Contact: Karen Brown (Tel. 0116 305 6340) Email: karen.m.brown@leics.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
Apologies for absence/Substitutions. Minutes: |
|
Minutes: The minutes of the meeting held on 15 November 2021 were agreed. |
|
2022/23 Schools Budget PDF 496 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: Jenny Lawrence introduced
the report which presents the 2022/23 Dedicated Schools Grant Settlement for
Leicestershire and the 2022/23 Schools Budget.
Jenny explained that the annual report sets out how all things related
to school funding and brings to Schools Forum their particular powers and
decisions that it has which are set out in paragraph 15. Jenny added that in paragraph 18 there are
some indications that the DfE are developing a revised approach to DSG deficits
and it would appear that the DfE are in the process of negotiating new Safety
Valve Agreements for 2022/23; the DfE have not spoken to Leicestershire
therefore there would not be a Safety Value Agreement for Leicestershire but
they are also stating they are increasing their support and challenge to local
authorities which was unclear but Schools Forum would be kept informed. Jenny reported that
the Dedicated Schools Grant final settlement arrived in December. Jenny highlighted that the supplementary
grant for maintained schools which was to help schools meet the cost of the
health and social care levy but also for significant cost pressures expected
over the coming periods. Jenny said that
these costs, however, have not been confirmed or clarified and the supplementary
grant was expected to be added to the National Funding Formula (NFF) from
2023/24. Jenny referred to
paragraph 24 which sets out that school funding remains a ‘soft’ school funding
formula for 2022/23 and Leicestershire had set the schools budgets as the
NFF. Jenny added that from discussions
with colleagues regionally it would appear that Leicestershire was one of the
few authorities regionally that had been able to deliver the NFF in full
without having to adjust budgets because of increases in areas like FSM and
deprivation creating cost pressures as a result of the lag in LA funding. Jenny added that
the retain school growth funding is set out in the paper and to note the
Secretary of State did not approve the schools block transfer so again schools’
budgets would not be reduced by the transfer.
Jenny added that the DfE has yet to confirm that the Leicestershire
formula is compliant but have no outstanding queries with them so there may be
a timeline issue within their process. Jenny referred to
paragraphs 36-38 on de-delegation for which Jane Moore would take this part of
the report. Jane stated that this was a
significant development since Schools Forum last met. Jane said that last autumn the DfE went out
to consultation on the removal of the School Improvement, Monitoring and Brokerage
Grant which had been allocated to the local authority for many years to support
its statutory duties around school improvement and deliver those expectations
set out on the Schools Causing Concern guidance. Jane stated that the consultation received a
large number of responses nationally and Leicestershire County Council, East
Midlands and the National Association of Directors of Children’s Services all
made a response opposing every part of the consultation. Jane said that in January 2022 the consultation
outcome was published and the DfE would be going ahead with all the proposal to
remove the grant. Jane added that the
grant was ring-fenced and funds school improvement activities with maintained
schools. Jane said that the grant would be reduced by 50% in 2022/23 and removed totally from 2023/24. The DfE, as part of the consultation, would allow local authorities to de-delegate funding from maintained schools to the local authority in order to continue to fund school improvement in maintained schools. Jane said that the DfE’s rationale for this was that it provided consistency with how Multi Academy Trusts fund ... view the full minutes text for item 154. |
|
Maintained School Deficits and Academy Conversion Minutes: Liam Powell explained that he had been approached by a Multi Academy
Trust in the north-west of the county who wish to welcome in a school from the
north of the county. Liam said that the
MAT board wished to proceed but the school would introduce a deficit to the
Trust. Liam added that the ESFA need to
be satisfied that the Trust was not exposing itself to financial risk and the
school could manage its budget. Liam said that the Trust was prepared to ask the local authority to
support financially, and it was important to demonstrate to the ESFA that all
options had been explored by the MAT regardless of the answer. Liam said that the historic deficit was not
helped by age range change for the school that wants to join the Trust and this was being managed and the issue of the two
buildings involved on the campus which had now been sorted. Liam said that the school had presented
different models for progressing this finance and if the lump sum for both
schools separately before they joined could have been continued then there
would have been no deficit but one of them was closed down. Liam said that alternatively the school could
have grown and this could have been another way to
manage the deficit and there had been delays in completing the organisation of
the campus which had been picked up by the school as well. Liam stated that the local authority had
provided everything it could financially so there was no question about that
but feel that there had been a historical injustice and the deficit needs to be
resolved. Liam explained that the if the deficit cannot be resolved the next step
could be to approach the Secretary of State for either the money to be given to
clear the deficit or approval given for it to be paid afterwards under a
managed plan. Liam stated that the Trust
and school asked for him as the representative for LSH to raise with Schools
Forum. Liam and Jenny had spoken and
went through the history of the case and there are other things that the school
could have done historically as well to address this
but the deficit goes with the school and there was no other money in the local
authority to support with the deficit and was asked to raise this which he had. As Chair of this meeting, Karen Allen said that Schools Forum do not
have role in this decision and the local authority’s policy had been clear for
some time that any deficits are only taken on by the local authority when the
school is sponsored and not in any other situations. Karen added that Schools Forum do not have a
role for looking at solutions to a deficit and there was not a fund, to
consider this would be inequitable to other schools in this situation who have
had to carry deficits with them on conversion previously and the comment that
the MAT needs to protect itself would open the door to putting the local
authority into a very difficult position because they too do not have funds to
resolve and if they did this for one school they would have do the same for
other schools that were in that position in the future. Karen thanked Liam for bringing it to Schools Forum but reiterated there was no role for the Schools Forum in this discussion and hopefully services the purpose of what Liam had been asked to do and noted that a discussion had taken ... view the full minutes text for item 155. |
|
Any other business. Minutes: Any Other Business De-delegation/Next Meeting Jenny raised that there would be an additional Schools Forum meeting in March
for the de-delegation item to fulfil the requirements of that process and the
meeting would be on Wednesday 23 March at 2.00 pm. This meeting is only a vote for maintained
schools but requires a Leicestershire Schools Forum meeting. Jenny added that if non-maintained school
members chose not to attend that meeting this would not be an issue and
unfortunately timescales did not allow for the item to be on the agenda today. Graham Bett asked why the January meeting was cancelled. Jenny responded that the January meeting was
an additional meeting put in diaries in case Schools Forum needed to take
decisions on the consultation on the Schools Block Transfer and was not needed. |
|
Date of next meeting. To be confirmed Minutes: Wednesday 23 March 2022, 2.00 pm Monday 6 June 2022, 2.00 pm Thursday 29 September 2022, 2.00 pm |