Minutes:
The Committee
considered a report of the Director of Children and Family Services which provided
an update on planned activity and progress made around SEND and Inclusion, as
well as outlining current financial challenges, demand in the SEND system and
an overview of the new Transforming SEND and Inclusion in Leicestershire (TSIL)
programme. A copy of the report marked ‘Agenda Item 8’ is filed with these
minutes.
In introducing the
report, the Director outlined the current financial challenges being faced
within SEND and inclusion, in particular the
anticipated cumulative deficit of £63m. The Department had been experiencing
increased growth and demand, as well as service delays, a high number of
complaints and increased appeals against decisions.
Arising from discussion, the following points were made:
i.
In response to concerns raised around the 54%
increase in the number of children and young people requiring an Education,
Health and Care Plan (EHCP) in Leicestershire, when compared to the East
Midlands (32%) and England (38%), the Director explained that the TSIL
programme would aim to understand the reason behind the difference and would
develop a strategy to address the issue. Diagnostic work had been undertaken in
late 2021 to understand the challenges and difficulties in the local SEND
system and to inform planning for the TSIL programme. The TSIL programme would
aim to identify the barriers for providing support to children requiring an
EHCP and would develop a strategy for working with mainstream schools to ensure
that children could receive, where appropriate, support in a mainstream school
setting. Members requested and the Director undertook to provide detailed
updates on progress of delivery of the TSIL programme, including updates on the
number of Leicestershire children and young people requiring an EHCP compared
to regional and national data.
ii.
A member raised concerns regarding the increase
in the number of parents going to appeal or a tribunal which had compounded the
delays in the Special Educational Needs Assessment (SENA) service. The member questioned what could be done to avoid
this in the future. The Director
confirmed that the appeal process was difficult for all involved and the
ambition of the service would be to provide the right support at the right time
in the right place which should help avoid disagreements in the system around a
child’s care. Members were assured that the Department would continue to
conduct learn from current cases which would help identify better ways of
working for the future though the TSIL programme. However, it was accepted that there would still
be some cases where referral to appeal or a tribunal could not be avoided.
iii.
Members noted that a small number of school
places for children transferring to junior and secondary school being assessed
for an EHCP had not yet been awarded. However, these were complex cases which
involved challenging circumstances which the Department was working to resolve
as quickly as possible. Members were reassured that service planning had been
undertaken within the Department and with transport colleagues to create
milestones which would aim to deal with delays proactively rather than
reactively. The Director undertook to provide members with information on the
current number of assessments outstanding for children transitioning to junior
or secondary school.
iv.
It was noted that greater focus would be placed
on identifying and meeting a child’s needs. The Director highlighted the need
to recognise that a child’s needs could still be met where issues were
identified through other services and tat an EHCP was not always needed or
appropriate. Members commented that communication with parents as part of this
process would be critical.
v.
A member commented that it would be important to
keep parents informed of pressures in the system. If they did not understand
then it was more likely that complaints would be received. The Director
confirmed that relationship and information management had been identified as
key work streams for the Council’s planned future approach within the TSIL
programme. Closer working with the Parent and Carer Forum would aim to improve
relationship management through closer engagement with parents and carers.
Closer engagement with parents would continue to inform improvements to
internal systems such as Synergy and aim to improve knowledge around working
with blended families. It would also help manage parental expectations
throughout the process.
vi.
A member commented that whilst the approach to
seek the views of children should be welcomed, there were some with
disabilities that meant they could not easily communicate. Excellent work was,
however, being undertaken in many special schools and it was suggested that
ensuring their involvement to help capture the views of the children they
supported would benefit the programme for the future.
vii.
Members noted that expansions had taken place at
all five Local Area Special Schools to provide an additional 94 places from
September 2022 as part of the Departments wider SEND strategy for developing
local provision and to meet the demand for a specific cohort of children
requiring places. The TSIL programme would continue to develop on this work to
meet the demand for school places and to ensure that children were placed in
the correct setting to meet their individual needs.
viii.
In response to concern around the cost of
increasing deficits in the Dedicated Schools Grant budget, the Director
explained that the Government had conducted a data collection exercise to
analyse how local authorities managed this budget. Members noted that the
deficit remained unfunded and that there was therefore a budget overspend.
However, the Department for Education (DfE) would not issue any penalty from
running this deficit. The Director reported that changes to accounting
regulations were expected from 2023 which would be informed by the Government
data collection exercise. Members noted that the Council fell within a group of
55 local authorities which had ‘less severe but substantial deficits’ and so
had been invited to join the national government Delivering Better Value in
SEND Programme. Initial discussions with the DfE about the programme had taken
place but the nature of the programme and the level of support from the DfE
remained unclear.
ix.
The Cabinet Lead Member for Children and
Families added that the funding position of the Council and for Leicestershire
schools had contributed to delays within SEND and Inclusion services and
continued to affect provision of SEND and Inclusion support in schools.
RESOLVED:
a)
That the update on planned activity and progress
being made around SEND and Inclusion alongside ongoing financial challenges and
increased demand in the SEND system be noted.
b)
That the Director of Children and Family
Services be requested to provide Members of the Committee with a further update
on the number of outstanding assessments for EHC Plans for those children who
had transitioned to junior or secondary school in September 2022.
c)
That it be noted that further updates would be
presented to future meetings of the Children and Families Overview and Scrutiny
Committee as appropriate on progress on the delivery of the Transforming SEND
and Inclusion in Leicestershire programme.
Supporting documents: