Minutes:
The following
questions received under Standing Order 35, were put to the Chairman of the
Highways and Transport Overview and Scrutiny Committee:
a) Question
asked by Rachael Wigginton
“With a record number
of residents responding to Leicestershire’s cycling and walking strategy and
plan engagement, it’s very pleasing to see a greater focus on active travel
filtering through into publications like the Highway Design Guide. It’s also
very pleasing to see collaboration and engagement as principle number one. Most
journeys are very short and people of all ages are
discovering it’s very often quicker and easier to travel by (e)bike or
(e)scooter, so putting active travel at the heart of local transport strategy
makes perfect sense.
As active travel
now sits very firmly at the heart of the government’s health, transport and net zero agendas, with longer term
opportunities for funding and support now available, and with active travel
featuring heavily in the vast majority of our county, district, borough and
town strategies and plans,
Could the Chair please state:
Which
Leicestershire county
councillor is championing and leading the change (not just responsible)
for Active Travel – working across all the relevant portfolio areas in the
council like health, net zero etc? This person and their level of ambition and
appetite for change is incredibly important to secure future funding, as we are
seeing in other counties.”
Response by the Chairman
Both the Leader of the County Council and the Lead Member for
Highways and Transport are fully supportive of active travel; for example, they
have worked to ensure that the Authority continues to be able to fund the
development of Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plans (LCWIPS), which
are vital to have in place in order for the Authority to secure funding from
the Government to deliver projects that fulfil the ambitions of our cycling and
walking strategy. In that context, the Authority does not consider it is necessary
at this time to have a specific active travel
champion.
Supplementary
Question asked by Rachael Wigginton
“In response to
your answer, the lack of someone driving the active travel agenda at a
strategic level and taking a holistic approach across all the different local
authority areas including planning, health, net zero, air quality, high street
regeneration and so on is impacting on our ability to succeed in encouraging
more people to walk, wheel and cycle.
In Leicestershire the vast majority of residents live in urban areas. All our
towns can easily be cycled from one side to the other in under 20 minutes, less
on an eBike. However, people have got into the habit
of using a car for incredibly short journeys and children’s independent travel is
limited as there is no safe alternative for them.
Active Travel
England is a newly formed body set up as part of the Department for Transport
and has responsibility for awarding active travel funding. It aims to
support willing and ambitious local authorities.
Therefore the approach, desire and ambition of the
county council is critically important in getting hold of that funding and
greater support from Active Travel England. Could you please reconsider the
approach as we are in danger of missing out on funding and support?”
Response by the Chairman
At the invitation of the Chairman, the Assistant Director,
Development and Growth Highways and Transport responded that the Department
would provide a response in writing to the supplementary question.
Post meeting the following response was
provided:
We are actively engaged with Active Travel England (ATE). We have
recently secured from them £190,000 to supplement the County Council’s own
monies that it has committed to the development of schemes to improve walking
and cycling facilities (despite the challenging financial circumstance it and
other local authorities are experiencing). We are also continuing to build our
capabilities to develop schemes in accordance with cycle Design Guide LTN1/20.
From our ongoing discussions with ATE we are confident that the actions we are
taking will, by later this year, place us in a position to ‘bid’ to it for
capital funding to commence the delivery of schemes under the four Local
Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plans that we are developing.
Those LCWIPS are focusing predominantly on urban areas of
Leicestershire, places where there are likely to be the greatest opportunities
for people to leave their cars at home and instead feel confident and safe to
walk and cycle. However, many of our towns have historic routes and are
constrained in their street layouts, bringing challenges to the delivery of
suitable standard walking and cycling infrastructure, whilst also needing to
maintain safe vehicular access, e.g. for taxis, buses,
deliveries and for those who, for whatever reason, must use a car to get
around. It’s also important to remember that many residents of Leicestershire
live in more ‘rural’ areas. Thus, we are actively encouraging ATE to produce
‘Market Town’ and ‘Rural Areas’ guidance to help inform the future development
of schemes in such areas.
b) Question
asked by Rachael Wigginton
“When are you
planning to start a partnership approach and involve local community groups
like ours (as Worcestershire is now doing following its Zero active travel
assessment rating from Active Travel England and the Department of Transport)?
You have a number of residents from within several
districts/boroughs with a broad range of skills and experience, who are willing
help you on a voluntary basis. Experience ranges from working with Sustrans, Active Travel England and within the fields of
civil engineering, communications and tourism.”
Response by the
Chairman
The Council recognises the importance of community involvement
in the development of future plans and schemes for cycling and walking, and
that is part of the reason why it has consulted extensively in the development
of the South Leicestershire Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plan
(LCWIP), including with Ms Wiggington on behalf of
Better Biking For Blaby District. Going forward, the
Authority will be establishing an Active Travel Forum for Leicestershire, and
officers will be in contact with Ms Wigginton and representatives of other
relevant bodies in making arrangements to establish that
Forum. Additionally, as and when the Council is in a
position to develop specific local schemes, further consultation exercises with
local residents and relevant bodies will be carried out to inform their
development.”
Supplementary
Question asked by Rachael Wigginton
“‘Consulted with’
is not the same as ‘working in partnership with’. The relationship you have
with me and our community group is no different from consulting
with any other resident as part of the engagement process for LCWIPs. Being a
trusted partner is a completely different thing. This hands
off approach is also hampering efforts to encourage more people to
travel actively. In that regard, could you tell me which month the first
meeting of the Active Travel Forum will be?”
Response by the Chairman
At the invitation of the Chairman, the Assistant Director,
Development and Growth Highways and Transport responded that the Department
would provide a response in writing to the supplementary question.
Post meeting the following response was
provided:
As a general principle, we seek to undertake consultation exercises openly
and fairly, such that all parties with an opinion to offer can be heard and
their views considered appropriately. In some cases
bodies, such as ‘Better Biking for Blaby District’, may have a more particular
and informed insight to offer, which is why in this case we are establishing an
Active Travel Forum in order for such bodies to be able to come together to do
so.
We are still determining the best date to launch the forum, however
prior to the launch of the forum we would like to offer you, as the chair of
‘Better Biking for Blaby District’ advocacy group and Cycling UK
representative, the opportunity to meet with the Lead Member for Highways
Transportation and Flooding, along with senior officers to discuss how bodies
like ‘Better Bike for Blaby District’ might best be involved in the forum, as a
basis for ongoing productive partnership working to encourage and enable our
communities to travel actively. Should this be agreeable to you, an officer
will be in contact shortly to arrange a mutually agreeable time for the meeting
subject to everyone’s dairies.
Supporting documents: