Minutes:
Arising from
discussion, the following points arose:
(i)
Whilst all traded services had recovered well
over the last 12 months, wage inflation and rising energy costs had
unfortunately eroded these improvements and so overall contribution was still
down compared to target.
(ii)
Members were particularly interested in the
performance of Beaumanor Hall. Whilst it had performed well, the changes
having been made to address the deficits in previous years arising from Covid
now coming to fruition, its financial performance had been affected by
increased energy costs given the age and size of the building, and other inflationary
pressures.
(iii)
The school meals service had continued to face
significant challenges, but these were also being experienced by other similar
organisations providing such services and so the Council’s position was not
unusual.
(iv)
Whilst it was clear that every effort was being
made by officers in the face of some very significant and unexpected
challenges, a Member commented that a very significant
increase in turnover would be needed to address the gap in contribution versus
the MTFS figure. A Member further
highlighted that before Covid, the Council’s traded services were making a
profit and contributing to the Council’s budget, avoiding the need for more
cuts. Further consideration of the
planned approach to return to such a position would be beneficial.
(v)
In response to concerns raised, Members were
reassured that in considering the profitability and future improvement of each
traded service, all aspects of the business were considered as well as
different types of operating models, including outsourcing. In respect of country park cafes, for
example, the cost of car parking was considered to ensure this was not
prohibitive. In respect of Beaumanor Hall, external advisors had been engaged to
provide advice on future improvements to both its external activities and
wedding services.
(vi)
A Member commented that as the Council was
facing some stark decisions regarding its future spending it would be necessary
to shine a spotlight on all services provided, particularly those that were
discretionary, like traded services.
(vii)
Members requested that a Scrutiny Commission
workshop be held to discuss in more depth the service action plans
and the costs and income generated by all traded services noting the need to
manage some commercially sensitive information.
A Member further suggested that after the workshop, in approximately six
months’ time, a further performance update report be presented to a future
Scrutiny Commission meeting.
(viii)
Efforts had been made to encourage schools that
had missed out on residential activities at Beaumanor
Hall as a result of Covid-19, to now take these up,
this being beneficial for the business but in particular the children that were
otherwise missing out. However,
increased transport costs were challenging for some schools. In any event, the service was actively
working with head teachers to try and expand and adapt the offer to encourage
more visits in future.
(ix)
It was suggested that the proposed workshop
would be helpful to demonstrate the journey the Council had been on over the
last year and following the pandemic, as well as providing an opportunity to
share the input of external advisors on how to make services like Beaumanor Hall more effective for the future.
(x)
It was recognised that some organisations which
the Council traded with were also going through difficult times. For example, school budgets were also being
squeezed which was affecting both the school meals service and Beaumanor Hall. It
was anticipated that the school meals business would be smaller going forward
as schools and multi-academy trusts sought to retender their catering
operations. As the ethos of the
Council’s school meal service is to offer food which
is both affordable, but also healthy and locally sourced, where possible, a
fall in customers was expected if schools valued cheap provision ahead of a
quality offer. A degree of flexibility had been built into the service to
respond as necessary.
(xi)
A Member commented that, in terms of country
parks and cafes etc. it was not entirely clear what assets the Council owned
and from which it operated a traded service/generated an income and suggested
that more clarity could be provided on this within future reports.
(xii)
The previous Strategy had set both the strategic
direction for the service and included an overall action plan of outcomes to be
achieved. Such a centralised,
prescriptive approach was no longer considered appropriate given the varied
nature of the Council’s traded services.
The new Strategy had been revised to set the overall strategic principles
which would guide the Council’s approach to traded activity in the future. Action Plans would then be produced and
included within service plans, ensuring alignment to the Council’s Medium Term
Financial Strategy. A Member commented
that sight of those service plans would enable more detailed scrutiny to be
undertaken on how well each traded service was recovering and the Director
undertook to share details with Members outside the meeting.
RESOLVED:
(a) That
the performance update on Leicestershire Traded Services (LTS) during 2022/23
and the revised Traded Services Strategy (previously titled the Commercial
Strategy) for 2023-28 be noted;
(b) That
the comments now made by the Scrutiny Commission be presented to the Cabinet at
its meeting on 23 June 2023 for consideration.
(c) That
a Scrutiny Commission workshop be held to consider in more depth the Council’s
traded services, related action plans and the costs (including capital costs)
and income being generated.
(d) That
following the workshop referred to in (c) above, a further report be presented
to the Scrutiny Commission in six months’ time providing a further update on
performance.
Supporting documents: