Minutes:
The Committee considered a report of the Director of Children and Family Services, the purpose of which was to present the performance of the First Response Central Duty Team and the Children’s Social Care Team over the first two quarters of the 2013/14 business year (1 April to 30 September 2013). A copy of the report is filed with these minutes.
Arising from discussion, the following points were noted:
i.
Reassurance was sought that the number of cases being
audited were adequate and proportionate to the number of calls being received
through the service. It was noted that
the auditing of eight case files formed only part of the performance audits
being undertaken and therefore the information detailed in the report
highlighted only a small sample of those cases assessed;
ii.
The Signs of Safety toolkit had been produced
with considerable input from practitioners, making use of their knowledge and
expertise of dealing with difficult cases.
It had been academically verified and was being increasingly used by
partners. Staff had been trained to
ensure they were competent and confident in using this toolkit and feedback had
been very positive. Training was also
available to partners through the Leicestershire Safeguarding Children Board;
iii.
Concern was raised about the difficulties
experienced in obtaining GP support for Adoption Panel meetings and the delay
and distress this caused to families. It
was noted that the Department had sought the requisite paediatric help, but
that, locally, GPs had limited time available to support the Panel on a regular
basis. Action had been taken to try to
commission this support from elsewhere but, at present, this had been
unsuccessful. The matter would be taken
to the Health and Wellbeing Board for further consideration with partners;
iv.
Leicester City Council, following a review and
re-modelling of its own working arrangements, had given notice that it would no
longer be able to provide the Emergency Duty Team service for the County Council’s children and young people’s and adult social
care services. Arrangements had therefore
been made to provide the service in house. However, the number of calls being
received had been higher than expected and therefore, to ensure the service was
resilient for the future, growth funding of £200,000 had been proposed in the
current budget;
v.
The children and young people and adult social
care emergency duty teams were kept separate due to the differing nature and
volume of calls received. The majority
of adult social care cases related to either care packages or mental health
matters. For children and young people,
this focused on protection matters and the need for early help. The expertise required to manage these calls
varied significantly;
vi.
Members applauded the work of the Children’s
Voice project and the film created by the children in care following a visit to
Auschwitz – Birkenau.
Members strongly supported use of the film on a wider basis and the
Chairman requested that members who might have a suggestion for the constructive
use of the film to notify officers;
vii.
The Strengthening Families Team worked solely
with children who were subject to a child protection plan. There was overlap in this Teams approach to
families and that adopted by Family Support Workers under the Supporting
Leicestershire Families (SLF) programme.
The SLF team had recently been transferred to the Children and Young
People’s Service and a review of current structures would be undertaken which
might see these teams working more closely in future. For now, strong links between the two teams
had been established and information was being shared on an ongoing
basis.
RESOLVED:
(a)
That the performance of the First Response
Central Duty Team and the Children’s Social Care Team during the period 1st
April to 30 September 2013 be noted;
(b)
That the work of the Unheard Voices project be
applauded and that the short film created following a visit by the children in
care to Auschwitz-Birkenau be utilised as widely as
possible;
(c)
That a copy of the practice methodology into
children’s social care enitled ‘Signs of Safety’, be
circulated to members for information;
(d)
That a copy of the improvement plan for the
County Adoption Service be circulated to members for information;
(e) That it be noted that issues relating to the availability of GPs to support the County Council’s Adoption Panel would be considered by the Health and Wellbeing Board.
Supporting documents: