Minutes:
Jenny presented the
2015/16 Schools’ Budget paper and explained the purpose of the report was to
present the 2015/16 Dedicated Schools Grant Settlement for Leicestershire and
proposed 2015/16 Schools’ Budget. The
Local Authority was seeking approval for a number of recommendations outlined
in the report.
Jenny highlighted
the following:
· Paragraph
14, item 2 – Jenny referred to the new school funding regulations which fund
new schools on estimated pupil numbers and this would be something that Schools’
Forum would need to consider. Jenny said
that it was anticipated that significant housing developments currently being
planned in Leicestershire by 2020 may deliver 17 new primary and 2 new
secondary schools and commented on the work to be carried out to ensure
financial sustainability. Tony
Gelsthorpe referred to the number of schools and asked if they would all be
commissioned as academies. Lesley said
that all new schools are academies and there would be competition for the
operator of these. Suzanne Uprichard asked if the academies would be part of a
multi-academy trust or stand alone.
Lesley said it would depend on what the potential operator brings to the
table and explained the process for how the final decision was reached.
· Paragraph
14, item 3 - Schools’ Forum are asked to approve the
funding in order for the Local Authority to meet prescribed statutory duties
placed upon it. Jenny commented that new
costs do not fall on the Premature Retirement costs.
· Paragraph
14, item 4 – Schools’ Forum are asked to approve the centrally retained early
years funding of £1.687M
· Paragraph
15 – High Needs Block – still the most complex area within the DSG
settlement. The EFA have changed their
process again for this financial year.
By converting the settlement to a per pupil basis Leicestershire is one
of the lowest funded authorities against the national average.
· Paragraph
15 – Early Years – Jenny outlined the two elements to the Early Years funding
block. The settlement no longer includes
funding for FEEE for 2 year olds and this would not be confirmed until June
2015. Jenny commented that there may be
a cost implication for the 2 year olds offer.
· Paragraph
16 - Leicestershire was approached by the DFE to take part in a research project
to look at how the current SEN funding system was working and to explore the
differences in local authority spending patterns. The outcome of the research project was still
unknown and what potential changes to the funding system may arise from it.
· Paragraph
19 – School Budgets – the additional funding has been incorporated into the
2015/16 funding values
· Paragraph
20 – Jenny said that there had been a slight change in the criteria the DfE had used around prior attainment.
· Paragraph
22 – Jenny commented that there are 23 schools funded at the Minimum Funding
Guarantee.
· Paragraph
24 – Jenny commented that a number of schools were unhappy with the arrangement
regarding pupil number adjustments for schools undertaking age range changes or
affected by age range changes in other schools required by the EFA. Schools said they were not aware of these
changes and had limited understanding of the changes despite implementation
following extensive consultation in 2013.
· Paragraph
26 - Jenny commented that communication of changes continues to be a
challenge. Tim added that as a former
chair of LSH, Forum members used to communicate information into their
representative groups. Tim reiterated
that schools should ask heads, governors and business managers to make sure
information was coming through. Schools’
Forum members gave their view on this issue and suggested ways to improve the
situation.
· Paragraph
30 – Universal Infant Free School Meals – Jenny reported that there was no
information on funding from September 2015.
· Paragraph
32 – Pupil Premium – the Primary Free School Meals value has increased for
2015/16. Pupil numbers will be based
upon pupil numbers the January census.
Confirmed allocations are not expected until June 2015.
· Paragraph
33 – High Needs Funding – The EFA has changed the pupil count methodology. For 2015/16 exceptional cases where there was
identified pupil growth were submitted and as a result there was some growth
for Ashmount Special School.
· Paragraph
42 – Early Learning and Childcare – Jenny outlined how the Early Learning and
Childcare service was funded from DSG but changes to the way in which local
authorities are funded for Free Entitlement to Early Education (FEEE) may
affect this position. This is a further
funding pressure for the Service in addition to savings already to be
made.
· Paragraph
51 – Dedicated Schools Grant Reserve – underspend in SEN and nursery funding,
high needs not there for 2015/16.
Post-16 remains a concern and costs are increasing.
· Paragraph
51 – Academy Deficits – the meeting expressed concern at the funding earmarked
for academy deficits. Jenny commented
that not all schools in sponsored arrangements have left deficits. Jenny said that following the issuing of a
Notice of Concern, closer working with the financial management of the school
is put in place with the aim of reducing that liability. Jenny commented that the deficit reverts back
to the Local Authority the day before conversion. Sonia Singleton stated that the LA must know
the maintained school was in debt and asked what happened before a notice of
concern was issued. Jenny outlined the
process that takes place which informs them whether the school is in debt.
· Paragraph
55 – The Local Authority Budget – Jenny outlined the key areas for growth and
savings.
Tim thanked Jenny
for her report.
AGREED: That Schools’ Forum approve the retention of budgets to meet the prescribed
statutory duties of the local authority (Paragraph 14, item 3).
AGREED:
That Schools’ Forum approve the centrally retained early years funding
of £1.687M (paragraph 14, Item 4).
AGREED:
That Schools’ Forum note the 2015/16 school
funding rates (Paragraph 20).
AGREED:
That Schools’ Forum note the average per pupil funding to be taken into
account for recoupment for excluded pupils (Paragraph 29).
AGREED:
That Schools’ Forum notes the number and average cost of commissioned
places for children and young people with High Needs.
AGREED:
That Schools’ Forum approve the action to be
taken in respect of schools where the SEN notional budget is insufficient to
meet the aggregated value of High Needs Funding Element 2 (Paragraph 36).
AGREED:
That Schools’ Forum note the retention of the
Dedicated Schools Grant Reserve and the purposes for which it will be used
(Paragraphs 50-53).
AGREED:
That Schools’ Forum note the payment rates for
the Early Years Single Funding formula (Paragraph 49).
Supporting documents: