Minutes:
The Chief Executive reported that two questions had been
received under Standing Order 35.
1. Question
asked by Mr. Adam Stares:
In the Highways & Transport Grown & Savings section
of the current MTFS (Appendix B, point 44 of this Committee's January meeting)
there is a proposal to cut spending on bus subsidies marked as a “Service
Reduction” to save £400,000 each year from 2026/27.
Is the Council still committed to this upcoming spending cut which it has
described as a “service reduction” and what does it expect that the impact will
be on service users from 2026/27?
Reply by the Chairman:
The £400,000 savings requirement to ‘review the application of
the subsidised bus policy, post Covid’, was included in the MTFS prior to award
of one-off central government funding for 2025/26 for bus services (Bus Grant).
Whilst government funding remains in place, budgets will continue to be
maintained at pre-grant award levels, with any inflation increases being met by
grant funding. As things stand, we currently have a one-year Bus Grant
allocation for 2025/26 from the Department for Transport of £8.1m (split
between £5.0m revenue and £3.1m capital). No further funding has been announced
for future years at this stage.
In terms of impacts on bus users, should there be no further
grant funding then savings will be required and proposals to reduce bus
services paid for by the County Council would be developed and engagement with
the community on those proposals would take place. Community feedback and any
changes proposed would be considered by cabinet for approval before any saving
is implemented. It may be helpful to note that the County Council’s Medium Term
Financial strategy is reviewed annually.
In the meantime, aided by the one off ‘Bus Grant’ funding,
the Council is well underway with a comprehensive passenger transport network
review to create more travel opportunities for Leicestershire residents in line
with its Passenger Transport Policy and Strategy. Full details of the phases of
this review and new, amended and improved services including new app based
demand responsive transport Foxconnect services are available on the Council’s
website here: https://www.choosehowyoumove.co.uk/public-transport/get-around-by-bus/leicestershire-buses/leicestershire-network-review/
Details of the new services that have been launched this week in the Charnwood,
Harborough and South West Leicestershire areas are also available on the
website.
Mr. Stares asked the following supplementary question:
“Firstly, thank you for providing the response to my
question. It is good to hear that there is grant funding available for this
financial year but could I clarify with my question that without the grant the
County Council will not be able to maintain the service in the next financial
year and if there is a time table for when we might know if there is a grant
and what that process of community engagement will look like and then in that
engagement process will it be about whether to make those cuts or will it be
about which services to cut or not.”
At the invitation of the Chairman, the Director of
Environment and Transport stated that the grant came from the Department for
Transport (DfT) and its current policy was very supportive of buses which was
reflected in this element of funding. However, the funding had only been
confirmed for the current financial year and whilst the DfT had indicated that
its policy would not change and it was intended that this grant would continue,
this was yet to be confirmed through the Government’s spending review.
In response to whether services would need to be cut, if the grant funding did
not continue then, it was noted this was a possibility. The Council’s base
budgets would not cover the cost of these services. The Director highlighted
that the money allocated was significant, more than the County Council’s base
budgets had been for many years.
The Director advised that the County Council reviewed its
MTFS annually, and the Department would, as part of this process if the funding
ceased, consider its budgets, along with each community’s’ needs taking account
of alternative public transport available, and consult with the public on any
proposed changes.
The Director stated that the Department was hopeful the
grant funding would continue as it was an extensive task to procure a bus
service, and the Council sought to continue these over a long period to achieve
best value for money. It was hoped that there would be an announcement of
multi-year funding settlements this year to enable the Department to make such
long-term plans.
2. Question
asked by Ms. Rachael Wigginton:
“I would like to ask the following question on behalf of the
Leicestershire Active Travel Alliance, the Leicestershire arm of the UK’s
Active Travel Alliance, a national campaigning group to increase investment in
active travel for healthier lives and safer, quieter streets.
My question is as follows:
Resident frustration is growing around the significant
increase in the volume of traffic and streets completely dominated and
overwhelmed by vehicles parked on every spare inch of public space in their
local communities. This is massively
impacting health and wellbeing. A key part of the solution is increasing the
focus and investment in the alternative quieter healthier forms of transport
specifically safe cycling routes to local schools, shops and stations/transport
hubs.
Leicestershire County Council has received a significant
amount of money from Active Travel England to be spent on active travel
schemes. Will the Oadby cyclops scheme that was consulted on last year now go
ahead? If not, why not and what will happen to the funding? We are concerned
that the council will be deemed to lack ambition, as has happened in the past,
and will not secure the funding that is likely to be available in the future
for Leicestershire.”
Reply by the Chairman:
The Council remains committed to delivering high-quality
active travel infrastructure that supports healthier, safer, and more
sustainable transport choices.
The public engagement for the proposed CYCLOPS scheme at The
Parade, Oadby, highlighted a number of issues including concerns around the
one-way circulatory layout not aligning with cyclists' natural desire lines,
potentially leading to a risk of conflict between different users of the
junction. The Council is considering these concerns and discussing options for
a way forward with Active Travel England.
The details of the concerns raised during the consultation
along with recommended way forward will be fully considered via Council’s
democratic process. Subject to the outcome, any revisions to the scheme
recommended following discussion with ATE, will be subject to further public
engagement.
The Council continues to be mindful of the importance of
demonstrating ambition and capability in order to maintain future eligibility
for external funding, including from Active Travel England.
The Chairman advised that Ms. Wigginton was not in
attendance and had not raised any supplementary questions.
The Chairman thanked Mr. Stares and Ms. Wigginton for their
questions.
Supporting documents: