Minutes:
The Chairman reported that four questions had been received under Standing Order 7.
1.
Question by Mr. Phil King CC:
Hospital Parking and Blue Badge Holders
Over the past year or so, for a variety of reasons I have had to visit
all three main hospital sites in Leicester with a family member who is a blue
badge holder.
There appears to be a disparity regarding the treatment of Blue Badge
parking.
Glenfield- free
General- free
But at the LRI site, there are signs up everywhere stating that Blue
Badge parking has to be paid for.
However, some weeks ago, by chance I overheard another visitor to the
LRI site being informed that Blue Badge parking was now free, contrary to the
public signage, so long as you get your badge validated at the parking office.
Upon querying this at the parking office, I was told that yes the policy
had been changed by the government and blue badge parking now was free at the
LRI hospital car-parks.
When I was last at the site in late November, there was still no amended
signage, no information in any patient communication, and numerous blue-badge
holders paying in error at the parking payment machines.
But there is a new webpage with the correct information.
I would like UHL NHS Trust to confirm:-
·
When did these new
arrangements start from?
·
When are you going to
start publicising this change?
·
When will all the
signage and machines be correctly updated by?
·
When will the
pre-appointment information sent to patients be changed?
·
And for those who have
paid charges during this ‘free’ period, does UHL have any plans to re-imburse
those who have made such payments?
Reply by the Chairman:
I have sought a response from UHL to the issues raised in the question
and they have provided the following statement:
“UHL recognises the importance
of appropriate accessible parking to the many patients, staff and visitors that
have access needs. Parking is therefore
free of charge for patients, staff and visitors with a blue badge at all our
sites. Different technologies are used, such as pay and display or
ANPR parking at different sites, and this requires a different approach at each
site. At the LRI, blue badge holders are asked to either take their badge
to the car park office or to buzz the exit terminal when leaving the car
park.
A recent review has found no
signage instructing blue badge holders to pay for parking. However, we
recognise that more can be done - on site, on our digital channels, and via
patient letters to improve awareness of free parking to eligible groups,
including people with accessibility needs, and to ensure compliance so the facilities
are not abused.
We have no plans to reimburse
those who have paid charges since the changes were rolled out in December
2021.”
Supplementary question from Mr King CC
Mr King CC stated that he did not feel the answer sufficiently addressed
his original question and raised concerns that the changes to blue badge
parking had not been well enough communicated to the public. Mr King CC asked
for a timescale of when further communication with the public would be carried
out.
Reply from the Chairman
The Chairman asked Jon Melbourne, Chief Operating Officer - University
Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (UHL), who was present at the meeting, whether
he could provide any further information regarding the question. Jon Melbourne
confirmed that parking was free for all blue badge visitors to UHL and promised
that after the meeting he would provide a timescale of when further
communications to the public would take place.
2.
Question by Mr. Phil King CC:
Leicester General Hospital and the Hydrotherapy Pool
During the pandemic in 2020 the Hydrotherapy Pool at LGH was closed as a
consequence of the Covid19 regulations and has remained closed ever since.
Earlier this year, in response to my question on the 18th
January, 2023:-
UHL stated that
A repair was required which would cost £153000, plus VAT, but that this
… is subject to availability of
capital funding in 2023/24. A detailed proposal for capital expenditure in
2023/24 financial year will be brought to the Trust Board in the Spring of 2023
for review and approval, and the hydrotherapy pool will be considered in this
process
To the best of my knowledge this has not happened.
Can UHL now confirm what their plan is for this pool facility?
When is it going to be repaired, and most importantly reopened for the
patients of LLR?
Reply by the Chairman:
UHL have provided me with the
following information in response to the question:
“A proposal was submitted
during the 2023/4 planning round to fund the approximately £500,000 identified
by a feasibility study to meet the costs of repairing the hydrotherapy pool and
bringing it up to current standards.
Funds for capital expenditure
are very limited and other projects identified as having greater clinical risk
were identified and prioritised. The proposal will be re-considered in the
2024/25 planning round.
In the meantime, we are committed to support patients to find
alternative community-based provision, where practical.”
Supplementary question from Mr King CC
Mr. King CC asked for confirmation of whether the matter was going to be
resolved and if so, when.
Reply from the Chairman
The Chairman asked Jon Melbourne, Chief Operating Officer - University
Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (UHL), whether he could provide any further
information regarding the question. Jon Melbourne confirmed that the proposals
for the hydrotherapy pool would be re-considered in the 2024/25 planning round
but stated that he could not guarantee that the proposals would be approved for
capital funding. He offered reassurance that patients were receiving
alternative evidence based provision in the meantime.
3.
Question by Cllr. Ramsay Ross:
There has been a report
of ambulances being used at LRI for holding patients prior to admission (BBC –
10th December 2023) – can we have an explanation from UHL, why this
situation has arisen and what remedial steps are in hand, given that this event
has occurred in early December.
Reply by the Chairman:
I have sought a response from UHL regarding
the issue and they have provided the following statement:
“We have made significant progress this year in reducing
ambulance handover times, with an 80% reduction in the number of lost hours
when compared to 2022 for much of the year. However,
demand for urgent and emergency care services is currently exceptionally
high, with a significant rise in emergency admissions when
compared to the same period last year, driven by the onset of winter
and higher patient acuity, particularly with flu and other viruses, respiratory
issues, and frailty. We apologise to anyone who experiences a delay in their
care.
Patient safety remains our first priority, and we are doing all
we can to ensure people are treated as quickly and safely as possible. In
the event that anyone had to wait in an ambulance upon arrival, we ensure they
are cared for safely, with regular observations and clinical reviews. We will
continue to do all we can to bring handover times down, in line with the
UHL urgent and emergency care plan we published in March 2023. This
includes increasing our capacity, improving patient flow through our hospitals
and working closely with our partners in the ambulance service
and the wider health and care system to improve.
We
are asking people to only attend the Emergency Department if they have a
life-threatening injury or illness or to call 111 or use the 111 online service
to get advice on the best course of action.”
Supplementary question from Cllr. Ross
Cllr Ross asked for clarification with regards to where the answer
referred to increasing capacity and questioned what impact this would have on
patients from Rutland.
Reply from the Chairman
The Chairman asked Jon Melbourne, Chief Operating Officer - University
Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (UHL, whether he could provide any further
information regarding the question. Jon Melbourne explained that the plans to
increase capacity included opening a new ward at Glenfield Hospital and opening
new beds in the community. Jon Melbourne pointed out that overall the ambulance
handover times had improved since the previous year (2022) but acknowledged
that in recent weeks there had been a high demand which had affected handover
times. Jon Melbourne provided reassurance that work was taking place across the
system to ensure that performance in relation to ambulance handovers continued
to improve.
4.
Question by Cllr. Ramsay Ross:
At the Joint Health Scrutiny Meeting on 18th September 2023
under Agenda Item 8: ‘Delivery Plan for recovering access to Primary Care - LLR
System Level Access’ Members emphasised the importance of clearly communicating
to the public any changes to the way GP Practices operated. In particular
Members felt it needed to be made clear to patients in advance whether their
appointment was with a GP, a nurse or a pharmacist. In response it was
explained that the ICB’s Engagement Team was carrying out work in this regard.
The current absence of such a communication plan was also raised by the ICB at
the Rutland Scrutiny Committee of 23rd November 2023. When will a
communication plan be actioned to define the changed roles within our primary
care sector?
Reply by the Chairman:
I have sought a response from the ICB and they have provided the
following statement:
“The ICB has been promoting the changes taking place in primary care
over the last 12 months and the development of new roles in GP practices has
been a key part of our campaign. More recently, the focus on primary care
recovery by reducing pressures on GPs and improving access for patients means
there is renewed focus on the role of alternative health professionals in GP
practices.
The campaign on alternatives to GPs should be seen as an integral part
of a broader campaign to explain the changes taking place in GP practices.
The ICB’s Getting in the Know campaign aims to raise awareness
and support patients to access the right care for their condition by helping
them to understand the services available to them. The campaign covers
Urgent and Emergency Care, Mental Health and Primary Care. The Primary
Care campaign supports patient to access the right care by explaining the
options to them and helping them to determine what be the most appropriate
service and care for their needs. Full details of the campaign are at:
https://leicesterleicestershireandrutland.icb.nhs.uk/your-health/get-in-the-know/
The specific primary care campaign is at: https://leicesterleicestershireandrutland.icb.nhs.uk/your-health/find-the-right-service/your-gp-practice/
The primary care campaign covers:
Information
on alternatives to GPs is available at: https://leicesterleicestershireandrutland.icb.nhs.uk/your-health/find-the-right-service/your-gp-practice/the-practice-team/
A national
campaign commenced in October to raise awareness of the of the different health
professionals in GP teams. The campaign highlights the important role of
reception teams in using information provided by patients to help identify
which health professional or local service is best placed to help them, such as
a community pharmacy.
The campaign
is delivered through multi – cultural assets and is targeted at those more
likely to need a GP appointment: working age adults, parents , olde people and
those with long term conditions. There is also a focus on black and
southeast Asian communities.
In the new
year, the ICB will be working with practices to enhance the local campaign by:
The campaign
will aim to create patient confidence in alternatives to GPs and support the
local system level access and improvement plan.
To keep in
touch with the campaigns it is suggested signing-up for 5 on Friday, the weekly
stakeholder bulletin. Information on campaigns is included in the
bulletin along with a partner toolkit to help local authorities and other
organisations promote our activities on their social media channels. To sign –
up, please email llricb-llr.corporatecomms@nhs.net
You can also
follow us on X @NHS_LLR or Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/NHSLLR/”
Supplementary question from Cllr. Ross
Cllr. Ross asked for a commitment on the timescales for when the communications work in relation to pharmacies would be complete.
Reply from the Chairman
The Chairman offered to seek further information from the Integrated Care Board on this point and provide a written answer after the meeting.
Supporting documents: