progress made by the County Council
and others to tackle flooding in the County since the Easter 1998 floods and
the publication of the Bye Report;
(ii) that more needs to be done in the County on flood prevention
and alleviation;
(iii) that this is best done in partnership
within the County involving districts and other agencies;
(iv) that solutions have to be cost effective;
(c) That
the Council requests the Cabinet to take steps to ensure that:-
(i) the County Council not only plays its
full part in flood prevention through its work with drains, gullies, bridges
and highways work, but takes a leadership role in a campaign on flooding within
the County including, if necessary, taking powers under the 1991 Land Drainage
Act;
(ii) a
multi-agency ‘Leicestershire Flood Task Force’ of limited duration is
established comprising the County Council, relevant district councils, the
Environment Agency, Severn Trent, the Council's representative on the Regional
Flood Defence Committee and others to be chaired by a cabinet member with
County Council members drawn from councillors whose areas have been affected by
flooding;
(iii) the Task Force produces a map of flooding incidents in the
County and draws up a prioritised list
with actions and timescales for each area, the priorities depending in part on
the number of dwellings, businesses, public buildings and others that have been
flooded or are at risk;
(iv) the Task Force assigns responsibilities for these actions
between the relevant members of the Task Force and where appropriate members
support each other in bidding for funding to resolve these issues;
(v) Riparian
land owners are reminded of their responsibilities;
(vi) In
pursuing plans for housing and other development, risk from flooding will be an
important factor in assessing suitability for development and that Sustainable
Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS) including for example porous pavement technology
are included in such plans to ensure they are as near ‘water neutral’ as is
possible."
An
amendment was moved by Mr Parsons and seconded by Mr Rushton:
'That the
motion be amended to read as follows:-
"(a) That a time-limited response, as proposed
in the motion proposed by Dr O'Callaghan, is unlikely to have any meaningful or
worthwhile impact;
(b) That
in contrast, effective management of flooding and attendant risks can only be
achieved through a strategic and co-ordinated approach in line with existing
structures at sub-regional and regional levels, on which the County Council and
its partners are already represented;
(c) That,
accordingly and in order to assist the ongoing development of such an approach,
the report to Cabinet which will identify priorities for immediate expenditure
on improvements to highways drainage systems also address the relevant
responsibilities of local authorities and public sector agencies; the role of
the Local and Regional Resilience Forums in respect of flooding; issues already
identified for remedial action and improvement; and the outcomes of the Pitt
Report commissioned by the Government following the summer floods of
2006." '
Arising
from comments by Mrs Sherwin, the Leader undertook to have regard to the work
of the Scrutiny Review Panel on the County Council's Environment Policy and Programmes
in taking this matter forward.
The
amendment was put and carried, 31 members voting for the motion and 11
against.
The
substantive motion was put and carried.