Minutes:
Jane Moore
introduced the report which sets out the position in respect of high needs
expenditure and actions that are being taken to address increasing costs.
Jane outlined the
priorities for the SEND Strategy priorities 2017 to 2020 which have been agreed
and sit under this strategy. The High
Needs budget was overspent in 2016/17 by £2.5M with placement costs being the
biggest expenditure. For 2017/18 the
budget was increased and the current forecast is £1.5M overspent.
Jane gave
background information on the SEND placement costs and the individual provision
Leicestershire currently provide. A High
Needs Project has now been established to look at budgets within the High Needs
budget in order to identify savings.
Jane said that
there were six workstreams under the project, one of
which is the Specialist Teaching Service.
A review of this service will be launched in mid-March and will offer a
more effective structure. Jane added
that significant work has been carried out on a traded offer and once
restructured a paper will be presented to Forum giving a clearer overview of
the trading offer.
Jane referred to
Children with Medical Needs workstream which is an
area of significant overspend. Jane
added that mental health and anxiety were areas of concern as the local
authority have to rely on private providers to support children who are not
able to be in school. The current budget
position is unsustainable and therefore work will be carried out to review
every case and to look at the longer-term options.
The workstream of SEN Sufficiency and Provision has involved
developing local provision for children with higher functioning needs through Maplewell and Birchwood which has been well received. Secondary resource bases are already in place
in Wigston and Shepshed and
further resource bases have been agreed at Rawlins Academy, Hinckley Academy
and Wigston All Saints Primary. Jane outlined that significant work has been
carried out to develop provision in the area of hearing impaired, conversations
have been started with the behaviour partnerships about developing Emotional
Social Mental Health provision and as part of the early years restructure
additional provision to support children early on is being worked on. For the post-16 area two independent colleges
are working with the local authority on the offering to post-16 students.
Jean Lewis asked
about the definition of post-16 and whether this was up to the age of 19. Jenny commented before SEND reform SEN for
local authorities related to 2-19 but this extended under reform to 0-25.
Jane commented that
there a lot of issues about the transitions and co-working with Adults is
taking place. In addition, Jane said
that she was currently working on a transitions policy. Ros Hopkins
commented that the 19-25 provision needs to be developed if the direction is to
come away from this. There are a
minority of young people with complex needs which cannot be met in the FE
sector. They would need to continue independent high quality provision which is
not a clear alternative.
Jane informed the
meeting that additional capacity will be added to the SEN Service to support
the increased numbers of children coming through the system. The changes include an additional SEN Officer
to work in a person centred way with a view to preparing for adulthood and the
post 16 SENCO to be mainstreamed. The
SEN Service will be reviewed so it is fit for the future.
Callum Orr
expressed his thanks and appreciation to Jane on the areas of development which
will make a massive difference. Jane
added that there was a real commitment to drive this forward and will ensure
communication with schools continues.
Graham Bett echoed
Callum Orr’s comment. Graham referred to
the trading within STS which will require moderating. Jane acknowledged Graham’s comment and said
that moderation will take place as there is huge competition in that area. Part of the STS review would be the core
offer and what can be traded. Jane
referred to a previous paper on STS Traded Service supported by Schools’ Forum
and would like to revisit this again at the next meeting in June. Graham commented that internal trading
between schools and the County Council should be retained.
Karen Allen shared
a concern raised by LPH colleagues that children with ESMH, ASD or an
undiagnosed disorder are not able to get timely support and funding to meet
their needs and as a result complex children exclusions have increased and this
situation will only get worse. Jane
acknowledged the comment and said that part of the development is to increase
resources to support these children.
School’s Forum noted the paper.
Supporting documents: