Minutes:
The Chief Executive reported that three questions had been received under Standing Order 7.
1.
Question by Dr Terri Eynon CC:
I would like to ask
about the closure of the hydrotherapy
pool at LGH:
(a)
How
many patients currently access the hydrotherapy pool at LGH?
Reply by Chairman:
118 patients per
week, both children and adults
(b) How is the hydrotherapy pool
at LGH currently staffed?
Reply by Chairman:
Sessions are
provided by UHL Physio Therapists and also used by LPT
Therapy teams and external groups who staff independently with a lifeguard
(c)
How many patients do the CCG envisage accessing hydrotherapy under the new arrangements?
This number is yet
to be determined as the changes will not be implemented for a further 5 years, and would depend on where the pools are located.
(d) How will the new hydrotherapy sessions be staffed?
Reply by Chairman:
Please see my
answer to question b above.
(e) Have the CCG already
identified sites in the community?
Reply by the Chairman:
A mapping exercise
identified 5 possible pools in Loughborough, Glenfield, Oakham and Stamford. The
CCG is working with the One Public Estate Leisure Group to expand this offer over
the next 5 years, with possible areas including Wigston and Harborough. The feedback from the consultation will also
be used to understand impact on people and may also identify other options for
us to consider
(f) Where are these pools likely to be?
Reply by Chairman:
Please see the
answer to question (e) above.
(g) How
can the CCG ensure these community pools are suitable for use as hydrotherapy pools? Will they be warm
enough? Will they have hoists?
Reply by Chairman:
There is clear
guidance that must be complied with.
This includes:
·
Temperature
– The pool should be heated between 32.3c – 36.0c;
·
Depth -
approximately 1.0 – 1.2m at its deepest with steps down to each depth; not a
sloping floor.
·
The
pool must also have access to a hoist.
(h) How
much investment will this require?
Reply by Chairman:
The expectation is
that the pools will he hired for sessions, so no capital investment will be
required. There will be a cost to the services for those who want to use them and this will be calculated at the appropriate time in
the future.
(i) How
will hydrotherapy treatment integrate with community provision
after patients are discharged
from hydrotherapy?
Reply by Chairman:
This is yet to be
determined as part of a wider review of community based
therapies. As now patients are signposted to local hydrotherapy/self-help
groups and other forms of exercise e.g. exercise referral schemes.
(j) How will this change lead to
better outcomes for patients?
Reply by Chairman:
It should reduce
travel time for patients, as they should be able to access pools closer to
home. The evidence from the cardiac physio therapy pilot that provided patients
with physio at Aylestone Leisure Centre rather than
in the hospital setting, showed that the outcomes were improved because the
patient continued to access the services at the leisure centre after they were
discharged by the physio team, giving long-term health benefits. Therefore the planning for the hydrotherapy service will
consider this model and possible wider health benefits.
2.
Question by Cllr Sam Harvey
Please confirm the
following for the year 2019/2020:
(a)
The number of Rutland residents who delivered
at St Mary’s Unit;
Reply by Chairman
14
(b) The
number of Rutland residents who received post partum
inpatient care in the ward at St Mary’s;
Reply by Chairman:
No Rutland
residents received post-partum inpatient care in the ward in St. Mary’s.
(c) The
number of Rutland Residents who delivered at either LGH or LRI;
Reply by Chairman
Leicester General Hospital |
42 |
Leicester Royal Infirmary |
37 |
(d) The number of Rutland residents who received post
partum/ post natal care in Rutland, who delivered
out of county, i.e. Peterborough, Kettering etc.
Reply by Chairman:
The Clinical
Commissioning Groups have undertaken to provide an answer to this question by
23 December 2020 and I will make sure you receive it.
3.
Question by Cllr Sam Harvey
The Clinical
Commissioning Group has stated that Rutlanders formed
eleven percent of respondees to the Building Better
Hospitals consultation. Can you confirm the following:
(a) The total
number of respondees to date;
(b) The number per
unitary authority;
(c) A breakdown of respondees by age, as per the demographic question on the
consultation.
Reply by the Chairman:
I have put your
questions to the Clinical Commissioning Groups and they have provided the
following response:
“All the
consultation responses received from the consultation will be independently
analysed and evaluated by Midlands and Lancashire Commissioning Support Unit
(CSU).
The responses
provided by the public are anonymous.
However, the questionnaire does ask people to provide socio-demographic
and equality data. This is
optional. Where people have provided
this information, the CSU will include a full breakdown of this data in their
Consultation Report. The final Consultation Report of Findings will be received
by the three CCG governing bodies and discussed in a public meeting in the
first half of 2021. The public
consultation feedback will be considered and taken into
account in any decisions they make.
The papers for this
meeting will be publicly available including the Consultation Report of
Findings. We will promote the governing
body meetings to enable people to attend and hear the discussions. All
decisions will be made public after the governing board meetings and further
engagement work will commence with people who use services provided by UHL.
This work will include communicating the decision via local newspapers, social
and broadcast media. We would also expect to present this information to the
Scrutiny Committee.”
Supporting documents: