Agenda item

Questions asked by members under Standing Order 7(3) and 7(5).

Minutes:

The Chief Executive reported that one questions had been received under Standing Order 7(3) and 7(5).

 

Question asked by Mr Max Hunt CC

 

“In the publicity promoting the Bus Service Improvement Plan (BSIP), the Lead Member is quoted saying that "It’s the more rural communities which are set to benefit most from our plans”. According to government figures which are the five most rural County Divisions and their corresponding access to a private car, and the five Divisions with the least access to the private car and their corresponding rurality”?

 

Reply by the Chairman

 

Five most rural County Divisions and their corresponding access to a private car:

Census

Name

Population Density
(number of usual residents per square kilometre)

No car or van in household

1 car or van in household

2 cars or vans in household

3 cars or vans in household

E05005510

Wymondham

19.5

38

246

289

124

E05005497

Croxton Kerrial

24

38

244

308

181

E05011964

Billesdon & Tilton

28.8

52

390

439

238

E05011980

Nevill

30

46

355

459

304

E05005499

Gaddesby

37.7

42

235

292

168

Population density data sourced from ONS-TS006-2021 dataset.

 

Five Divisions with the least access to the private car and their corresponding rurality:

Census

Name

Population Density
(number of usual residents per square kilometre)

No car or van in household

1 car or van in household

2 cars or vans in household

3 cars or vans in household

E05005435

Loughborough Hastings

1880.4

1113

1338

533

109

E05005436

Loughborough Lemyngton

1505.6

966

1365

492

146

E05005536

South Wigston

2566.3

864

1617

814

277

E05005487

Hinckley Castle

4230.3

775

1439

820

211

E05005452

Thurmaston

2104

723

1801

1104

398

Car availability data sourced from ONS-TS045-2021 dataset.

 

To put this into context, the County Council through its BSIP and passenger transport network review is aiming to improve and enhance public transport choice for its rural communities where in most cases there is very limited or no provision for them. In contrast, many of Leicestershire’s market towns have access to more frequent and in most cases, commercial bus services and consequently tend to have more destination choice and travel opportunities. Nonetheless, the Council is working hard through Enhanced Partnership with bus operators to support commercial provision to help ensure it is secure and stable for the benefit of Leicestershire communities.

 

Supplementary Question

 

“Since the figures show a stark difference between the most rural areas (95% with access to a private car) and those urban areas ( 36% with no car), it would be more efficient to put our limited resources into driving up patronage in urban areas without access to a car, by working towards lower fares, evening and weekend services, more reliable timetables, a comfortable ride and the protection of a weatherproof bus shelter  - and in doing so address our most deprived areas?”

 

Response by the Chairman

 

At the request of the Chairman, the Director of Environment and Transport responded that, Leicestershire’s rural areas had a far more limited bus service than its urban areas and market towns. In most cases the more frequent services were provided by commercial operators and residents in urban areas had better opportunities to access services such as health, education, employment where it was more realistic to access these by walking and cycling.

 

Whilst that was currently the reality of the bus network in the County, the County Council had brought its Bus Service Improvement Plan to the Committee and in implementing the plan, had developed an Enhanced Bus Partnership. This focussed on exploring the opportunities of the type that Mr Hunt had referred to and to implement more of those in the urban areas. The Partnership also looked at how to stabilise commercial services in urban areas to make sure those continued as long as possible, as if they didn’t there would be more of a gap and a funding burden.   The Council was therefore very much looking through that Enhanced Bus Partnership to increase the attractiveness of those services for those residents and particularly for the deprived and urban areas. The Director reassured members that the Bus Service Improvement Plan was aimed at addressing this very issue and that the Council was working through our Enhanced Bus Partnership to achieve this.  

Supporting documents: