A
copy of a report to be considered by the Cabinet at its meeting on 14 September
is attached for the consideration of the Commission.
Minutes:
The Commission
considered a report of the Director of Corporate Resources which would be
considered by the Cabinet at its meeting on 14 September and set out the
performance of the Corporate Asset Investment Fund (CAIF) to date, as well as
seeking Cabinet approval to the revised CAIF Strategy for 2018 to 2022 which
set out the Council’s approach to future asset investments utilising the
CAIF. A copy of the report marked
‘Agenda Item 10’ is filed with these minutes.
The Deputy Leader
and Cabinet Leader Member for Resources, Mr J B Rhodes CC, confirmed that he
chaired the CAIF Advisory Board. Its
membership also comprised Mr Rushton CC, Mr Blunt CC, Mr Ould CC and Mr
Shepherd CC. It did not make decisions,
but reviewed proposals and sought views from external advisors. It met in private due to issues around
commercial sensitivity. If it supported
a proposal, this would be reported to the Cabinet for a decision if
appropriate.
The report suggested
that, in order to increase the CAIF, options including incurring additional
prudential borrowing would need to be considered. Mr Rhodes confirmed that this was not
required at present. Over the last seven
years, the County Council had reduced its level of debt by £100 million, but
still had £265 million of debt. He would
be nervous about adding to the level of debt in case it created a problem for
the next generation. However, if there
was confidence that borrowing would produce a greater level of return, it might
be appropriate to do so.
Arising from
discussion, the following points were raised:-
(i)
The overborrowed
position on the capital programme referred to the fact that the Council was
putting money aside to pay off debt, but the long-term nature of debt meant
that it could not currently be paid off.
The money that had been put aside was the money that would be invested.
(ii)
In response to a query about whether the types
of property the Council was investing were flexible enough to respond to
changes in the market, it was confirmed that commercial investments would be
considered on a case by case basis to ensure that the level of risk was
manageable. It was also possible, should the market change, for the Council to
cease developing and either act as landowner or sell the land it had invested
in, depending on which was the best way to ensure the liquidity of the
fund. Advice on changes to the market
was sought from external specialists.
(iii)
Members welcomed the focus in the revised CAIF
on investment in Leicestershire for the benefit of Leicestershire
residents. The proposed use of the fund
to develop new or existing assets to meet Council service needs where this
would reduce operating costs was also welcomed. The Council was currently
considering investing in adult social care facilities as a way of reducing the
cost of care. This would support the
adult social care market and ensure that the right type of facilities, such as
extra care, were available. The business
case was currently being developed and would be submitted to the Cabinet in due
course. In response to this it was
queried whether the County Council, in selling all its residential care homes,
had been short-sighted. However, it was
confirmed that this had generated over £3 million in capital receipt and that
these were old facilities that had required significant investment.
(iv)
It was confirmed that Loughborough University
Science and Enterprise Park (LUSEP) development had arrangements in place to
mitigate risk. For example, it was let on
a full repairing, insuring lease and if the current tenants pulled out the
building could easily be sublet on a floor by floor basis, or even on a
part-floor basis.
RESOLVED:
That the Cabinet be
advised at its meeting on 14 September 2018 of the Scrutiny Commission’s
support for the Corporate Asset Invest Fund Strategy.
Supporting documents: