Minutes:
The Chief Executive reported that three questions had been received under Standing Order 7(3) and 7(5).
1.
Question from Mr. A. Innes CC:
As has been widely publicised, the services at St Mary's Birth Centre
have been suspended for an indeterminate period of time due to staff
shortages. The community in Melton and
the surrounding areas are rightly concerned that this closure may become
permanent. There has been local
representations made by residents, councillors and the MO for Melton and
Syston.
I would like to know what are the current plans for the birthing centre,
and how do the ICB intend to fulfil their statutory responsibility to provide
adequate health services for the communities they serve?
Reply by the
Chairman:
I have asked
University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (UHL) for an answer to your
question and I have received the following response:
“Pausing births and
inpatient care at the Centre from 7 July was a difficult but necessary step. We
did this to ensure the safety of mums and babies - nothing is more important.
We are currently working with colleagues at the Leicester, Leicestershire and
Rutland Integrated Care Board to determine next steps for St Mary's Birth
Centre. This includes discussion of the safety risks and mitigation. We
anticipate an update from the ICB and UHL will happen before January 2026.”
As soon as UHL and
the ICB are ready to provide any further detail about their plans I intend to
request that they attend a meeting of the Leicestershire County Council Health
Overview and Scrutiny Committee to present a report, not just on St Mary’s Birth
Centre, but on the plans for maternity services in the whole of Leicestershire.
Officers will ensure that you are made aware of when this meeting will take
place and provide you with a copy of the report.
2.
Question from Mr. A. Innes CC:
Melton Mowbray is
serviced by a single GP practice, Latham House, and following a recent report
that the project to site a second GP practice in the town has been suspended
there is further upset in the community following this decision. The Melton community cannot continue to have
a situation where appointments are pushed out to 6 weeks and even for simple
tests, we have to wait weeks to have these done.
I would like to ask
does the Chair of the Committee share my concerns and how is the ICB planning
to meet their statutory requirement to ensure that there is adequate healthcare
provision for the communities in their designated areas, and more specifically
for Melton Mowbray?
Reply by the
Chairman:
I share the
concerns of residents and local members from Melton over this issue. Therefore,
we will be examining this matter in more detail at a future meeting of the
Leicestershire County Council Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee. I am
aware of concerns elsewhere in the County over GP practices, so any report we
have will cover not just Melton, but other areas as well. In addition, the
issue of access to GP practices is going to be examined by the Leicester,
Leicestershire and Rutland Joint Health Scrutiny Committee in the new year.
In the meantime, I
have obtained the following statement from the Integrated Care Board:
“We are working
closely with GP practices across Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland (LLR),
including in Melton, to ensure any available, additional funding and
recruitment opportunities are taken up and used to meet the health needs of our
diverse communities, equitably. Practices are supported to implement new ways
of working to improve access and care, including introducing new technology,
integrating a wider range of health professionals, innovating how care is
provided and improving premises.
We are working with
Latham House specifically to increase the ways the practice can support local
residents, including a new digital suite at the main site, an approved
redevelopment of a property owned by the practice on Sherrard Street to extend
clinical services and increasing recruitment including five GPs. We are
committed to continuing to work with Melton Borough Council on the health
services provided for residents and our Chief Executive and Chief Strategy
Officer are due to meet over the coming weeks with the council leaders.
To ensure we use
limited resources in the best way to meet the needs of all patients, we are
also coordinating partners across the health and care system by matching them
to the right level of care for their medical condition, with the right health
professional, in the right part of the NHS, first time, and improving access to
same-day care. We are currently engaging with local communities to raise
awareness of a two-step process to help them get the right care.
Supporting
information:
• The
healthcare provided by GP practices is funded according to the national GP
contract and the integrated care board receives limited other funding streams
with which to increase investment in general practice.
• Recent
examples include additional investment to ensure local practices receive
equitable funding to provide core services and encouraging primary care
networks (groups of practices) to recruit additional staff from a wide range of
roles under the Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme (ARRS) - 30 additional
newly qualified GPs have been employed in practices in LLR under this scheme.
• ICBs
do not routinely receive capital funding to develop new practices themselves.
Any new premises therefore need to be funded by local authority S106
contributions, private/public investment and GP practice investment.
• This
helps balance the needs of all patients across Leicester, Leicestershire and
Rutland using limited NHS resources.
• Over
recent years, GP practices have been working hard to evolve how they provide
care to improve access and improve patients’ health.
o GP
practices have a wider mix of specialist health professional who work together
to care for patients. GPs look after the most seriously unwell patients and
those with the most complex needs and people with less serious health
conditions are supported by the wider practice team, appropriate for the
condition.
o GP
practices also work more closely with community pharmacies. Now conditions that
used to be seen in general practice are looked after in a pharmacy, for example
under the Pharmacy First scheme.
o Practices
are using new technologies which are often more convenient for many people.
Digital options won’t be suitable for everyone, but they free up traditional
methods for those who can’t use online options.
o Cloud
based telephone systems, with a call-back function, and online forms for making
requests.
• Through
GP practices and NHS 111, same-day appointments can be arranged if a patient’s
condition means that they need to be seen quickly. This could be at their own practice, at a
local pharmacy under the Pharmacy First scheme, at an urgent treatment centre
or another GP practice or health centre (during evenings, weekends and bank
holidays). Melton Urgent Care Centre provides these latter appointments. Melton also has a Minor Injury Unit.
• The
ICB regularly seeks the views of local people about the services they
experience, in order to make improvements. The ICB carried out an LLR-wide GP
practice experience survey in 2024. Local residents currently have the
opportunity to share their views of same-day appointments, such as general
practice and pharmacy appointments, and a new two-step approach to getting care
quickly. The questionnaire closes on 7 December 2025: https://leicesterleicestershireandrutland.icb.nhs.uk/be-involved/need-help-fast-engagement/”
3.
Question from Mr. J. T. Orson CC
Melton residents were dismayed
to learn that the ICB has deferred funding for a second GP practice until
February 2027. This decision has understandably intensified concern about the
adequacy of current provision.
Would you agree that the time is
right for constructive scrutiny—particularly in relation to Latham House
Medical Practice? Persistent concerns around staffing levels, patient
engagement, waiting times, and care protocols suggest that Health Scrutiny might
now play a vital role in clarifying both current practice and future need. A
formal review could offer reassurance, transparency, and a pathway forward.
I also believe all four Melton
LCC Members and MBC would welcome the opportunity to contribute a
solutions-focused perspective. There are areas where modest adjustments could
yield meaningful improvements, and I’m confident both Councils stand ready to support
any ongoing efforts.
I hope this letter strikes the
right balance between challenge and collaboration. Please let me know if
further discussion or additional detail would be helpful.
Warm regards,
Joe Orson
Melton Wolds Division
Reply by the Chairman:
I agree that the time is right
for constructive scrutiny of the issues relating to Latham House Medical
Practice. Officers that support the Leicestershire County Council Health
Overview and Scrutiny Committee have been liaising with the Integrated Care Board
regarding which would be a suitable Committee meeting for representatives of
the ICB to come and present a detailed report on access to GP Practices, not
just in the Melton area but in the whole County of Leicestershire. It is hoped
that the report would address many of the issues you raise such as staffing
levels and waiting times. The members that represent divisions in the Melton
area will be invited to the Committee meeting at which this issue is
considered. However, the limitations in terms of the powers and time
constraints of the Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee must be recognised.
Whilst the Committee can request reports and ask questions at public meetings,
a more in-depth formal review would have to be carried out by the ICB
themselves. Please see the interim
response from the ICB set out in the answer to the question from Mr. Innes CC
above. Please be assured that the Committee will continue to scrutinise the ICB
on this topic and will invite you to any Committee meeting relating to health
issues in the Melton area.
Supporting documents: