Minutes:
The Chief Executive reported that six questions had been received under Standing Order 34.
Lutterworth
Health Services
Questions asked
by Giuliana Foster:
1.
If there is insufficient capital to achieve facilities for the
services consulted upon at Feilding Palmer Cottage Hospital, will the inpatient
beds be re-opened, and a new consultation take place?
2.
Despite being re-assured that the on-line questionnaire for the
Consultation would not ‘time out, many respondents experience exactly that,
including myself. We know from the
feedback given from the ICB to the Lutterworth Steering Group back in March
2024 that a total of 1412 participants took the questionnaire - (1398 usable) - 930 online, 125 postal and 343 online ‘easy read’, but
the drop out figures were high. On-line
630 and ‘easy read’ 258. Can you tell me
what action has the ICB taken to address this high percentage of ‘drop-outs’ as there is nothing relating to this in the ICB’s
report?
3.
Many of the respondents had concerns about ‘care at home’ or in a
care home. 27% did not agree with this
compared to only 19% that agreed. Again,
what actions will be taken to address this by the ICB as I am unable to see
this in the report.
Reply by the Chairman:
1. The findings from the consultation supported the proposals to
use the current space in Feilding Palmer Hospital to provide outpatient and
diagnostic services replacing the current 10 inpatient beds. Since consultation
has finished the capital position has become more challenged with less than
expected capital being available to Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland. This
means the ICB are now having to consider the implications of this on all of their plans. To support this a medium-term capital
plan is being developed over the next six months and schemes prioritised. The
required capital to support the redevelopment of Feilding Palmer Hospital will
be submitted as part of the development of the medium-term capital plan. In the
meantime, the Decision-Making Business Case will be finalised with the findings
from the consultation and presented to the ICB for final decision on the
proposals.
2. The completion rate for the Lutterworth
survey was 66%, which compares very favourably with the average rate for other
ICB surveys, which is generally between 20-50%. There are several reasons why
people may not complete a survey once they have started it. Many people click the link to look at the
survey and find out further information and then simply abandon answering
questions, possibly returning later. The
ICB has not received any correspondence regarding issues with time-outs. The
time-out period for ICB surveys is 60 minutes and users receive a pop-up
warning after 45 minutes of inactivity, and are given
15 minutes to re-commence their activity.
Additionally, the ICB undertakes considerable work to encourage people
to participate in the survey, by ensuring that the questions are designed by
professional researchers, which also helps to ensure that dropouts are
reduced. The ICB uses multiple on and
off-line marketing channels to ensure that people are aware of public
consultation and are supported to complete the survey.
3. The NHS Leicester, Leicestershire and
Rutland ICB (LLR ICB) recognises the importance of the feedback received
regarding proposals to improve health services in Lutterworth. Some of the actions the LLR ICB will take to
address the issues raised around the quality care at home and in care homes
include:
Supplementary questions asked by Giuliana Foster
1.
What assurances can be
given that the capital to support the redevelopment of Feilding Palmer Hospital
will be available and what is the timescale for the redevelopment?
2.
How confident is the ICB
that a high quality of care at home and in care homes is achievable?
Reply:
The Chairman asked representatives from the Integrated Care Board that
were present at the meeting to respond to the supplementary questions. In
response the ICB stated the following:
1.
The capital plan was
being reconsidered and until that work was complete firm assurances could not
be given.
2.
Quality checking was
part of the normal day to day work of the NHS. Any individual concerns would be
escalated to the Integrated Care Board.
Questions asked
by Jean Burbridge:
1.
At the Health Overview and Scrutiny
Committee meeting of 13 September 2023 assurances were given to Mrs B
Seaton CC that the funding of £5.8 M was available for
the refurbishment of Feilding Palmer Community Hospital and
Stakeholders were also being told this. What figure can
be given today, in this meeting? And what timescale can now be
given?
2.
Will there be sufficient capital funding from the
Systems Capital Group to complete the services consulted on?
3.
How will the ICB be addressing the concerns
expressed during the Public Consultation about
substituting professional care provided by the NHS in an inpatient setting
for care provided in care homes where staff have received less
training and who are often not on a professional register?
Reply by the
Chairman:
1. The report for agenda item 9: Health
Services in Lutterworth details the findings from the consultation that took
place into the proposals for Feilding Palmer Hospital. The Decision-Making
Business Case, which will be considered at an ICB meeting in the Autumn, will
set out the full proposals, including capital costs, and supporting
information.
2. Please see the answer to Question 1 above
from Giuliana Foster.
3. Patients need to be in the most appropriate
care setting for their needs whether that be an acute hospital, community
hospital, care home or receiving care at home. Both the NHS and the local
authorities have to ensure that any organisation that provides care is suitably
qualified to offer the services, staff are trained sufficiently
and that quality care is being provided. There are mechanisms in place to do
this and identify any issues and/or warning signs.
Supporting documents: