Venue: Sparkenhoe Committee Room, County Hall, Glenfield
Contact: Mr. S. J. Weston (Tel: 0116 305 6226) Email: sam.weston@leics.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
In Attendance: Mr. J. T.
Orson JP CC, Cabinet Lead Member for Community Safety (For Minute 198) Mr. I. D. Ould
CC (For Minute 196) |
|
Appointment of Chairman. To note that Mr. S. J. Galton CC has been appointed
Chairman of the Scrutiny Commission in accordance with Article 6.05 of the
Constitution Minutes: RESOLVED: That Mr. S.
J. Galton CC be appointed Chairman for the period ending
with the Annual Meeting of the County Council in 2012. |
|
Election of Deputy Chairman. Minutes: RESOLVED: That Dr. R.
K. A. Feltham CC be appointed
Deputy Chairman for the period ending with the Annual Meeting of the County
Council in 2012. |
|
Minutes: The minutes
of the meeting held on |
|
Question Time. Minutes: The Chief
Executive reported that no questions had been received under Standing Order 35. |
|
Questions asked by Members. Minutes: The Chief
Executive reported that no questions had been received under Standing Order
7(3) and 7(5). |
|
Urgent Items. Minutes: There were no
urgent items for consideration. |
|
Declarations of Interest. Minutes: The
Chairman invited members who wished to do so to declare any interest in respect
of items on the agenda for the meeting. Dr. S. Hill
CC and Mr. J. T. Orson JP CC each declared a personal, non-prejudicial interest
in respect of item 11 as members of the Leicestershire Police Authority (Minute
198 refers). |
|
Declarations of the Party Whip. Minutes: There were no
declarations of the party whip. |
|
Presentation of Petition: Bus Service No. 7 - Request for increased frequency of service. A
petition is to be presented by Mr. I.D. Ould CC, on behalf of Lead Petitioner
Dr. David Hickie and as local member, signed by 247 local residents, in the
following terms: “We, the undersigned, petition Additional documents: Minutes: A petition submitted by Dr. David Hickey, Chairman of Witherley Parish Council, signed by 247 local residents was presented to the by the local member, Mr. I. D. Ould CC requesting that the Council revisit the recent changes to the number 7 bus route through Witherley Parish with a view to improving the frequency of service.
A briefing note of the Director of Environment and Transport summarising the situation relating to the petition was considered by the Commission. A copy of this report, marked ‘B’, is filed with these minutes.
With the consent of the Chairman, Mr. Ould addressed the Commission and stated that, whilst he accepted that the future of the Service would be considered as part of an upcoming Scrutiny Review of the bus network policy, he felt that it may be appropriate for the Review to take account of a report published by De Montfort University on the additional cost of living in rural areas.
The Director of Environment and Transport addressed the Commission and stressed that the reduction to the number 7 bus route was compliant with Council policy and that the service currently cost the Council in the region of £120,000 per year to run. The Director confirmed that key stakeholders would be consulted as part of the Scrutiny Review.
RESOLVED: (a)
That it
be noted that the policy for the support of Local Bus Services is to be the
subject of a forthcoming Scrutiny Review Panel in the Autumn; (b)
That
Bus Service No. 7 will be assessed against the policy emerging from that review
process. |
|
Leicestershire Rural Framework 2011-14. Additional documents: Minutes: The
Commission considered a report of the Chief Executive concerning the draft
Leicestershire Rural Framework 2011-14. A copy of the report, marked ‘C’, is
filed with these minutes. It was
reported that around £530 million had been made available by the Government to support broadband network upgrade projects in rural
areas. The funding
would be administered by Broadband Delivery UK. Any proposals for the funding
put forward by the County Council would require the approval of the Cabinet. Arising from discussion of the draft Framework, members of the Commission made the following points about the document: ·
The
document would benefit from fewer and measurable ‘deliverables’. This would
enable members to easily revisit the document and assess progress made against
targets; ·
There
was little promotion of Community Forums, which were now viewed as a key
consultation mechanism for the Council. There should also be more focus given
to the Big Society and the proposals for community led planning as part of the
Localism Bill; ·
Promotion
of the document would be key to its success. Engagement with district and
parish councils would be carried out via the Rural Partnership Board. RESOLVED: (a)
That
the report be noted and that the comments made be considered by the Cabinet at
its meeting on 26 July; (b)
That
the work the Council is currently engaged in to improve broadband connectivity
be the subject of a report to a future meeting of the Commission. |
|
Safer Communities Agreement 2011-13. The Cabinet Lead Member for Safer Communities, Mr. J.
T. Orson JP CC will be present for this item. Additional documents: Minutes: The
Commission considered a report of the Chief Executive concerning the Safer
Communities Agreement 2011-13. A copy of the report, marked ‘C’, is filed with
these minutes. The Chief Executive reported that the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill was expected to receive royal assent in November. Election of the new Police and Crime Commissioners would then follow. The elected Commissioner would cover both the County and City areas. Control of the Community Safety Fund and other funding streams would pass to the Police and Crime Commissioner, but it was currently unknown how this would affect the funding of existing Community Safety activities.
With the permission of the Chairman, the Cabinet Lead Member for Safer Communities, Mr. J. T. Orson CC addressed the Commission and commended the Agreement to the Commission. Mr. Orson stated that it was important for the County Council and partners to demonstrate to the new Commissioner how effective the Council’s Community Safety Service was so far as to ensure his or her continual support.
RESOLVED: (a)
That
the Safer Communities Agreement be commended to the Safer Communities Strategy
Board; (b)
That
an update be provided at a future meeting of the Commission in regard to the
changes made to Community Safety Partnerships and the appointment of the Police
and Crime Commissioner arising from the introduction of the Police Reform and
Social Responsibility Bill. |
|
Overview and Scrutiny Annual Report 2010/11. Under the
terms of the Constitution, Overview & Scrutiny Committees are required to
report annually to Council on their workings and make recommendations for
future work programmes and amended working methods. A copy of a draft annual report, which has been prepared
in consultation with the Scrutiny Commissioners, is attached for the comments
of members, prior to submission to the County Council on 6 July. Minutes: The
Commission considered a draft version of the Overview and Scrutiny Annual
Report 2010/11 prior to submission to the full County Council meeting in July.
A copy of the report, marked ‘E’, is filed with these minutes. In
commenting on the Annual Report members praised the document for its ease of
reading which would help to make it more accessible for members of the public. RESOLVED: (a)
That
the draft Overview and Scrutiny Annual Report 2010/11 be approved for
consideration by the full County Council at its meeting on 6 July; (b)
That
the officers responsible for drafting the document be commended for preparing a report
that is easy to read and understand. |
|
Work Programme Issues. Additional documents: Minutes: The Commission considered a report of the
Chief Executive concerning matters which had arisen from a meeting of the
Scrutiny Commissioners. A copy of the report is filed with these minutes. RESOLVED: (a)
That the
establishment of a Scrutiny Review Panel on the 95% bus coverage policy with
the terms of reference outlined in Appendix A to this report be approved and
that Mr. Slater CC be nominated to serve as Chairman on the Review; (b)
That
the intention to hold a workshop session to discuss Overview and Scrutiny
priorities and the work plan for 2011/12 be noted and that members be canvassed
for dates to hold the session in early July; (c)
That it
be noted that member training sessions focused around project management for
Scrutiny Review Panels would be held through June and July and members be
encouraged to take part in the sessions. |
|
Date of next meeting. The next meeting of the Scrutiny Commission has been
scheduled for Wednesday 7 September 2011 at 2.00pm. Minutes: It was NOTED
that the next meeting of the Commission would be held on |