Minutes:
Mr C. Smith CC, Chairman of the Scrutiny
Review Panel, introduced the report. He reminded the Commission that the
Panel had been established at its request following its consideration of the Medium Term Financial Strategy 2023/24 – 2026/27 in January
2023 which included the proposal to cease delivery of both SHIRE Grant
programmes with immediate effect. Members noted that the aim of the
review was to determine the impact and value for money achieved through both
Grant programmes and to consider the likely effects of discontinuation.
In presenting the report the Chairman
welcomed and thanked external witnesses that had contributed to the review.
Arising from discussion, the following
points were made:
(i)
Whilst it was acknowledged that it was not unusual for organisations to
seek repeat funding, the majority of the Panel had
been concerned at the level of such applications, particularly as such
organisations had no metrics to show the benefits and outcomes achieved with
the grant provided which was sometimes substantial.
(ii) The
Council had a significant funding gap of over £80m that needed to be addressed
and so it had to be recognised that its resources needed to be prioritised
towards its core statutory duties such as child and adult social care.
(iii)
The situation was regrettable and a reflection of the current financial
position of the Council which continued to be the lowest funded local authority
in the country.
(iv) A
Member commented that the programmes had grown significantly over the years and
were being provided to organisations that were not intended to be the original
recipients of such financial support. The Grants had been established to
support small community groups and not to support organisations that already
had other funding streams, were large enough to employ staff, or those able to
raise money by way of a precept. Such organisations had rightly applied
in line with the Council’s criteria, but this could no longer be sustained.
(v)
All Members recognised that the organisations that sought either grant
funding were undertaking valuable work and providing excellent support to
communities and that the Panel’s recommendations were regrettable.
However, the majority commented that difficult financial decisions were
necessary at the current time, though it was hoped this could be reviewed again
at some future date.
(vi) Members
noted that there were other grant schemes available from organisations with
significantly more funding, such as Lloyds Bank and the National Lottery Fund
and welcomed plans to ensure officers were able to continue to provide advice, support and signpost to where such funding was still
available.
(vii) A
Member expressed disappointment that a reduced grant programme could not be
provided for and that the Panel’s proposals would mean the Council went from a
position of providing a broad Grants programme to providing nothing within a
year.
(viii) A
Member further commented that the Grant Programmes had been expanded during the
pandemic and suggested that rather than abolishing the programmes entirely,
more could perhaps be done to return the scheme to pre-covid levels or for
tighter rules to be imposed to prevent repeat applications.
(ix) Another
Member commented that to remove the grants entirely would inevitably impact
communities as many of the organisations receiving funding provided services
and support where the Council was already unable to do so due to limited
resources. Some Members commented that a recommendation for smaller grant
fund programmes that were more targeted so as to
address the concerns raised by the Panel had been hoped for.
(x)
In response to the concerns raised, the Chairman of the Review Panel
commented that by ensuring the Grant Programmes continued for a further year,
though on a more targeted basis, this would ensure organisations would have
time to seek advice and source alternative funding streams and that Council
officers would be on hand to support them in that process. The Chairman
further commented that no one wished to see the Grant Programmes brought to an end, but on balance, in the face of current
financial pressures, this was considered the best approach. If
circumstances improved, then it was hoped the matter could be revisited.
That
the report of the Scrutiny Review Panel on SHIRE Community and SHIRE
Environment Grants be recommended for consideration by the Cabinet at its
meeting on 23 June 2023 for consideration.
(The Resolution was put and carried, 8
members voting in favour, 3 members voting against.)
Supporting documents: