Venue: Microsoft Teams
Contact: Miss C Tuohy (0116 305 5483). Email: cat.tuohy@leics.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
Chairman's Announcements Minutes: The Chairman
reported the resignation of Ms. D. Haller from her role on the Board the Chairman and all members of the
Board thanked Ms. D. Haller for her long-standing commitment and contribution
to the Leicestershire Pension Fund as an employee representative since the
Board’s inception in 2015. |
|
Minutes of the meeting held on 23 August 2021. PDF 129 KB Minutes: The minutes of the meeting held on 23 August 2021 were taken
as read, confirmed and signed. |
|
Question Time. Minutes: The Chief Executive reported that no questions had been
received under Standing Order 35. |
|
To advise of any other items which the Chairman has decided to take as urgent elsewhere on the agenda. Minutes: There were no items for consideration. |
|
Declarations of interest in respect of items on the agenda. Minutes: The Chairman invited members who wished to do so to declare
any interest in respect of items on
the agenda for the meeting. Mr Shepherd CC declared a personal interest in respect of
Agenda Item 5 Pension Fund Administration Report July to September 2021 as a
Member on the Management Committee of East Midlands Shared Services and ESPO,
and as a Member of Charnwood Borough Council. Mrs. R. Page CC also
declared a personal interest in Agenda Item 5 as a Member of Harborough Borough
Council. |
|
Administration Report July to September 2021 - Quarter Two. PDF 414 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The Board received a report
from the Director of Corporate Resources regarding administration of the Fund
July to September 2021. A copy of the report marked ‘Agenda Item 5’ is filed
with these minutes. Arising from the discussion the following points were
noted:- i.
As with other pension schemes, the
Leicestershire Pension Fund had started to receive an increasing number of
claims from Claim Management Companies, related to previous Fund members who
had transferred out their benefits to a scam, or on bad advice. The Fund had
taken external legal advice due to the high transfer values involved. The
Ombudsmen would consider any claim and could require the Fund to make a
compensatory payment to reinstate Member benefits into the scheme, or an
element of compensation to pay the pension for the cost of their pension
benefits. The Pensions Manager would continue to monitor the situation, and
keep the Board informed. ii.
The Pensions Manager informed the Board that
there had been progression on the 2016 cost cap breach in October, and that HM
treasury planned to proceed with all three proposed changes. As a result, the
chance of a cost cap breach would be reduced for future valuations, from the 2020
exercise. iii.
Due to the McCloud judgement it was not expected
that the 2016 breach would remain breached once the McCloud costs had been
included. However, Members noted that it did not resolve the ongoing challenge
from Unions, as the outcome of the Judicial Review was still unknown. If the
Unions were to win, scheme member benefits would still need to be recalculated. iv.
The Fund had started to receive enquiries from a
small number of multi academy trusts considering full transfers out to other
funds, where the main source of the academy sat. Members noted that the process
to transfer out employers was very time consuming for the administration. The
Board were pleased to note a policy had been developed to manage the cases. v.
For bulk transfers, the Fund looked at all
active members, pensioners and reserve members for an employer and provided the
information to the Actuary who assessed the Fund and liability. The Fund’s Actuary
would then agree with the Actuary of the receiving scheme a cost value based on
the Membership, which would be paid across to remove all assets and
liabilities. This meant the Fund would no longer have any responsibility, even
for preserved and retired members. The Pension Manager could only speculate on
the benefit for multi academy trust’s transfers out, which likely related to an
administrative benefit by minimising the number of Fund’s it needed to liaise
with and provide information to. Any bulk transfer would ultimately be approved
by the Secretary of State, meaning academies could not renege on their
decision. vi.
Members were concerned to note that the
admission agreement for Beacon Academy to Hutchinson Catering remained
outstanding as Hutchinson wanted to wait for the completion of their commercial
contract with Beacon. vii.
Members noted the outstanding bond and admission
agreements and were pleased that since publication of the report there had been
progress with the completion of LIFE MAT to Total Swim. viii.
Members noted that 14 scheme members did not
receive an annual statement, which involved members who worked for Hutchinson
and Atalian Servest.
Members noted had once the admission agreement had been signed the
scheme members would receive their annual benefit statement. The Pensions
Manager assured the Board that the delays were due to the employers, not
administration of the Fund. RESOLVED: a)
That the report be noted. b) That the Chairman write to Hutchinson ... view the full minutes text for item 116. |
|
Continuous Improvements Report. PDF 237 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: The Board considered a reported
of the Director of Corporate Recourses providing an update on progress in respect
of areas identified improvement within the Pensions Section. A copy of the
report, marked ‘Agenda Item 6’, is filed with these minutes. The Board noted that the
current cost impact of McCloud, in relation to Fund resource was limited to an
additional IT system interface tool procured from a current system provider. RESOLVED: That the report be noted. |
|
Pension Fund Annual Report and Accounts 2020/21. PDF 283 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: The Board considered the Fund’s draft Annual and Accounts for 2020/21. A copy of the report marked ‘Agenda Item 7’ is filed with these minutes. The
Board welcomed the report and were pleased that it presented the Fund as being
in a healthy position. Arising
from the report, the following points were noted: i) The Board noted the delay in the result of the
External Audit of Leicestershire County Council and the Pension Fund, and that
the delay was consistent with work across local authorities. ii) The Fund was cash flow positive, which meant it had
more flexibility in changing its asset allocation, as it could buy assets with
cash, rather than divesting current investments. It was recognised in future
years cash flow was expected to decline. iii) It was evident to the Board that responsible
investment was an increasing focus as demonstrated by the extended section
within the Annual Report. Members were pleased to note LGPS Central supported
the Fund on the matter as Central had a dedicated Responsible Investment (RI)
Team. iv) The Director informed the Board that the next step
for the Fund regarding Climate Change was to set its own targets. The Fund
could not divest from all carbon emitters due to benefits some companies
provided in the creation of green energy. v) The Annual report covered up to 31st
March 2021, since year-end membership had changed, following the County Council
election. vi) The Board requested that a glossary be produced for
the report to explain the acronyms within the report. RESOLEVD: That
the draft Pension Fund Annual Report be welcomed, and comments submitted as
part of the report to the Local Pension Committee on 26 November 2021. |
|
Local Pension Board Annual Report 2020/21. PDF 208 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The Board considered the draft Local Pension Board Annual
Report which summarised some of the key highlights of the Board’s work undertaken
during 2020/21. A copy of the report marked ‘Agenda Item 8’ is filed with these
minutes. RESOLVED: That the Local Pension Board Annual Report be approved. |
|
Pension Fund Policy Report. PDF 227 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: Arising from the
discussion the following points were noted:- i)
Regarding administration charges, Members were
assured that Employers were aware from their initial contact with the Pension
Section, and that the detail was available in documentation issued to them. ii)
Cases of overpayment were rare and usually
related to overpayment of an ongoing pension, due to human error. For example,
a widower pension would be paid at a higher rate for a period which would move
to a lower rate, in one case had been missed, as previously reported to Board
and Committee. The new tool Insight allowed for regular reporting to pick up
such cases earlier. Ultimately each case would be considered on its own merit. RESOLVED: That the new and
amended policies be supported. |
|
Responsible Investment Update. PDF 556 KB Minutes: The Board considered a report by the Director of Corporate
Resources, the purpose of which was to provide an overview of progress on the
Fund’s 2021 Responsible Investment Plan.
A copy of the report marked ‘Agenda Item 10’ is filed with these
minutes. The Board noted that the Fund supported engagement, rather
than exclusion as it was more compatible
with the Fund’s fiduciary duty and more supported of responsible investment as
it provided the opportunity to influence companies through stewardship, that
would be waived with divestment. RESOLVED: That the report be noted. |
|
Risk Management and Internal Controls. PDF 235 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The Board considered a report by the Director of Corporate
Resources, the purpose of which was to detail any concerns relating to the risk
management and internal controls of the Fund. A copy of the report marked
‘Agenda Item 11’ is filed with these minutes. Arising from discussion, the following points were made:- i.
The Fund used the Faraday Tracing Bureau to
identify the death of pensioners, to prevent overpayment, potential fraud or
irregularity. The system did not work for overseas pensioners. The National
Fraud Intelligence Bureau mortality screening, was able to check deaths of UK citizens
abroad however only took place every two years. The Fund would consider
changing it to biannually. ii.
Members suggested that Claim Management
Companies, the 2016 cost cap, and its link to the McCloud case, be incorporated
into the risk register. iii.
Members were informed that Risk 11 was expected
to remain a significant risk as it would pose a significant impact to the Fund
if it went awry, however it was not considered appropriate to increase it past
eight. RESOLVED: That the risk register be reviewed inline with the comments set out by the Board |
|
Date of Next Meeting. Minutes: RESOLVED: That the next meeting of the Local Pension Board be
Wednesday 16 February 2021 at 10.00am. |
|
Any other items which the Chairman has decided to take as urgent. |