Minutes:
The Committee considered a report of the Director of
Corporate Resources, the purpose of which was to present the Annual Audit
Letter 2019/20 for approval. A copy of the report marked ‘Agenda Item 10’, is
filed with these minutes.
The Chairman welcomed Mr John Gregory from Grant Thornton UK
LLP, the County Council’s external auditors for 2019/20, to the meeting.
Mr Gregory confirmed that an unqualified opinion had been
issued on the Authority’s accounts for the year ending March 2020 and the value
for money conclusion issued for that period was also unqualified. He stated
that as previously reported to the Committee the Emphasis of Matter (EoM) that had been included in Grant Thornton’s audit
opinion regarding the valuation of land and buildings, was simply an additional
paragraph to draw the reader’s attention to a particular part of the accounts,
in this case to acknowledge disclosures of material uncertainty that had been
made in the Bruton Knowles’ valuation report as at 31 March 2020 as a result of
the Covid-19 pandemic.
Mr Gregory also confirmed that with regard to the Whole of
Government Accounts the work referred to in the Annual Audit Letter to complete
the work on the Council’s consolidation return following guidance issued by the
National Audit Office was now complete, there were no outstanding issues to report
on this matter and an assurance statement would be issued to this effect.
Arising from discussion and questions the following points
were raised:
(i)
In response to concerns raised regarding the
disparity between the planned fees for the period and the actual fees charged
to the Council for the year ending March 2020, Mr Gregory advised the
following:
•
The areas of additional work unrelated to the
Covid-19 pandemic had been foreseen, negotiated with the relevant Council officers and factored into the relevant Audit Plan to
communicate that fee increases were expected. The increases had also been
discussed with the Public Sector Audit Appointments Ltd. (PSAA) (the sector led
body for external auditor appointments) around the same time and subsequently
approved. These fee increases reflected the pressures Grant Thornton was facing
to make the changes imposed by regulators to national auditing standards such
as around pension liabilities and Property, Plant and Equipment (PPE). For
example, there was now an expectation for auditing companies to employ its own
or obtain advice from valuation experts to help support the work around the
valuation of PPE.
•
The effects of the Covid-19 pandemic had caused
the costs to Grant Thornton to deliver audits for the year ending March 2020 to
increase significantly by around 40-50%. Rather than recovering all of the
costs from its clients, Grant Thornton had absorbed much of the costs itself
and asked its clients to pay a proportion of the total amount. The additional
fees were necessary due to the additional work that the pandemic had created,
particularly as due to the Covid-19 restrictions much of the usual informal
contact had not been possible and work ordinarily carried out face to face had
had to be conducted remotely which could often be a longer process and had
caused delays in auditing processes. There had also been specific technical
accounting issues to resolve. Members were further advised that these issues
were also not isolated to Grant Thornton in that other companies had also
experienced similar issues.
•
As to whether Grant Thornton was able to offset
some of the additional costs relating the Covid-19 pandemic against a perceived
reduction in chargeable travel time to appointments, Mr Gregory explained that
whilst staff travelling to attend meetings such as at County Hall may have been
chargeable the majority of travel that Grant Thornton’s audit team undertook
prior to the pandemic to carry out audits would have usually formed part of
their daily commute and would therefore not be chargeable to clients.
(ii)
In response to a query raised by a member, it
was confirmed that the valuation of pensions was an area also considered by the
Local Pension Board and Committee. Mr Gregory added that each year auditors
were required to consider their report against other areas of reporting to
ensure consistency.
RESOLVED:
That the Annual Audit Letter for 2019-20 be approved and distributed to all Members of the Council.
Supporting documents: