Minutes:
The Commission
considered a report of the Director of Public Health which provided an update
on work being undertaken with partners to develop a Leicestershire Air Quality
and Health Action Plan, a draft of which was appended to the report. A
copy of the report marked ‘Agenda Item 13’ is filed with these minutes.
The Commission also
received a presentation which set out the effects of air pollution on health and
plans to address poor health outcomes linked to air pollution in the
future. A copy of the slides forming the presentation is filed with these
minutes.
Arising from
discussion, the following points were raised:
(i)
The priorities identified in the Joint Strategic
Needs Assessment agreed by the Health and Wellbeing Board in May 2019 formed
the basis of the actions now set out in the Action Plan. Members
welcomed the Plan and recognised that both nationally and locally air pollution
was the biggest environmental hazard in terms of mortality impacts.
(ii)
Members noted that the County Council had
responsibility to deliver the Action Plan and sought to work with and influence
partners including district councils as the local planning authority, to secure
the outcomes identified within this. However, it was district councils
that had responsibility to monitor and manage air quality and they had to
balance this against the need to deliver increased housing numbers set by
central government. Members raised concerns that no single body had
oversight or control of the issue and that this hindered the ability for real
action to be taken. A member suggested that an explanation of these
conflicting issues and how disjointed the current set up was would be helpful
to enable the public to understand the difficulties local authorities faced in
addressing this issue.
(iii)
Members considered that air quality needed to be
prioritised as part of the local plan process so that mitigation measures could
be identified early. Growth was necessary to boost the local economy and
provide housing. However, this often came at the cost of air quality and
other environmental considerations. Partnership working would be
critical. However, concern was raised that action by consent might no longer
suffice and would not deliver the outcomes required quickly enough.
Members suggested that the Plan could be strengthened in this area. It
was also suggested that the County Council might need to be more direct and
clear about actions required to address air quality and should challenge
district council local plans on this basis.
(iv)
It was noted that unlike on highway matters, the
County Council was not a statutory consultee when it came to air quality.
Whilst it had the ability to undertake modelling and the expertise to provide
advice and support on this issue it was up to individual district councils to
take up that offer. When provided it was also up to district councils
what weight to apply to that data.
(v)
Members agreed that air quality needed to be
brought to the top of the agenda and district councils and developers brought
on board. However, it was recognised that without support from central
government, it would be difficult for local planning authorities to give this
the weight needed when deciding planning applications. Refusal of an
application based on the adverse air quality impacts a development may have
would likely be overturned on appeal based on current planning legislation.
(vi)
Members felt more monitoring needed to be
undertaken to give a true picture of the extent to which air quality was a
problem across the County and to identify those key areas requiring
action. Improved data would also support future decisions around where
developments could and could not take place as part of the local plan process,
or if planning applications were to be refused on the grounds of air quality
impacts. Members commented, however, that district councils did not have
sufficient resources to do this and would require further support to take this forward.
(vii)
Members welcomed work by the Strategic Planning
Group to produce a health planning guide and hoped that this would help
developers understand what was expected in respect of air quality measures as
part of a development. However, it was not clear how this would address
existing problems arising from existing or current developments.
(viii)
It was suggested that the data now presented for
each district should be shared and publicised to drive the need for
change.
(ix)
Concern was expressed that there was currently
no member involvement in the development of the Plan or its delivery. The
Director agreed and undertook to revisit the governance structure to ensure
political oversight was properly reflected in the Plan.
(x)
A member suggested that it would be helpful to
understand what work was being done in surrounding areas including the City
Council, which would likely impact the air quality position in some boundary
areas, particularly those like Oadby and Wigston which had much higher levels
of pollution that other parts of the County.
RESOLVED:
That the comments
now made be submitted to the Cabinet for consideration.
Supporting documents: