Minutes:
The Committee
considered a report of the Director of Corporate Resources which provided
information on the Leicestershire Pension Fund (Fund) direct property
investments and the performance of the UK direct property fund and market
outlook. A copy of the report marked ‘Agenda Item 6’ is filed with these
minutes.
The Chairman
welcomed to the meeting Mr Sam Brice and Ms. Andrea White from DTZ
International (DTZ) who supplemented the report with a presentation which is
also filed with these minutes.
Arising from the
report and presentation the following points arose:
i.
It was
noted that whilst the Fund had allocated money to DTZ, no purchases had been
made to date due to limited available investment products. However, DTZ stated
it had upcoming opportunities and had taken the approach to contact other
landlords directly to see if they were looking to down weight their real estate
exposure.
ii.
A
Member asked if there was a danger that asset values would be inflated with
more money chasing fewer opportunities, and if so, how it affected investment
returns. DTZ explained that, although there were less products, there were also
fewer buyers, mainly due to higher inflation and consequential impacts on the
economy over the past 12 months. Some investors were waiting for the economy to
stabilise before investing. However, DTZ explained that during Quarter 4, the
market had gone through a period of repricing, which had made the market more
attractive to investors, with resilient sector (Industrial and Retail) prices
having held steady with no significant increases. It was further anticipated
that there would be some capital appreciation over the next four years in those
sectors.
iii.
A
Member questioned if additional costs to reach net zero in the property market
by 2040 had been taken into account when acquiring
property. DTZ confirmed that reaching Net Zero was a key focus both in terms of
acquisitions and also with assets already held within
the wider business. Members noted that DTZ had undertaken Net Zero audits
across the portfolio to identify what costs would be incurred to transition an
asset to Net Zero. It was further noted that there were Asset Improvement Plans
which incorporated a range of different aspects, including ESG (Environmental,
Social and Governance) and Net Zero to ensure DTZ were taking appropriate
actions. DTZ confirmed it also had robust processes to ensure correct pricing
when acquiring assets, and that assets were reviewed on an annual basis to
forecast returns.
iv.
Members
were informed that the biggest area affected in terms of change in its
structure was the office market. Forecast charts did reflect a fall in the
value of the market, reflecting a lower tenant base, and increased costs in
building improvements to meet modern ESG standards. Tenants would also go
through various phases of different business models, and the key would be to
focus on assets that were flexible enough to meet a tenant’s changing
occupational requirements.
v.
A
Member referred to the funds allocated but not yet committed in the sector and,
with falling capital values, questioned the correct timing of the purchase of
assets in the current market. DTZ acknowledged it was always very difficult to
time the market. They were positive with the resilient sectors but were
cautious to price assets on their own merits, looking long-term over the
five-year period to deliver returns.
RESOLVED:
That the report and
presentation from DTZ International on Leicestershire Pension Fund direct
property investments and the performance of the UK direct property funding and
market outlook be noted.
(Mr Sam Brice
and Ms. Andrea White left the meeting at this point).
Supporting documents: