Minutes:
The Committee
considered a report of the Director of Adults and Communities which provided an
update on Phase One of the Collections and Learning Hub Project, the re-siting
of the Record Office for Leicestershire, Leicester and Rutland (ROLLR) to the County
Hall campus, and, as part of forthcoming stakeholder engagement, presented an
opportunity for the Committee to shape the design brief. A copy of the report
marked ‘Agenda Item 10’ is filed with these minutes.
The Cabinet Lead
Member for Adults and Communities, Mr R Blunt CC, confirmed that he supported
the two-phase approach to the Collections and Learning Hub project. He recognised the need to relocate the
records officer, in order to keep records safe and was comfortable with the
proposal to relocate to County Hall, which was a broadly central location.
Arising from the
discussion, the following comments were raised:
i)
A
Member expressed concern that as the world of digitalisation progresses, hard
copy records may no longer be kept. It was felt important, particularly in
terms of social history, that future generations were still able to access and
refer to local documents.
ii)
In
response to a question, it was confirmed that timescales for starting the build
of the Record Office were indicative at this stage and would be adapted around
the project as it evolved. The visit to the Hereford Record Office, which was
an example of a modern archive, had provided useful insight and information
that had helped shape the process.
iii)
It was
noted that Wigston residents were disappointed that the Records Office was
being relocated. They felt that the
current records offices were well used, with a town centre location and access
to car parking. Concern was also
expressed regarding use of the existing site once the relocation had taken
place. It was confirmed there were currently no plans for the existing site,
but that information would be available at the appropriate time. The Cabinet
Lead Member suggested this could be an opportunity for local members and their
constituents to make suggestions on ways to maximise the use of the old site.
iv)
The
consideration of a Changing Places facility as part of the design brief for the
new records office was welcomed.
v)
It was
confirmed that a project to digitalise existing records was underway,
particularly focused on popular records.
Although the number of people physically searching for documents had
reduced, there had been an increase in people accessing records remotely. As a result, those who came to the records
office were generally more well informed. It was seen as a positive that routes
of access were broadening and changing rather than there being a decline in
service users.
vi)
It was
noted that the requirement for the new records office to have sufficient
storage for the next 25 years was an approximation based on the knowledge of
archivists. There was a risk that, after
25 years, more storage space would be required; however, it was expected that
the increase in digital records would offset this risk.
vii) A member queried why the original proposal
of a Collections and Learning Hub on the same site was no longer being
pursued. It was confirmed that the
project had been scaled back to make it affordable. Phase 2 of the project would see the Creative
Learning Service Collections and the Museum Collections, which were currently
scattered around the county, brought together in the Eastern Annexe. The separate teams had already been brought
together under one management service to maximise opportunities for
collaborative working. It was not
expected that schools would visit the collections hub; rather they bought into
the service so that they could receive artefacts in their schools. The timescale for the development of the
Collections Hub was not known but the Committee would continue to receive
regular programme reports.
RESOLVED:
(a)
That the update on Phase One of the
Collections and Learning Hub Project be noted;
(b)
That members of the Committee be
requested to put forward suggestions for consideration that they or their
constituents may have with regard to maximising the use of the old site once
the relocation has taken place.
Supporting documents: