Minutes:
The Commission
considered a report of the Director of Resources concerning the Revised
Estimates for 2002/03 and the proposed Revenue Budget for 2003/04. A copy of the report marked ‘A’ is filed
with these minutes.
The Commission also
considered a supplementary report of the Chief Executive setting out the
decisions and comments of all the Scrutiny Committees which had met in the
previous week to consider the Revised Estimates for 2002/03 and the proposed
Revenue Budget for 2003/04. A copy of
the supplementary report, marked ‘AA’, is filed with these minutes.
Revenue Budget – Recent Developments
The Committee was
advised:-
(a) of
the representations made to the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister about the adverse
implications of the new funding formula on Leicestershire, particularly in
relation to education;
(b) of
the recent decision of the Department for Education and Skills (DfES)
concerning the treatment of post-16 support grant, the effect of which was to
amend the baseline for calculating the ‘passporting’ figure and reducing the
amount the County Council was obliged to ‘passport’ by a sum of £1.8million;
(c) that
the net surplus on the District Council collection funds which was now
estimated at £1.19 million (an increase of £0.19 million);
(d) that
the final Revenue Support Grant figures would not be known until Monday 3rd
February.
In the light of
these factors, the Leader indicated that Cabinet would need to reconsider the
proposed budget, which it intended to do on 11th February.
In the discussion on the issue of ‘passporting’, a number of members expressed the view, that, whilst acknowledging the pressures elsewhere in the budget and the effects on future budgets, the considerable pressures faced by schools should also be recognised and the amount included in the current budget proposals for the Schools Block should not be significantly altered. An alternative view expressed was that consideration should be given to utilising some, if not all, of the £1.8 million freed up by a lower ‘passporting’ requirement to reduce the level of Council Tax increase,
The Chairman
indicated that at the Leaders’ Meeting held earlier in the day it had been
suggested that the Commission should meet again on Thursday 13th
February 2003 to consider the Cabinet’s final budget proposals.
Revenue Budget proposals
The Leader reported that the Cabinet, in formulating its
budget proposals, had been mindful of the need to balance the requirement to
maintain high quality services for the people of Leicestershire whilst keeping
any increase in Council Tax to an acceptable level. He indicated that the
Cabinet would consider the views
expressed by members during the Scrutiny process.
In the discussion
on other aspects of the Revenue Budget proposals the following
comments/concerns were expressed by members:-
(a) the
absence of any provision for the Common Admission Policy, one of the stated
priorities in the Council’s Medium Term Corporate Strategy, was regretted;
(b) whilst
noting the rationale for the proposed increases in the payments to independent
sector residential care providers, it was considered that all or part of the
increase should have been linked to achievement of some quality
thresholds/targets;
(c) the
absence in the budget of any savings which had been identified in the Highway
Network Review, in particular savings that were to be achieved from the
rationalisation of salting routes and the introduction of thermal mapping;
(d) the
proposed reductions in the Sports Grants and Hedge Laying budgets were
regretted and these should be reconsidered.
(e) the
absence of any growth for implementing the Cultural Strategy. In response, the
Leader indicated that there were a range of cultural activities currently undertaken
by various Departments of the Council. These would contribute to, and fall
within the ambit of the Strategy.
Details of these could be provided to the relevant scrutiny committee if
required;
(f) no
provision had been made for undertaking Health Scrutiny. The Leader and Chief
Executive advised the Commission that detailed guidance was awaited and that
discussions were on going with Leicester City Council and other partners as to
the best way to proceed. Once agreed, support for Health Scrutiny would be
provided in the first instance from within existing resources. That level of
support would be monitored and, if thought necessary, additional resources
would then be sought.
(g) the
cost of the introduction of a job evaluation scheme. The Leader advised that
the need to introduce the scheme in order to address the anomalies of the
previous wage structure and issues of Equal Pay had been recognised by all
three political groups on the Council. He recognised the impact this would have
on the budget.
Scrutiny of the Budget
The Chairman
advised the Commission that it was his view, having observed the proceedings, the
Health and Social Care Scrutiny Committee had not fully considered the
implications of the budget proposals. Mr Rushton, the Chairman of the Health
and Social Care Scrutiny Committee disagreed.
Outstanding Issues
The Director of
Resources undertook to write to Mr Knaggs CC on the issue of delegation targets
and in particular the proposals to delegated the SEN Statementing budget.
RESOLVED:
(a) That the comments made by the Scrutiny
Committees in respect of Revised Estimates for 2003/04 be noted and drawn to
the attention of the Cabinet.
b) That the comments made by the Scrutiny Committees
in respect of the Revenue Budget 2003/04 be noted and drawn to the attention of
the Cabinet.
c) That the views now expressed in
relation to the Revenue Budget 2003/04 be drawn to the attention of the
Cabinet.
d) That the Cabinet be advised that the
Commission proposes to meet again on Thursday 13th January 2003 at
10.30am to consider the Cabinet’s final budget proposals.
Supporting documents: