The
Police and Crime Commissioner has been invited to
attend for a discussion on this item.
Minutes:
The Chairman welcomed to the meeting Sir Clive Loader, the Police and Crime Commissioner for Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland (the PCC) to discuss his plans for the future management arrangements for Leicestershire Police.
In introducing the item, the PCC read out a statement in regard to the absence of the Chief Constable, Simon Cole and the arrangements that had been put in place to ensure the effective management of Leicestershire Police in his absence. The statement read as follows:
“Chairman Orson,
members of the panel – you have requested that I come today to outline the
Future Management Arrangements for Leicestershire Police. This I will do by means of a statement as
follows:
Firstly, for those of
you who are not ex-members of the Police Authority and perhaps even for those
who are, it would be helpful to outline for you the Command and Control
structure of the Leicestershire Police Force, so that you can understand what
is in place, why it is there, and thereby place my decisions into their proper
context.
All Chief Constables
have a formal, single Deputy Chief who is legally empowered to take on the
role, duties and responsibilities of the Chief when the latter is away for
whatever reason – leave, courses, or indeed sickness. Many duties of the Chief Constable are
singularly theirs – by which I mean that only the individual who is holding the
legal responsibility at the time can discharge them. Good examples would be the authority to
intercept communications, or to instigate surveillance operations, in certain
instances and at certain scales. Of course,
the Chief’s duties are much broader than that: setting the strategic direction
for the Force; instilling (and insisting upon) professional standards; indeed,
acting as the visible and professional leader of the Force and, in so doing,
inspiring and creating confidence (both within the Force and with the public at
large); and of course representing the Force at many public engagements.
The Deputy Chief, in
addition to taking on the roles of the Chief in the latter’s absence, acts
somewhat as a Chief Operating Officer – for example, by monitoring the Force’s
performance on a very regular basis (DCC Edens chairs the Performance Delivery
Group, which tracks the Force’s achievements against the Police and Crime
Plan), leading on risk and audit, and on professional standards, as well as
taking on those duties and decisions that aren’t the sole bailiwick of the
Chief. Of course the Deputy Chief also
acts as a support, advisor and confidant of the Chief. As I know from my own past, the symbiotic,
mutually supportive and honest relationship between a Chief and their Deputy is
a powerful arbiter as to the success of a Force as a whole. We are very lucky in having an officer with
the quality and experience of Simon Edens – more of which later.
In addition to the
Chief and his Deputy, there are 2 Assistant Chief Constables, in our case both
selected during my time as PCC and having both come into post in June of this
year. As many of you will be aware, we
had been running light on an ACC in this Force for a considerable period of
time (albeit we had two very capable temporary holders in the form of Paul
Telford and Chris Thomas), so one of these appointees was to provide the
permanent ACC which we needed, whilst the other was to provide a replacement
for ACC Steph Morgan (who had announced earlier her
intention to retire as of early July of this year). Whilst the exact duties that ACCs hold varies
between Forces, here at Leicestershire, we have one (now Roger Bannister) whose
title is ‘ACC Crime’ – i.e. his primary focus is on the prevention, and solving,
of crime in the broadest sense. Of note,
Roger had already served some 18 months as an ACC in the Lincolnshire Force
before coming to us. The other ACC, Phil
Kay (who came to us from the West Midlands Force), is ‘ACC Operations’, being
responsible for the wider running of the Force (e.g. training, overseeing the
operational BCUs, and being responsible for policing in its widest sense (for
example dogs, firearms, and Contact Management – as well as being the lead on
neighbourhood policing, and so on). But
it would be wrong to characterise their roles as in any way solely restricted
to those primary areas of responsibility.
They both bring great experience to this Force and that knowledge is put
to the fullest use as they play their part in, and contribute greatly to, the
Chief Officers’ Team here.
The final 2 members of
the Force’s top team are the Human Resources Director and the Finance Director
– Ali Naylor and Paul Dawkins respectively; some of you will know them as
well. Paul Dawkins has been with the Force
since 1996 and became Director of Finance in 2002. He oversees a broad portfolio of support
functions including finance, IT and estates.
He is well respected, not only in the Force but also in the region, for
his commitment to collaborative working.
Ali Naylor joined Leicestershire from Northamptonshire Police where she
undertook a similar role and, during her time here, has been instrumental in
leading on collaboration across the HR function. Between them Paul and Ali bring much knowledge
and self-evident professionalism to the senior management and leadership of
this Force.
As regards Chief
Constable Simon Cole himself, in early July I was made formally aware that he
was away from work on the grounds of ill health. I have also stated unequivocally that I am
general looking forward to his return – and that has not changed. However, the exact period that he would need
to recover was always uncertain (it was described as several weeks rather than
several months) and I therefore needed to ensure that robust command and
control arrangements were rapidly put into place to cover Simon Cole’s period
away from the Force.
Fortunately, that need
for cover was confirmed only the day after ACC Steph
Morgan’s farewell evening dinner (prior to retirement) and, in recognising that
we would need her skills for a further period, she very unselfishly volunteered
to stay on as long as we might need her (at some personal cost, by the way –
not least a holiday to Europe that had been planned 2 weeks afterwards). We are extremely lucky to have had her
support for this extended period – with her lengthy experience as an ACC, I had
no hesitation whatsoever in asking her to step up to the role of DCC, whilst
Simon Edens took on the role of temporary Chief. Here again, I was totally confident in his
ability to take on a role that he had already held on several previous
occasions, albeit briefly. Notably,
Simon Edens is an officer of some 34 years’ experience with a vast knowledge of
policing. I knew that he would provide a
balanced and highly intelligent hand at the tiller for as long as we might need
it. They have both already done all that
I could have expected – and more.
And that, perhaps in
lengthier form than you might have wished, is all that I can – or indeed will –
say on this matter. I am unable to tell
you precisely when Simon Cole will return – I still expect that it will be a
few weeks, but I cannot be more precise at this time. What I can be precise about is my utmost
confidence in the team that we have in place in the interim. Were it not so, I would have instigated other
processes, about which I would have told you as and when I felt that
appropriate.
I hope that this
statement assuages any legitimate concerns or interests that this Panel might
have.”
Following the statement, the PCC stated that, given the
sensitivity of the situation, he was unable to answer any personal questions in
relation to the nature of Simon Cole’s illness. In response, the Chairman
indicated that it was the job of the Police and Crime Panel to both support and
scrutinise the PCC and that any questions to be put to him would not be of a
personal nature.
Arising from these questions, the following points were noted:
·
Simon Cole was off work due to ill-health and
the PCC was looking forward to his return to work. In, what he expected to be,
a few weeks’ time. For this reason, he was uncertain how long the present
arrangements would be required for;
·
The PCC had absolute confidence in the abilities
of Simon Edens and had no hesitation in having him fill the role of Acting
Chief Constable, given his 34 years of experience;
·
Assistant Chief Constable, Steph
Morgan, had delayed her retirement in order to take up the post of Acting
Deputy Chief Constable, for which the PCC was extremely grateful. Her
availability was open-ended, though he recognised that it would be unfair to
expect her to extend this arrangement beyond a few months;
·
The key performance indicator for any Chief
Constable was to deliver safe, efficient and effective policing. The PCC had no
concerns that this continued to be the case with the present arrangements and
that, had the new arrangements not been effective, he would have informed the
Chairman of the Police and Crime Panel. He felt that the present arrangements
were robust enough to continue for a reasonable amount of time, but that they
would hopefully not be required to do so;
·
There were no formalised arrangements for
reviewing the new arrangements. This was carried out via daily contact between
the PCC and the Chief Officer team;
·
Staff at the Force had been kept informed as to
the management arrangements and they would be kept regularly up to date in this
regard;
·
The decision to implement the new arrangements
was the decision of the PCC, as was his role to do so. However, this had not
been done without seeking advice from the Home Office and HMIC. He had no
reservations about the way in which the new team had been assembled and he
recognised that any change in Chief Constable would trigger a formal process
which would involve the Police and Crime Panel;
·
Should the Chief Constable return to work, he
would be briefed on what had taken place during his absence.
The PCC pointed out that he had been in regular contact with the Chief
Constable over the phone during his absence;
·
The PCC reported that, in the Chief Constable’s
absence, some of the ancillary roles he had, such as leading nationally on
mental health and community cohesion had had to be deprioritised;
·
The new legislation for PCCs had not impacted on
the ability to formally delegate the powers of the Chief Constable to the
Deputy Chief Constable;
·
The PCC was aware that the statement he issued
to the media on the ongoing absence of Simon Cole could have been
misinterpreted as a “vote of confidence”. He would, shortly, be issuing a new
release to clarify the situation;
·
The PCC remained hopeful that Simon Cole would
return to work within a few weeks’ time, however if this was not to be the
case, consideration had been given to further forward planning of the
situation;
·
The PCP had a role to support the PCC during
this difficult time, but it also would be required to continue to act as a
“critical friend”, adding value to the PCC’s decision-making where it was
appropriate to do so. Though the PCP and the PCC would need to develop a close
relationship, it was important that Panel challenged his decisions rather than
helping him to take them;
·
The Chief Constable had now been absent for 11
weeks. It was noted that, if an illness went beyond 12 weeks, it was regarded
in the health sector to be a “chronic” condition. For this reason, it was
expected that, should Simon Cole return to work as was expected, he would begin
a phased return, taking on duties gradually;
· The PCP indicated that, whilst he hoped that the issue of Simon Cole’s absence and the management arrangements could now be regarded as dealt with, he was happy to bring updates on the situation to the Panel, as and when there was something significant to report.
In closing the item, the Chairman wished to convey the Panel’s best wishes to Simon Cole for speedy recovery and return to work.
RESOLVED:
That the Police and Crime Commissioner be thanked for his attendance.