60. |
Questions asked by members under Standing Order 7(3) and 7(5).
Minutes:
Mr Hunt CC asked the following questions of the
Chairman:
“The current target for the achievement of Workplace
Travel Plans is the Local Transport Plan (LTP2) target that, “50% of all
employers with more than 250 staff shall have a Travel Plan by 2011" and
in September 2008 the Director reported to the Environment Scrutiny Committee
that we were on track to meet this target.
Would the Chairman:-
1. Report on progress and provide a list
of those employers who have delivered Travel Plans to date?
2.
Tell the
Commission which of these have reported progress since implementation, in terms
of increased use of public transport, cycling and walking, and if there are any
particularly excellent exemplars we could champion?
3.
Schedule a
report back to the Commission to indicate the level of success we have had by
the 2011 milestone, and further monitoring and development anticipated?”
The Chairman replied as follows:
“1 Good progress has been made and by the
end of March a total of 47 'major employers' in Leicestershire had adopted
travel plans as follows:
Employer / Organisation
Name
|
Nos
Emplyd
|
District
|
Year 1st
included
in APR
(Year ending)
|
PlgPermNo
or Voluntary
|
Alliance
& Leicester, Carlton Park
|
1200
|
BL
|
2010
|
V
|
Antalis, Interlink Pk
|
300
|
NW
|
2008
|
2005/1857/07
|
Argos, Fosse Park
|
270
|
BL
|
2004
|
2002/0807/01
|
Asda, Thurmaston
|
280
|
CH
|
2001
|
1998/0433/02
|
Ashfield
Healthcare, Ashby
|
1200
|
NW
|
2007
|
2004/1583/07
|
AstraZeneca,
Loughborough
|
1300
|
CH
|
2003
|
V
|
Babcock
HSC, Pegasus Pk
|
350
|
NW
|
2004
|
2001/1172/07
|
Blaby DC, Narborough
|
360
|
BL
|
2009
|
V
|
BT
Rolatruc, Meridian
|
250
|
BL
|
2007
|
2004/0574/01
|
Caterpillar
(UK) + Cat
Logistics, Desford
|
1650
|
HI
|
2001
|
1998/0965/04
|
CaterpillarLogistics/Quinton Hazell, Hinckley
|
315
|
HI
|
2007
|
2006/0362/04
|
Centrica/British Gas
Business, Grove Pk
|
1000
|
BL
|
2005
|
2002/0707/01
|
Charnwood BC,
Loughborough
|
760
|
CH
|
2001
|
V
|
Dimensions,
Willow Fm, Cas Don
|
250
|
NW
|
2010
|
2007/1128/07
|
Dunelm, Syston
|
250
|
CH
|
2006
|
2006/3459/02
|
Dunlop
Bestobell, Shepshed
|
260
|
CH
|
2006
|
2005/0696/02
|
E2Save,
Loughborough
|
250
|
CH
|
2007
|
2006/3597/02
|
East
Midlands Airport Ltd
|
250
|
NW
|
2002
|
V
|
EME/Powergen, Pegasus Pk, EMA
|
500
|
NW
|
2002
|
1999/0175/07
|
FloGas, Syston
|
1000
|
CH
|
2004
|
2003/1195/03
|
George
at Asda, Magna Park
|
400
|
HA
|
2003
|
2004/0260/03
|
Hill
Rom, Ashby
|
260
|
NW
|
2007
|
V
|
Hinckley Community Hospital Ph1
|
260
|
HI
|
2010
|
2002/0893/04
|
HM
Prison - Gartree, Mkt Harboro
|
460
|
HA
|
2010
|
2005/1803/03
|
Johnson
Stalbridge Linen Services, Hinckley
|
275
|
HI
|
2007
|
2004/0882/04
|
Kettleby Foods/Samworth, LFE
|
285
|
BL
|
2008
|
2007/0559/01
|
Kingfield
Heath, Magna Park
|
440
|
HA
|
2003
|
2000/0779/03
|
Laddaw Ltd,
Interlink Park, Bardon
|
250
|
NW
|
2005
|
2003/0651/07
|
LaFarge Aggregates,
Watermead Business Pk, Syston
|
500
|
CH
|
2005
|
2001/2035/02
|
Leicestershire
CC, Glenfield
|
1700
|
BL
|
2003
|
V
|
Long
Clawson Dairy
|
260
|
ME
|
2008
|
2007/0145/06
|
Loughborough College of FE
|
450
|
CH
|
2005
|
2003/2730/02
|
Loughborough University
|
3000
|
CH
|
2002
|
V
|
LPC
(UK) Ltd, Rothley Lodge
|
350
|
CH
|
2010
|
2000/2268/02
|
My
Home Move, Grove Park
|
260
|
BL
|
2008
|
2004/0643/01
|
Next
Retail Plc HQ, Enderby
|
1500
|
BL
|
2002
|
2002/0885/01
|
Next
Retail Store, Fosse Park, Braunstone
|
280
|
BL
|
2001
|
1999/0409/01
|
Polypipe Civils, Loughborough
|
320
|
CH
|
2008
|
2008/2053/02
|
PriceWaterhouseCoopers, Pegasus Pk
|
500
|
NW
|
2003
|
2001/1017/07
|
RBS,
Grove Park
|
280
|
BL
|
2009
|
2005/0508/01
|
Sainsbury's,
Grove Farm
|
480
|
BL
|
2007
|
2003/0858/01
|
SainsburysStore,
Loughborough
|
400
|
CH
|
2004
|
2002/2459/02
|
Samworth Bros (Saladworks), LFE, Blaby
|
500
|
BL
|
2004
|
2001/1004/01
|
Stephenson
College II, Coalville
|
500
|
NW
|
2006
|
2001/1275/07
|
Tesco, Ashby
|
400
|
NW
|
2010
|
2008/1606/07
|
Tesco,
Loughborough
|
450
|
CH
|
2006
|
2004/3387/02
|
Triumph
MC (Factory 2), Hinckley
|
250
|
HI
|
2005
|
2003/0525/04
|
Summary
|
|
|
|
|
29 IN OUTER COUNTY
|
14960
|
|
|
|
18 IN INNER COUNTY
|
12045 ... view the full minutes text for item 60.
|
61. |
Urgent Items.
Minutes:
There were
no urgent items for consideration.
|
62. |
Declarations of interest.
Minutes:
The
Chairman invited members who wished to do so to declare any interest in respect
of items on the agenda for the meeting.
The following members each declared a personal and non-prejudicial
interest in respect of Item 10 as members of district/borough councils (Minute 68
refers):
Mr. A. D. Bailey CC
Mr. R. Blunt
CC
Mr. G. A. Boulter CC
Mrs. R. Camamile CC
Mrs. J. A. Dickinson CC
Mr. S. J. Galton CC
Mr. Max Hunt CC
Mr. P. G. Lewis CC
Mrs. R. Page
CC
Mrs. P. Posnett CC
Mrs. J. Richards CC
Mr. R. J. Shepherd CC
The
following members each declared a personal and non-prejudicial interest in
respect of item 13 as concessionary travel pass holders (Minute 70 refers):
Mr. A. D. Bailey CC
Mr. G. A. Boulter CC
Dr. R. K. A. Feltham CC
Mrs. J. Richards CC
Mr. R. J. Shepherd CC
|
63. |
Declarations of the Party Whip in accordance with Overview and Scrutiny Procedure Rule 16.
Minutes:
There were
no declarations of the party whip.
|
64. |
Presentation of Petitions under Standing Order 36.
Minutes:
The Chief
Executive reported that no petitions had been received under Standing Order 36.
|
65. |
Change to the Order of Business.
Minutes:
The Chairman sought and obtained the consent of the
Commission to vary the order of business from that set out in the agenda.
|
66. |
Scrutiny Review Panel Report on Road Safety.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The
Commission considered the final report and recommendations of the Scrutiny
Review Panel on Road Safety Measures. A copy of the report, marked ‘B’, is
filed with these minutes.
The
Chairman of the Panel, Mr. R. J. Shepherd CC, introduced the report and
commended its recommendations which would assist in improving further the
Council’s road safety record.
The Commission considered the comments of Mr. J. T. Orson CC which outlined
reasons why the Council’s policy for not allowing the use of blind spot mirrors
on the highway should be reinvestigated. A copy of the submission from Mr.
Orson is filed with these minutes.
The
following points arose from discussion:
- The Panel looked at a number of
techniques to limit speed, such as Vehicle Activated Signs, 20 mph speed
limits and speed humps. The Panel had worked on the basis that one was not
necessarily more effective than another, but that each should be used on
its merits in each case;
- It would be increasingly
important going forward that a focus be placed on the education of drivers
through, for example, the introduction of green driver and fleet driver
defensive programmes both within the County Council and the wider local
business sector in an effort to change driving trends, reduce speeding and
have a positive effect on the environment;
- In regard to Mr. Orson’s
comments, the Commission considered that this issue had now been fully
explored as part of the Review and that it was fully supportive of the
proposals included in the report.
RESOLVED:
That, subject to taking account of the comments made above,
the conclusions and recommendations of the Review Panel be endorsed and that
the report be submitted to the Cabinet for consideration at its meeting on 15
June.
|
67. |
Enforcement Programme for the Under age Sales of Tobacco Products and Aerosol Paints 2010/11. PDF 222 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The
Commission considered a report of the Chief Executive concerning the proposed
2010/11 Enforcement Programme for Under Aged Sale of Tobacco and Aerosol
Products. A copy of the report, marked ‘C’, is filed with these minutes.
In response
to concern raised by members that, arising from test purchasing in relation to
tobacco products, too few illegal sales had led to prosecutions, the Chief
Executive reported that the Council’s was required to be considered in its
approach and work productively with businesses to publicise the law and improve
practice, rather than ensure that the majority of breaches of the law went
before the courts.
RESOLVED:
That the Cabinet be advised that this Commission supports and welcomes
the proposed Enforcement Programme outlined in the report.
|
68. |
Medium Term Delivery Plan. PDF 218 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The
Commission considered a report of the Chief Executive concerning the Medium
Term Delivery Plan. A copy of the report, marked ‘D’, is filed with these
minutes.
It was
questioned why, in the absence of the Leader, the Cabinet Lead Member - Mr. M. B.
Page CC - had not been in attendance to present the report, given that it was a
major document on which the Authority had identified its key corporate
priorities up to 2013. The Chairman indicated that he and the other
Commissioners had enquired with the Lead Member as to his availability, but he
unfortunately had a prior engagement.
Arising
from consideration of the document, the following points were noted:
General
- A paginated contents would be a
useful addition;
- There was general concern expressed
in relation to a number of targets, given the Authority’s recently agreed
Medium Term Financial Strategy (MTFS) which included efficiency savings in
a number of areas in which the document included delivery targets. A view
was expressed that these targets would need to be closely monitored
against the MTFS and that it would be necessary to take into account the
savings requirement to be achieved by other agencies;
“Children and Young People”
- The target to reduce bullying
(as referred to on page 24) should be strengthened, with a particular
focus on ensuring a consistent approach to reducing racist attitudes and
other forms of discrimination, as bullying was only one aspect of this
wider issue;
“A Prosperous, Innovative and Dynamic
Community”
- A number of the targets
contained in the document, such as those to improve the lives of
vulnerable people (as referred to on page 13) appeared to be at odds with
the recently agreed MTFS, which had included a cut in the Breaking the
Barriers Team, which located employment opportunities for those with
learning difficulties. It was highlighted that much of the document had
been stress-tested within the context of the MTFS, particularly those that
involved partners as part of the LAA, however some targets outside the
remit of the LAA had not;
- The use of the Community
Infrastructure Levy and Tax Incentive Fund (as referred to on page 13) as an avenue
of exploration in regard to the support of infrastructure investments was
questioned, given that the Fund had yet to receive full approval by the
Government;
“Climate Change and Attractive Environment”
- Some members felt that the
reference to climate change (as referred to on page 16) as being
scientifically definitive was too strong. It was felt that reference should
be made to the fact that scientific evidence now ‘appeared’ to be
overwhelming;
- The evidence used to indicate
that temperatures would increase by 2.2°C in winter and 2.5°C
in summer should
be cited;
“Voluntary and Community Sector and
Volunteering”
- The references to use of the
voluntary and community sector to delivery a number of activities to
empower communities was questioned given the Council’s cut in financial
contribution to Voluntary Action Leicestershire which had led to a
reduction in hours of service for community hubs.
RESOLVED:
That the
comments of the Commission be forwarded to the Cabinet for consideration at its
meeting on 10 May.
|
69. |
Youth Justice Strategic Plan 2010-11. PDF 209 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The
Commission considered a report of the Chief Executive concerning the Youth
Offending Service’s (YOS) Youth Justice Strategic Plan 2010-11. A copy of the
report, marked ‘E’, is filed with these minutes.
In response
to questions, the Commission was advised as follows:
- There were risks to delivery in
relation to a number of targets contained within the document,
particularly given the Authority’s budget position and the Service’s
multi-agency funding, however it was pleasing that annual funding
contributions had remained unaffected thus far;
- The YOS had a large and
increasing volunteering workforce providing critical work towards the
targets contained within the Plan. It was suggested that the
volunteering arrangements could be more strongly highlighted in the Plan,
given the excellent contribution they made to youth justice in
Leicestershire.
RESOLVED:
That the
Plan and the performance of the YOS, particularly in relation to its increase
in recruitment of volunteers, be commended to the Cabinet for consideration at
its meeting on 10 May.
|
70. |
Draft Equality, Diversity and Human Rights Strategy 2010-13. PDF 70 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The
Commission considered a report of the Chief Executive concerning the draft
Equality, Diversity and Human Rights Strategy 2010-13. A copy of the report,
marked ‘F’, is filed with these minutes.
RESOLVED:
That the
draft Equality, Diversity and Human Rights Strategy 2010-13 be commended to the
Cabinet for consideration at its meeting on 10 May.
|
71. |
Scrutiny Review Panel Report on Concessionary Travel.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The
Commission considered the final report and recommendations of the Scrutiny
Review Panel on Concessionary Travel. A copy of the report, marked ‘G’, is
filed with these minutes.
The
Chairman of the Panel, Mr. G. A. Boulter CC, introduced the report and commended
its recommendations which would assist in providing a more cohesive
concessionary travel scheme.
It was
reported that the Department for Transport (DfT)
wished to simplify the guidance on reimbursement of bus operators, but that
this was threatened by the possibility of some bus operators taking the matter
to judicial review. It was therefore expected that the process would be
delayed.
There
remained uncertainty over how many people would in future sign up to the
concessionary scheme. The reimbursement to bus operators and the subsequent
financial contribution from the Authority would therefore remain unpredictable.
RESOLVED:
(a)
That the conclusions and recommendations of the Review
Panel be endorsed and that the report be submitted to the Cabinet for
consideration at its meeting on 15 June;
(b)
That the Commission concurs with the view of the
Panel that, it would be beneficial to reconvene the Panel when the outcome of
consultation carried out by the DfT in relation to
the reimbursement of bus operators became available.
|
72. |
Dates of future meetings.
The following dates are proposed for future meetings of the
Commission:
Wednesday 9 June 2010
Wednesday 1 Sept 2010
Wednesday 10
November 2010
Wednesday 8 December
2010
Wednesday 2 February
2011
Wednesday 2 March 2011
Wednesday 20 April
2011
Wednesday 8 June 2011
Wednesday 7 September
2011
Wednesday 9 November 2011
(All meetings to start
at 2.00pm)
Minutes:
The
following programme of meetings for 2010/11 was NOTED:
Wednesday 9 June 2010
Wednesday 1 Sept 2010
Wednesday 10
November 2010
Wednesday 8 December
2010
Wednesday 2 February
2011
Wednesday 2 March 2011
Wednesday 20 April
2011
Wednesday 8 June 2011
Wednesday 7 September
2011
Wednesday 9 November
2011
(All meetings to start
at 2.00pm)
|
|