2018/2588/02 (2018/VOCM/0251/LCC)
(a) That the application be refused;
(b) That the Board confirms (as required by the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) that in dealing with the application the County Council worked in a positive and proactive manner, taking account of paragraph 38 of the National Planning Policy Framework.
1. Failure
to accord with Policy DM1, with regards to the environmental and social impact
upon residential properties in the locality.
The proposed mitigation of the acoustic fencing is not considered sufficient to mitigate against the noise, amenity and health
impacts upon the residents of the nearest residential property.
2. Failure to accord with Policy DM11, with respect to the cumulative impact upon the amenity of residential properties in the locality.
2018/2589/02
(2018/VOCM/0252/LCC)
(a) That the application be refused;
(b) That the Board confirms (as required by the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) that in dealing with the application the County Council worked in a positive and proactive manner, taking account of paragraph 38 of the National Planning Policy Framework.
REASONS FOR DECISION:
1. Failure to accord with Policy DM1, with
regards to the environmental and social impact upon residential properties in
the locality. The proposed mitigation of
the acoustic fencing is not considered sufficient to
mitigate against the noise, amenity and health impacts upon the residents of
the nearest residential property.
2. Failure to accord with Policy DM11, the
cumulative impact upon the amenity of residential properties in the locality.
3. With respect to the proposed increase in vehicle movements, the application fails to accord with Paragraph 8 of the NPPF, with regards to bullet points b) and c) in relation to the social and environmental objectives, respectively. With regards to the social objective the application would fail to support communities’ health, social and cultural well-being. With regards to the environmental objective the application fails to demonstrate how the proposals would mitigate and adapt to climate change, including moving to a low carbon economy.